Cited by 65Diabetes Treatment and ManagementPancreatic function and diabetesNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

GIP and GLP-1: stepsiblings rather than monozygotic twins within the incretin family

Nauck, Michael A., Meier, Juris J.·2019·Diabetes

Abstract

The importance of the incretin effect for the postprandial augmentation of insulin released has long been recognized (1). However, there has been a long-standing controversy as to the relative importance of the various gastrointestinal hormones in mediating this effect. While earlier studies suggested a contribution of gastrin, secretin, and cholecystokinin (2), it later became obvious that in humans, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) are the predominant incretin hormones (1). Which of the two incretins is the most relevant one is still a matter of debate. Gasbjerg et al. (3) performed studies in healthy human subjects receiving oral glucose loads of 75 g in the fasting state on four different days. The known incretin hormones, GIP and GLP-1, which are secreted in response to glucose administration/absorption, were antagonized with the established peptide receptor antagonist exendin(9-39), blocking the stimulation of GLP-1 receptors, or with the novel GIP receptor antagonist, GIP(3-30)amide, a naturally occurring fragment of intact GIP (full sequence 1–42), which has recently been characterized as a specific GIP receptor antagonist for use in human studies (4). A similar GIP receptor antagonist, GIP(7-30)amide, had previously been used in animal studies but had not been validated for human experiments (5). These incretin receptor antagonists were compared with placebo and used alone and in combination. The result was a slig…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dbi19-0005

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nauck, M. A., & Meier, J. J.
Affiliations
St. Josef-Hospital (DE)
Corresponding author
Meier, Juris J.
Venue
Diabetes
Published
2019-04-16
Volume
68
Issue
5
Pages
897-900
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W2936477874
Cited by
65
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2
FWCI
4.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, glucagon-like peptide-1, incretin effect, exendin-9-39, postprandial insulin secretion, oral glucose tolerance, glycemic response, GIP receptor
MeSH terms
Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide, Glucose, Humans, Twins, Monozygotic, Glucagon-Like Peptide 1, Incretins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review