The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Association of Pro12Ala Polymorphism in Peroxisome Proliferator–Activated Receptor γ With Pre-Diabetic Phenotypes
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE—The provariant of the Pro12Ala polymorphism in peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor (PPAR)γ has been identified as a risk allele for type 2 diabetes. The purpose of the present study was to reveal a significant association with pre-diabetic phenotypes in nondiabetic individuals based on a systematic meta-analysis of all available published evidence. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—We performed a classical meta-analysis of data from ∼32,000 nondiabetic subjects in 57 studies to assess the effect of the Pro12Ala polymorphism on pre-diabetic traits. RESULTS—In the global comparison, there were no differences in BMI, glucose, insulin, or homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance between the Pro/Pro and X/Ala genotype. However, in the Caucasian subgroup, the X/Ala genotype was associated with significantly increased BMI. In the obese subgroup (BMI >30 kg/m2), fasting glucose (P = 0.041) and insulin resistance (by homeostasis model analysis) (P = 0.020) were significantly greater in the Pro/Pro group. In subjects with the homozygous Ala/Ala genotype, fasting insulin was significantly lower compared with the Pro/Pro genotype (P = 0.040, NAla/Ala = 154). CONCLUSIONS—Across all studies, the Pro12Ala polymorphism had no significant effect on diabetes-related traits. Only in selected subgroups, such as Caucasians and obese subjects, did we see an association of the Ala allele with greater BMI and greater insulin sensitivity. This demonstrates the importance for appropriate stratification of analyses by environmental or other genetic factors. Meta-analysis of Ala/Ala homozygotes more clearly demonstrated the association with greater insulin sensitivity of carriers of the Ala allele.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lohmueller, K. E., Pearce, C. L., Pike, M., Lander, E. S., & Hirschhorn, J. N. (2003) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1071 · Cited by 1,900
Proinsulin, C-peptide, and insulin in normal subjects during an 8-h hyperglycemic clamp
Hartling, S. G., Røder, M. E., Dinesen, B., & Binder, C. (1996) · European Journal of Endocrinology · doi:10.1530/eje.0.1340197 · Cited by 16
Cited by
The genetics of obesity: From discovery to biology
Loos, R. J. F., & Yeo, G. S. H. (2022) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-021-00414-z · Cited by 1,291
Ahlqvist, E., Ahluwalia, T. S., & Groop, L. (2011) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2010.157016 · Cited by 166
Metadata
- Authors
- Tönjes, A., Scholz, M., Loeffler, M., & Stumvoll, M.
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2006-11-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2489-2497
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2095770480
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Association of Pro12Ala Polymorphism in Peroxisome Proliferator–Activated Receptor γ With Pre-Diabetic Phenotypes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/dc06-0513
- The paper
- Tönjes, A., Scholz, M., Loeffler, M., & Stumvoll, M. (2006). Association of Pro12Ala Polymorphism in Peroxisome Proliferator–Activated Receptor γ With Pre-Diabetic Phenotypes. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc06-0513
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.