Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,092

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes–2006

Open access
Tseng, Kingston H.·2006·Diabetes Care

Abstract

I recently encountered a discrepancy in the American Diabetes Association’s (ADA’s) recommendations regarding conventional versus SI units for HDL cholesterol (1). The article states “raise HDL cholesterol to >40 mg/dl (1.15 mmol/l).” Simple calculation shows that 40 mg/dl = 40 × 0.02586 mmol/l = 1.03 mmol/l, rather than 1.15 mmol/l. The same error is also noted in the 2005 version. Furthermore, in regard to the ADA’s recommendation to use statin therapy for diabetic patients without overt cardiovascular disease (CVD), the recommendation to treat “regardless of baseline LDL” might have extended beyond the evidence quoted. I …

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc06-0805

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,092

Metadata

Authors
Tseng, K. H.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2006-11-01
Volume
29
Issue
11
Pages
2563-2564
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2036538757
Cited by
1,092
References
0
FWCI
154.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes–2006. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/dc06-0805
The paper
Tseng, K. H. (2006). Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes–2006. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc06-0805

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.