Cited by 58Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and ManagementNatural Antidiabetic Agents Studies

Vinegar ingestion at bedtime moderates waking glucose concentrations in adults with well-controlled type 2 diabetes

Open access
White, Andrea M., Johnston, Carol S.·2007·Diabetes Care

Abstract

iven the importance of maintaining acceptable blood glucose concentrations, there is much interest in identifying foods and diet patterns that will help individuals with diabetes manage their condition.Based on previous data indicating that vinegar ingestion at mealtime reduces postprandial glycemia (1-4), the aim of this pilot study was to examine whether vinegar ingestion at bedtime reduces the next-morning fasting glucose concentration in individuals with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-Four men and seven women (aged 40 -72 years) diagnosed with type 2 diabetes (by a physician) who were not taking insulin completed the study.Participants provided a clinically determined A1C reading from a recent (Ͻ2 months) blood analysis.All participants gave written informed consent, and the study was approved by the institutional review board at Arizona State University.Participants maintained 24-h diet records for 3 days and measured fasting glucose at 0700 h for 3 consecutive days with a calibrated glucometer before the start of the study.Participants were instructed to continue usual prescription medication use during the study.Utilizing a randomized crossover design with a 3-to 5-day washout period between treatments, participants followed a standardized meal plan for 2 days, consuming either 2 Tbsp apple cider vinegar or water at bedtime with 1 oz cheese (8 g protein,

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc07-1062

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 21 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
White, A. M., & Johnston, C. S.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2007-11-01
Volume
30
Issue
11
Pages
2814-2815
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W1989243836
Cited by
58
References
21
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies
Keywords
apple cider vinegar, type 2 diabetes, fasting blood glucose, glycemic control, postprandial blood glucose, dietary intervention
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diet, Diabetic, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Middle Aged, Diet Records, Acetic Acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review