The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring Functional, Communicative, and Critical Health Literacy Among Diabetic Patients
Abstract
OBJECTIVE—Health literacy (HL), the capacity of individuals to access, understand, and use health information to make informed and appropriate health-related decisions, has been recognized as an important concept in patient education and disease management. This study examined the psychometric properties of newly developed scales for measuring three different levels of HL (i.e., functional, communicative, and critical) in patients with diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—The reliability and validity of the three HL scales were evaluated in a sample of 138 outpatients with type 2 diabetes. In addition, sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, knowledge of diabetes, information-seeking behaviors, and self-efficacy were assessed for each patient through a self-report questionnaire and review of electronic medical records. RESULTS—Scale items were constructed to directly reflect the definition of HL. Internal consistency of functional, communicative, and critical HL scales was adequately high (α = 0.84, α = 0.77, and α = 0.65, respectively). Three interpretable factors were identified in exploratory factor analysis. Correlations between HL scales and other measures supported the construct validity of the scales. The three HL scales were only moderately correlated with each other, suggesting that each represents a different domain of HL abilities and skills. CONCLUSIONS—Our newly developed HL scales are reliable and valid measures of three types of HL in diabetic patients. Exploring a patient's HL levels may provide a better understanding of the patient's potential barriers to self-management of disease and health-promoting behaviors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Health Literacy: A Prescription to End Confusion
Committee on Health Literacy, Board on Neuroscience and Behavioral Health, & Institute of Medicine (2004) · doi:10.17226/10883 · Cited by 3,444
Literacy and health outcomes: A systematic review of the literature
DeWalt, D. A., Berkman, N. D., Sheridan, S., Lohr, K. N., & Pignone, M. P. (2004) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.40153.x · Cited by 2,309
Cited by
Critical health literacy: A review and critical analysis
Chinn, D. (2011) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.04.004 · Cited by 471
van der Vaart, R., van Deursen, A. J., Drossaert, C. H., Taal, E., van Dijk, J. A., & van de Laar, M. A. (2011) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1840 · Cited by 404
Improving health literacy in community populations: a review of progress
Nutbeam, D., McGill, B., & Premkumar, P. (2018) · Health Promotion International · doi:10.1093/heapro/dax015 · Cited by 459
Nakayama, K., Osaka, W., Togari, T., Ishikawa, H., Yonekura, Y., Sekido, A., & Matsumoto, M. (2015) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1835-x · Cited by 338
Self-citationMeasuring health literacy in Asia: Validation of the HLS-EU-Q47 survey tool in six Asian countries
Duong, T. V., Aringazina, A., Baisunova, G., Nurjanah, Pham, T. V., Pham, K. M., Truong, T. Q., Nguyen, K. T., Oo, W. M., Mohamad, E., et al. (2017) · Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.je.2016.09.005 · Cited by 329
Metadata
- Authors
- Ishikawa, H., Takeuchi, T., & Yano, E.
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2008-05-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 874-879
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2120541723
- Cited by
- 565
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring Functional, Communicative, and Critical Health Literacy Among Diabetic Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/dc07-1932
- The paper
- Ishikawa, H., Takeuchi, T., & Yano, E. (2008). Measuring Functional, Communicative, and Critical Health Literacy Among Diabetic Patients. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc07-1932
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.