Cited by 353Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes and associated disordersDiabetes Management and Education

Cognitive Function in Children With Type 1 Diabetes

Open access
Gaudieri, Patricia A., Chen, Rusan, Greer, Tammy F., Holmes, Clarissa S.·2008·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—To quantify the magnitude and pattern of cognitive difficulties in pediatric type 1 diabetes as well as the effects associated with earlier disease onset and severe hypoglycemia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Pediatric studies of cognitive function since 1985 were identified for study inclusion using MEDLINE and PsycInfo. Effect size (ES, Cohen's d) between the diabetic and control groups, expressed in SD units, were calculated within cognitive domains to standardize meta-analysis test performance. RESULTS—The meta-analysis sample of 2,144 children consisted of 1,393 study subjects with type 1 diabetes and 751 control subjects from 19 studies. Overall, type 1 diabetes was associated with slightly lower overall cognition (ES −0.13), with small differences compared with control subjects across a broad range of domains, excluding learning and memory, which were similar for both groups. Learning and memory skills, both verbal and visual (−0.28 and −0.25), were more affected for children with early-onset diabetes (EOD) than late-onset diabetes (LOD), along with attention/executive function skills (−0.27). Compared with nondiabetic control subjects, EOD effects were larger, up to one-half SD lower, particularly for learning and memory (−0.49). Generally, seizures were associated with a negligible overall cognition ES of −0.06, with slight and inconsistent cognitive effects found on some measures, possibly reflecting the opposing effects of poorer versus better metabolic control. CONCLUSIONS—Pediatric diabetes generally relates to mildly lower cognitive scores across most cognitive domains. Cognitive effects are most pronounced and pervasive for EOD, with moderately lower performance compared with control subjects. Seizures are generally related to nominal, inconsistent performance differences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc07-2132

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Diabetes may cause acute and chronic neurocognitive changes, including cognitive decline affecting psychomotor speed, cognitive flexibility, attention, and visual perception.

    “People with diabetes might also have both chronic and acute neurocognitive changes that include decline in cognitive function with detrimental effects on psychomotor speed, cognitive flexibility, attention, and visual perception.121,122”

    From Type 1 diabetes (2018) · cites this paper as [121]

    The Results (page unavailable) report slightly lower psychomotor speed, attention/executive function, and visual-motor integration scores in children with type 1 diabetes than in controls. The claim extends those findings to people with diabetes generally and to both acute and chronic changes; the paper does not establish those distinctions or specifically report cognitive flexibility. Its Limitations section also cautions that causal inference is problematic. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 353

Authors
Gaudieri, P. A., Chen, R., Greer, T. F., & Holmes, C. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
  • Georgetown University (US)
  • University of Southern Mississippi (US)
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2008-09-01
Volume
31
Issue
9
Pages
1892-1897
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2060167275
Cited by
353
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 17
FWCI
9.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Diabetes Association
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK56975, DK070917, R01DK070917, R01DK056975)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, pediatric diabetes, cognitive function, early-onset diabetes, late-onset diabetes, learning and memory, attention, executive function, hypoglycemia, seizures, metabolic control, children
MeSH terms
Child, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Humans, Hypertension, Hypoglycemia, Intelligence, Learning, Memory, Motor Activity, Reference Values

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review