Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 385

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Alanine Aminotransferase, γ-Glutamyltransferase, and Incident Diabetes

Open access
Fraser, Abigail, Harris, Ross, Sattar, Naveed, Ebrahim, Shah, Davey Smith, George, Lawlor, Debbie A.·2009·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate and compare associations of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and γ-glutamyltransferase (GGT) with incident diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: ALT and GGT were studied as determinants of diabetes in the British Women's Heart and Health Study, a cohort of 4,286 women 60–79 years old (median follow-up 7.3 years). A systematic review and a meta-analysis of 21 prospective, population-based studies of ultrasonography, which diagnosed nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), ALT, and GGT as determinants of diabetes, were conducted, and associations of ALT and GGT with diabetes were compared. RESULTS: Ultrasonography-diagnosed NAFLD was associated with more than a doubling in the risk of incident diabetes (three studies). ALT and GGT both predicted diabetes. The fully adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for diabetes per increase in one unit of logged ALT was 1.83 (95% CI 1.57–2.14, I2 = 8%) and for GGT was 1.92 (1.66–2.21, I2 = 55%). To directly compare ALT and GGT as determinants of diabetes, the fully adjusted risk of diabetes in the top versus bottom fourth of the ALT and GGT distributions was estimated using data from studies that included results for both markers. For ALT, the HR was 2.02 (1.59–2.58, I2 = 27%), and for GGT the HR was 2.94 (1.98–3.88, I2 = 20%), suggesting that GGT may be a better predictor (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Findings are consistent with the role of liver fat in diabetes pathogenesis. GGT may be a better diabetes predictor than ALT, but additional studies with directly determined liver fat content, ALT, and GGT are needed to confirm this finding.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc08-1870

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 385

Metadata

Authors
Fraser, A., Harris, R., Sattar, N., Ebrahim, S., Davey Smith, G., & Lawlor, D. A.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2009-01-08
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
741-750
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2148327131
Cited by
385
References
6
FWCI
16.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Alanine Aminotransferase, γ-Glutamyltransferase, and Incident Diabetes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/dc08-1870
The paper
Fraser, A., Harris, R., Sattar, N., Ebrahim, S., Davey Smith, G., & Lawlor, D. A. (2009). Alanine Aminotransferase, γ-Glutamyltransferase, and Incident Diabetes. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc08-1870

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.