Incident dysglycemia and progression to type 1 diabetes among participants in the Diabetes Prevention Trial-Type 1
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: We studied the incidence of dysglycemia and its prediction of the development of type 1 diabetes in islet cell autoantibody (ICA)-positive individuals. In addition, we assessed whether dysglycemia was sustained. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Participants (n = 515) in the Diabetes Prevention Trial-Type 1 (DPT-1) with normal glucose tolerance who underwent periodic oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) were followed for incident dysglycemia (impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance, and/or high glucose levels at intermediate time points of OGTTs). Incident dysglycemia at the 6-month visit was assessed for type 1 diabetes prediction. RESULTS: Of 515 participants with a normal baseline OGTT, 310 (60%) had at least one episode of dysglycemia over a maximum follow-up of 7 years. Dysglycemia at the 6-month visit was highly predictive of the development of type 1 diabetes, both in those aged <13 years (P < 0.001) and those aged > or =13 years (P < 0.01). Those aged <13 years with dysglycemia at the 6-month visit had a high cumulative incidence (94% estimate by 5 years). Among those who developed type 1 diabetes after a dysglycemic OGTT and who had at least two OGTTs after the dysglycemic OGTT, 33 of 64 (52%) reverted back to a normal OGTT. However, 26 (79%) of the 33 then had another dysglycemic OGTT before diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: ICA-positive individuals with normal glucose tolerance had a high incidence of dysglycemia. Incident dysglycemia in those who are ICA positive is strongly predictive of type 1 diabetes. Children with incident dysglycemia have an especially high risk. Fluctuations in and out of the dysglycemic state are not uncommon before the onset of type 1 diabetes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
At stage 2 of type 1 diabetes, there is ~60% risk by 2 years and ~75% risk within 5 years of developing symptomatic type 1 diabetes.
“At stage 2 of the disease, there is 60% risk by 2 years and 75% risk within 5 years of developing symptomatic type 1 diabetes (57,58).”
From 2. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes: <i>Standards of Care in Diabetes—2024</i> (2024) · cites this paper as [57]
The Results (page not provided) show that dysglycemia predicted progression to type 1 diabetes, supporting the claim’s general point. They do not report a 60% risk of symptomatic diabetes by two years or a 75% risk by five years for people at stage 2: the reported progression estimates are 65% at four years after dysglycemia and 94% at five years for dysglycemic children under 13. The paper’s roughly 41% and 73% two- and five-year estimates concern developing dysglycemia, not symptomatic diabetes. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredAt stage 2 of type 1 diabetes, there is 60% risk by 2 years and 75% risk within 5 years of developing a clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes.
“At stage 2 of the disease, there is 60% risk by 2 years and 75% risk within 5 years of developing a clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes (55,56).”
From 2. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes: standards of care in diabetes-2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [55]
The Results report that dysglycemia predicted progression to clinical type 1 diabetes, and that 75% of a small subgroup of children under 13 with persistent dysglycemia developed it during a maximum follow-up of 4.5 years. They do not report a 60% risk by two years or a 75% five-year risk for everyone at stage 2; the reported five-year estimate for children under 13 with dysglycemia was 94%. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 18 · Cited by 76
- Authors
- Sosenko, J. M., Palmer, J. P., Rafkin-Mervis, L., Krischer, J. P., Cuthbertson, D., Mahon, J., Greenbaum, C. J., Cowie, C. C., Skyler, J. S., & the Diabetes Prevention Trial–Type 1 Study Group
- Affiliations
- University of Miami (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- Division of Endocrinology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida;
- University of South Florida (US)
- Western University (CA)
- Benaroya Research Institute (US)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sosenko, Jay M.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2009-06-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1603-1607
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- PMC
- PMC2732147
- OpenAlex
- W2124855406
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Diabetes Care (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (UC4DK117009)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
- Keywords
- type 1 diabetes, dysglycemia, islet autoantibodies, impaired glucose tolerance, impaired fasting glucose, oral glucose tolerance test, prediabetes, disease progression, children, risk prediction
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Blood Glucose, Child, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Male, Proportional Hazards Models, Glucose Intolerance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review