Cited by 1,393Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

2. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes: standards of care in diabetes-2025

Open access
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, ElSayed, Nuha A., McCoy, Rozalina G., Aleppo, Grazia, Balapattabi, Kirthikaa, Beverly, Elizabeth A., Briggs Early, Kathaleen, Bruemmer, Dennis +18 more·2025·Diabetes Care

Abstract

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) “Standards of Care in Diabetes” includes the ADA’s current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, an interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA’s clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc25-s002

Cites

224 of 224 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

98 of 147 cited sources checked · 43 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation
    § 2.2a

    The association of A1C with risk for complications appears to be similar in African American and non-Hispanic White populations.

    “Reassuringly, studies have shown that the association of A1C with risk for complications appears to be similar in African American and non-Hispanic White populations (28).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [28] Selvin, 2013, No racial differences in the association of glycated hemoglobin with kidney disease and cardiovascular outcomes, Diabetes Care source
  • Premisecitation
    § 2.2a

    X-linked glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase G202A, carried by 11% of African American individuals in the U.S., is associated with a decrease in A1C of about 0.8% in homozygous men and 0.7% in homozygous women compared with levels in individuals without the variant.

    “Another genetic variant, X-linked glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase G202A, carried by 11% of African American individuals in the U.S., is associated with a decrease in A1C of about 0.8% in homozygous men and 0.7% in homozygous women compared with levels in individuals without the variant (21).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [21] Wheeler, 2017, Impact of common genetic determinants of hemoglobin A1c on type 2 diabetes risk and diagnosis in ancestrally diverse populations: a transethnic genome-wide meta-analysis, PLoS Med source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation
    § Type 2 diabetes

    Glucose and A1C levels may rise well before the clinical onset of diabetes (e.g., changes in FPG and 2-h PG can occur about 6 months before diagnosis).

    “Glucose and A1C levels may rise well before the clinical onset of diabetes (e.g., changes in FPG and 2-h PG can occur about 6 months before diagnosis) (44), making diagnosis feasible under ideal situations of serial monitoring of individuals at high risk of type 1 diabetes before the onset of DKA.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [44] Bogun, 2020, C-peptide levels in subjects followed longitudinally before and after type 1 diabetes diagnosis in TrialNet, Diabetes Care source

      The Results report that mean fasting and 2-hour glucose levels began rising about six months before clinical type 1 diabetes diagnosis, supporting the glucose portion of the claim. Our copy does not report a prediagnosis rise in A1C (searched: A1C, HbA1c), so that part is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.89)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation
    § Confirming the Diagnosis

    Confirmation of diabetes diagnosis can be accomplished by two abnormal screening test results, measured either at the same time or at two different time points.

    “This can be accomplished by two abnormal screening test results, measured either at the same time (29) or at two different time points.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [29] Selvin, 2018, Prognostic implications of single-sample confirmatory testing for undiagnosed diabetes: a prospective cohort study, Ann Intern Med source
  • Premisecitation
    § Use of Fasting Plasma Glucose or 2-Hour Plasma Glucose for Screening and Diagnosis of Diabetes

    Antecedent carbohydrate restriction in the days prior to OGTT can falsely elevate postchallenge glucose levels, potentially resulting in a false-positive OGTT.

    “Antecedent carbohydrate restriction in the days prior to OGTT can falsely elevate postchallenge glucose levels, potentially resulting in a false-positive OGTT (12).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [12] Klein, 2021, Carbohydrate intake prior to oral glucose tolerance testing, J Endocr Soc source
  • May combine two claims. 56
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 9
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § TYPE 1 DIABETES

    The rate of b-cell destruction is quite variable, being rapid in some individuals (particularly but not exclusively in infants and children) and slow in others (mainly but not exclusively adults).

    “The rate of b-cell destruction is quite variable, being rapid in some individuals (particularly but not exclusively in infants and children) and slow in others (mainly but not exclusively adults) (44,58).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [44] Bogun, 2020, C-peptide levels in subjects followed longitudinally before and after type 1 diabetes diagnosis in TrialNet, Diabetes Care source

      The Introduction (page unavailable) reports that adults have a slower rate of C-peptide decline than children, and the Results find that age influences that rate. This supports the age-related pattern, but the paper measures C-peptide as an indicator of β-cell function, not the rate of β-cell destruction, and its participants were aged 3.9 years or older, so it does not establish the claim about infants. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [58] Greenbaum, 2012, Fall in C-peptide during first 2 years from diagnosis: evidence of at least two distinct phases from composite type 1 diabetes TrialNet data, Diabetes source

      The Results report variation in individual C-peptide decline, and the Discussion says decline was faster at ages 7–21 than above age 21. But the paper measures β-cell function after diagnosis, not destruction directly, and explicitly says its data cannot support conclusions about children younger than 7, including infants (Discussion; page unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § TYPE 1 DIABETES

    Adults may retain sufficient b-cell function to prevent DKA for many years; such individuals may have remission characterized by decreased insulin needs for months or years, eventually become dependent on insulin for survival, and are at risk for DKA.

    “Adults may retain sufficient b-cell function to prevent DKA for many years; such individuals may have remission characterized by decreased insulin needs for months or years, eventually become dependent on insulin for survival, and are at risk for DKA (33-35, 59,60).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [33] Humphreys, 2019, Individual and diabetes presentation characteristics associated with partial remission status in children and adults evaluated up to 12months following diagnosis of type 1 diabetes: an ADDRESS-2 (After Diagnosis Diabetes Research Support System-2) study analysis, Diabetes Res Clin Pract source
    • cites [34] Thomas, 2019, Type 1 diabetes defined by severe insulin deficiency occurs after 30 years of age and is commonly treated as type 2 diabetes, Diabetologia source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [35] Hope, 2016, Practical Classification Guidelines for Diabetes in patients treated with insulin: a cross-sectional study of the accuracy of diabetes diagnosis, Br J Gen Pract source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [59] Mishra, 2018, A global perspective of latent autoimmune diabetes in adults, Trends Endocrinol Metab source
    • cites [60] Buzzetti, 2017, Adult-onset autoimmune diabetes: current knowledge and implications for management, Nat Rev Endocrinol source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.2a

    A1C may not be a suitable diagnostic test in people with anemia, people treated with erythropoietin, or people undergoing hemodialysis or HIV treatment.

    “A1C may not be a suitable diagnostic test in people with anemia, people treated with erythropoietin, or people undergoing hemodialysis or HIV treatment (1,19,20).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [1] Sacks, 2023, Guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus, Diabetes Care source

      The 'Other Patient-Related Factors and Interfering Factors' section (page unavailable) says altered red-blood-cell turnover can make HbA1c results spurious and require glucose testing for diagnosis; it specifically discusses hemolytic and iron-deficiency anemia. The passages found do not address erythropoietin treatment, hemodialysis, or HIV treatment as reasons A1C may be unsuitable for diagnosis. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [19] Eckhardt, 2012, Glycated hemoglobin A(1c) as screening for diabetes mellitus in HIV-infected individuals, AIDS Patient Care STDS source

      The Introduction (page not provided) notes that HbA1c screening may be unsuitable with abnormal red-cell turnover, including iron-deficiency anemia. The Discussion (page not provided) finds HbA1c insensitive for diagnosing diabetes in HIV-infected patients, though it also calls HbA1c a practical screening option when used with fasting blood glucose. Our copy does not address erythropoietin treatment or hemodialysis, and it does not establish the same concern for every form of anemia. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [20] Kim, 2009, A1C underestimates glycemia in HIV infection, Diabetes Care source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § TYPE 1 DIABETES

    At stage 1 of type 1 diabetes, the 5-year risk of developing symptomatic type 1 diabetes is 44% overall but varies considerably based on number, titer, and specificity of autoantibodies as well as age of seroconversion and genetic risk.

    “At stage 1, the 5-year risk of developing symptomatic type 1 diabetes is 44% overall but varies considerably based on number, titer, and specificity of autoantibodies as well as age of seroconversion and genetic risk (45).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [45] Insel, 2015, Staging presymptomatic type 1 diabetes: a scientific statement of JDRF, the Endocrine Society, and the American Diabetes Association, Diabetes Care source

      The Overview of Staging, Stage 1 section gives an approximately 44% five-year risk for children screened for genetic risk at birth who reach stage 1, not an overall estimate for everyone at stage 1. The Stage 1 section supports variation by autoantibody number, titer and type, age at seroconversion, and HLA genotype. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § TYPE 1 DIABETES

    At stage 2 of type 1 diabetes, there is 60% risk by 2 years and 75% risk within 5 years of developing a clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes.

    “At stage 2 of the disease, there is 60% risk by 2 years and 75% risk within 5 years of developing a clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes (55,56).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [55] Sosenko, 2009, Incident dysglycemia and progression to type 1 diabetes among participants in the Diabetes Prevention Trial-Type 1, Diabetes Care source

      The Results report that dysglycemia predicted progression to clinical type 1 diabetes, and that 75% of a small subgroup of children under 13 with persistent dysglycemia developed it during a maximum follow-up of 4.5 years. They do not report a 60% risk by two years or a 75% five-year risk for everyone at stage 2; the reported five-year estimate for children under 13 with dysglycemia was 94%. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [56] Krischer, 2013, The use of intermediate endpoints in the design of type 1 diabetes prevention trials, Diabetologia source

      The Results report a 74% risk of type 1 diabetes four years after confirmed dysglycaemia, close to the claimed 75% but at a different time point. They do not report a 60% risk of clinical diagnosis at two years; the two-year figure for this group is a 41% risk of progressing from normal glucose tolerance to dysglycaemia. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Confirming the Diagnosis

    The features most useful in determination of type 1 diabetes include younger age at diagnosis (<35 years) with lower BMI (<25 kg/m2), unintentional weight loss, ketoacidosis, and plasma glucose >360 mg/dL (>20 mmol/L) at presentation.

    “The features most useful in determination of type 1 diabetes include younger age at diagnosis (<35 years) with lower BMI (<25 kg/m 2 ), unintentional weight loss, ketoacidosis, and plasma glucose >360 mg/dL (>20 mmol/L) at presentation (36) (Fig.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [36] Holt, 2021, The management of type 1 diabetes in adults. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD), Diabetes Care source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Type 2 diabetes

    Misdiagnosis is common and can occur in 40% of adults with new type 1 diabetes (e.g., adults with type 1 diabetes misdiagnosed as having type 2 diabetes).

    “and that misdiagnosis is common and can occur in 40% of adults with new type 1 diabetes (e.g., adults with type 1 diabetes misdiagnosed as having type 2 diabetes).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [36] Holt, 2021, The management of type 1 diabetes in adults. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD), Diabetes Care source

      The “Differentiating Type 1 Diabetes From Type 2 Diabetes” section says misclassification is common and that over 40% of people developing type 1 diabetes after age 30 are initially treated as having type 2 diabetes. The claim omits the age-after-30 qualifier, presenting the figure as applying to adults with new type 1 diabetes generally. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.1a

    FPG, 2-h PG, and A1C reflect different aspects of glucose metabolism, and diagnostic cut points for the different tests will identify groups with incomplete concordance.

    “FPG, 2-h PG, and A1C reflect different aspects of glucose metabolism, and diagnostic cut points for the different tests will identify groups with incomplete concordance (3).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [3] International Expert Committee, 2009, International Expert Committee report on the role of the A1C assay in the diagnosis of diabetes, Diabetes Care source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.1).

    Occasionally, people with type 2 diabetes may present with DKA, particularly members of certain racial, ethnic, and ancestral groups (e.g., African American and Hispanic/Latino adults), who may present with ketosis-prone type 2 diabetes.

    “Occasionally, people with type 2 diabetes may present with DKA (37), particularly members of certain racial, ethnic, and ancestral groups (e.g., African American and Hispanic/Latino adults), who may present with ketosisprone type 2 diabetes (30).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [37] Zhong, 2018, Trends in hospital admission for diabetic ketoacidosis in adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes in England, 1998-2013: a retrospective cohort study, Diabetes Care source
    • cites [30] Umpierrez, 2024, Hyperglycemic crises in adults with diabetes: a consensus report, Diabetes Care source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Type 2 diabetes

    Diagnostic accuracy may be improved by using higher-specificity tests, using confirmatory testing for other autoantibodies, and restricting testing to those with clinical features suggestive of autoimmune diabetes.

    “Diagnostic accuracy may be improved by using higher-specificity tests, using confirmatory testing for other autoantibodies, and restricting testing to those with clinical features suggestive of autoimmune diabetes (48).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [48] Jones, 2021, Latent autoimmune diabetes of adults (LADA) is likely to represent a mixed population of autoimmune (type 1) and nonautoimmune (type 2) diabetes, Diabetes Care source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Screening for Type 1 Diabetes Risk

    Of 585 children who developed more than two autoantibodies, nearly 70% developed type 1 diabetes within 10 years and 84% within 15 years.

    “Of the 585 children who developed more than two autoantibodies, nearly 70% developed type 1 diabetes within 10 years and 84% within 15 years (40).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [40] Ziegler, 2013, Seroconversion to multiple islet autoantibodies and risk of progression to diabetes in children, JAMA source

      The Results section (“Children With Multiple Islet Autoantibodies”; page not provided) reports 585 children and estimated diabetes progression of 69.7% at 10 years and 84.2% at 15 years after seroconversion. But “multiple” includes children with two autoantibodies, whereas the claim says more than two. The reported percentages are follow-up risk estimates, not counts of children who developed diabetes. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § TYPE 1 DIABETES

    This immune-related adverse event occurs in just under 1% of checkpoint inhibitor-treated individuals but most commonly occurs with agents that block the programmed cell death protein 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 pathway alone or in combination with other checkpoint inhibitors.

    “This immune-related adverse event occurs in just under 1% of checkpoint inhibitortreated individuals but most commonly occurs with agents that block the programmed cell death protein 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 pathway alone or in combination with other checkpoint inhibitors (66).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [66] Stamatouli, 2018, Collateral damage: insulin-dependent diabetes induced with checkpoint inhibitors, Diabetes source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Screening for Type 1 Diabetes Risk

    Testing coupled with education about diabetes symptoms and close follow-up has been shown to enable earlier diagnosis and to prevent DKA.

    “Such testing, coupled with education about diabetes symptoms and close follow-up, has been shown to enable earlier diagnosis and to prevent DKA (77,78).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [77] Barker, 2004, Clinical characteristics of children diagnosed with type 1 diabetes through intensive screening and follow-up, Diabetes Care source
    • cites [78] Elding Larsson, 2014, Children followed in the TEDDY study are diagnosed with type 1 diabetes at an early stage of disease, Pediatr Diabetes source

      The Discussion says that monitoring with screening and repeated education about symptoms may improve outcomes, and that TEDDY children had low DKA rates compared with the general population. It also links close follow-up to early diagnosis. But the Results report DKA in 8 of 100 children, so the paper supports a lower DKA rate, not a categorical claim that follow-up prevents DKA. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Screening for Type 1 Diabetes Risk

    Many genetic risk studies have been performed in populations of European ancestry and discriminatory ability may differ in those of different ancestry.

    “As many genetic risk studies have been performed in populations of European ancestry and discriminatory ability may differ in those of different ancestry, more large case-control cohorts from non-European populations are still needed (82).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [82] Luckett, 2023, Utility of genetic risk scores in type 1 diabetes, Diabetologia source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Screening and Testing for Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes in Children and Adolescents

    ADA clinical guidance concluded that A1C, FPG, or 2-h PG also could be used to test for prediabetes or type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents.

    “However, ADA clinical guidance concluded that A1C, FPG, or 2-h PG also could be used to test for prediabetes or type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents (114).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [114] Arslanian, 2018, Evaluation and management of youth-onset type 2 diabetes: a position statement by the American Diabetes Association, Diabetes Care source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.25

    The ongoing epidemic of obesity and diabetes has led to more type 2 diabetes in people of reproductive age, with an increase in the number of pregnant individuals with undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in early pregnancy.

    “The ongoing epidemic of obesity and diabetes has led to more type 2 diabetes in people of reproductive age, with an increase in the number of pregnant individuals with undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in early pregnancy (164-166).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [164] Feig, 2014, Trends in incidence of diabetes in pregnancy and serious perinatal outcomes: a large, population-based study in Ontario, Canada, 1996-2010, Diabetes Care source
    • cites [165] Peng, 2017, Trends and racial and ethnic disparities in the prevalence of pregestational type 1 and type 2 diabetes in Northern California: 1996-2014, Am J Obstet Gynecol source

      The Comments report increasing pregestational type 2 diabetes and suggest that rising obesity among women of reproductive age likely contributed. But Materials and Methods says the study identified diabetes clinically recognized before pregnancy; it does not establish an increase in undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in early pregnancy. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [166] Jovanovič, 2015, Trends in the incidence of diabetes, its clinical sequelae, and associated costs in pregnancy, Diabetes Metab Res Rev source

      The Introduction and Results report increasing type 2 diabetes among women of child-bearing age and pregnant women. The Introduction gives an estimate of undiagnosed diabetes only for US adults generally; it does not establish an increase among pregnant people in early pregnancy. The paper also does not attribute the increase to obesity. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § POSTTRANSPLANTATION DIABETES MELLITUS

    Use of immunosuppressive therapies is a major contributor to the development of PTDM, but the risks of transplant rejection outweigh the risks of PTDM.

    “Although the use of immunosuppressive therapies is a major contributor to the development of PTDM, the risks of transplant rejection outweigh the risks of PTDM, and the role of the diabetes health care professional is to treat hyperglycemia appropriately regardless of the type of immunosuppression (138).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [138] Sharif, 2014, Proceedings from an international consensus meeting on posttransplantation diabetes mellitus: recommendations and future directions, Am J Transplant source

      Recommendation 5 (page not provided) identifies immunosuppression as the major modifiable risk factor for PTDM and advises choosing regimens for patient and graft survival rather than PTDM risk alone. It calls for balancing PTDM against rejection risk, however, rather than saying rejection risk always outweighs PTDM risk. Recommendation 6 recommends treating posttransplant hyperglycemia, but does not specifically assign that role to diabetes health care professionals regardless of immunosuppression type. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Cystic Fibrosis-Related Diabetes

    Cystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CFRD) is a common comorbidity in people with cystic fibrosis, occurring in about 20% of adolescents and 40-50% of adults.

    “Cystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CFRD) is a common comorbidity in people with cystic fibrosis, occurring in about 20% of adolescents and 40-50% of adults (127).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [127] Ode, 2022, ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: management of cystic fibrosis-related diabetes in children and adolescents, Pediatr Diabetes source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Cystic Fibrosis-Related Diabetes

    A1C is not recommended for screening for CFRD due to low sensitivity; however, a value of >=6.5% is consistent with a diagnosis of CFRD and reduces patient screening burden.

    “A1C is not recommended for screening due to low sensitivity; however, a value of $6.5% ($48 mmol/mol) is consistent with a diagnosis of CFRD and reduces patient screening burden (129-131).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [129] Gilmour, 2019, Response to the letter to the editor from Dr. Boudreau et al, “Validation of a stepwise approach using glycated hemoglobin levels to reduce the number of required oral glucose tolerance tests to screen for cystic fibrosis-related diabetes in adults, Can J Diabetes source
    • cites [130] Gilmour, 2019, Cystic fibrosis-related diabetes screening in adults: a gap analysis and evaluation of accuracy of glycated hemoglobin levels, Can J Diabetes source
    • cites [131] Darukhanavala, 2021, Use of hemoglobin A1c to identify dysglycemia in cystic fibrosis, PLoS One source

      The Discussion says HbA1c has low sensitivity for diagnosing CFRD and that guidelines do not recommend it for screening. Our copy does not state that an HbA1c value of ≥6.5% diagnoses CFRD; its Introduction presents reduced screening burden only as a potential benefit if HbA1c proved suitable, while its Conclusion does not support its use for screening pre-CFRD dysglycemia. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young

    MODY is inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern with abnormalities in at least 14 genes on different chromosomes identified to date.

    “It is inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern with abnormalities in at least 14 genes on different chromosomes identified to date (152).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [152] Greeley, 2022, ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: the diagnosis and management of monogenic diabetes in children and adolescents, Pediatr Diabetes source

      The section on autosomal dominant familial mild hyperglycemia or diabetes (MODY; page unavailable) says known MODY subtypes involve dominantly acting mutations and that at least 14 genes have been reported to cause a MODY-like phenotype. It does not establish that those genes are all on different chromosomes, and it qualifies the count as genes reported to cause a MODY-like phenotype. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Cystic Fibrosis-Related Diabetes

    The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry evaluated 3,553 people with cystic fibrosis and identified 445 (13%) with CFRD.

    “The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry (132) evaluated 3,553 people with cystic fibrosis and identified 445 (13%) with CFRD.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [132] Franck Thompson, 2020, The association of pediatric cystic fibrosis-related diabetes screening on clinical outcomes by center: a CF patient registry study, J Cyst Fibros source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § POSTTRANSPLANTATION DIABETES MELLITUS

    Posttransplantation hyperglycemia is an important risk factor for subsequent PTDM; a formal diagnosis of PTDM is optimally made once the individual is stable on maintenance immunosuppression (usually at least 45 days) and in the absence of acute infection.

    “Whereas posttransplantation hyperglycemia is an important risk factor for subsequent PTDM, a formal diagnosis of PTDM is optimally made once the individual is stable on maintenance immunosuppression (usually at least 45 days) and in the absence of acute infection (138,(142)(143)(144)147).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [138] Sharif, 2014, Proceedings from an international consensus meeting on posttransplantation diabetes mellitus: recommendations and future directions, Am J Transplant source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [142] Thomas, 2000, Early peri-operative hyperglycaemia and renal allograft rejection in patients without diabetes, BMC Nephrol source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [143] Chakkera, 2009, Hyperglycemia during the immediate period after kidney transplantation, Clin J Am Soc Nephrol source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Medications

    The A1C test may underestimate glycemia in people with HIV, so plasma glucose criteria are preferred to diagnose prediabetes and diabetes.

    “As the A1C test may underestimate glycemia in people with HIV, plasma glucose criteria are preferred to diagnose prediabetes and diabetes (20).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [20] Kim, 2009, A1C underestimates glycemia in HIV infection, Diabetes Care source

      The Abstract Results and Conclusions report that A1C underestimated glycemia in the HIV-infected patients studied. The paper does not recommend plasma glucose criteria over A1C for diagnosing prediabetes or diabetes; its Conclusions instead suggest that fructosamine may be more appropriate for assessing glycemia in this setting. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young

    Correct diagnosis of monogenic forms of diabetes is critical because people who have them may be incorrectly diagnosed with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, leading to suboptimal, even potentially harmful, treatment plans and delays in diagnosing other family members.

    “Correct diagnosis of monogenic forms of diabetes is critical because people who have them may be incorrectly diagnosed with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, leading to suboptimal, even potentially harmful, treatment plans and delays in diagnosing other family members (152).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [152] Greeley, 2022, ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: the diagnosis and management of monogenic diabetes in children and adolescents, Pediatr Diabetes source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.25

    Preconception care of people with known preexisting diabetes results in lower A1C and reduced risk of birth defects, preterm delivery, perinatal mortality, small-for-gestational-age birth weight, and neonatal intensive care unit admission.

    “The preconception care of people with known preexisting diabetes results in lower A1C and reduced risk of birth defects, preterm delivery, perinatal mortality, small-for-gestational-age birth weight, and neonatal intensive care unit admission (173).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [173] Wahabi, 2020, Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of pre-pregnancy care for women with diabetes for improving maternal and perinatal outcomes, PLoS One source

      The Conclusion (page not provided) reports lower HbA1c and reduced congenital malformations, perinatal mortality, and small-for-gestational-age births in women with pregestational diabetes. It says preconception care *may* reduce preterm delivery and NICU admission; the claim presents those two effects as unqualified results. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Community Screening

    Community screening may be poorly targeted; it may fail to reach the groups most at risk and inappropriately test those at very low risk or even those who have already been diagnosed.

    “Community screening may also be poorly targeted; i.e., it may fail to reach the groups most at risk and inappropriately test those at very low risk or even those who have already been diagnosed (110).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [110] Tabaei, 2003, Community-based screening for diabetes in Michigan, Diabetes Care source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young

    Genetic screening (i.e., next-generation sequencing) is increasingly available and cost-effective.

    “Genetic screening (i.e., next-generation sequencing) is increasingly available and cost-effective (152).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [152] Greeley, 2022, ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: the diagnosis and management of monogenic diabetes in children and adolescents, Pediatr Diabetes source

      In ‘Selecting candidates for molecular testing,’ the guidelines say genetic testing is available in many countries and that NGS has a lower cost per gene. They also say NGS panels remain expensive and that cost-effectiveness depends on the condition and selection of patients; the claim presents cost-effectiveness without those qualifications. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.25

    Early abnormal glucose metabolism, defined as a fasting glucose threshold of 110 mg/dL or an A1C of 5.9%, may identify individuals who are at higher risk of adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes (preeclampsia, macrosomia, shoulder dystocia, and perinatal death), are at high risk of a later GDM diagnosis, and are more likely to need insulin treatment.

    “Early abnormal glucose metabolism, defined as a fasting glucose threshold of 110 mg/dL (6.1 mmol/L) or an A1C of 5.9% (41 mmol/mol), may identify individuals who are at higher risk of adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes (preeclampsia, macrosomia, shoulder dystocia, and perinatal death), are at high risk of a later GDM diagnosis, and are more likely to need insulin treatment (174-176).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [174] Zhu, 2013, Evaluation of the value of fasting plasma glucose in the first prenatal visit to diagnose gestational diabetes mellitus in China, Diabetes Care source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [175] Mañé, 2019, Association of first-trimester HbA1c levels with adverse pregnancy outcomes in different ethnic groups, Diabetes Res Clin Pract source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [176] Kattini, 2020, Early gestational diabetes mellitus screening with glycated hemoglobin: a systematic review, J Obstet Gynaecol Can source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § One-Step Strategy

    The OGTT glucose cutoffs in these two trials overlapped the thresholds recommended by the IADPSG, and in one trial the 2-h PG threshold (140 mg/dL [7.8 mmol/L]) was lower than the cutoff recommended by the IADPSG (153 mg/dL [8.5 mmol/L]).

    “The OGTT glucose cutoffs in these two trials overlapped the thresholds recommended by the IADPSG, and in one trial (195), the 2-h PG threshold (140 mg/dL [7.8 mmol/L]) was lower than the cutoff recommended by the IADPSG (153 mg/dL [8.5 mmol/L]).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [195] Crowther, 2005, Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes, N Engl J Med source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Future Considerations

    A systematic review of economic evaluations of GDM screening found that the one-step method identified more cases of GDM and was more likely to be cost-effective than the two-step method.

    “A systematic review of economic evaluations of GDM screening found that the one-step method identified more cases of GDM and was more likely to be cost-effective than the two-step method (211).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [211] Mo, 2021, Economic evaluations of gestational diabetes mellitus screening: a systematic review, J Epidemiol source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.25

    The GDM diagnostic criteria for the 75-g OGTT from the IADPSG and the GDM screening and diagnostic criteria with the two-step approach were not derived from data in the first half of pregnancy.

    “The GDM diagnostic criteria for the 75-g OGTT from the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) and the GDM screening and diagnostic criteria with the two-step approach were not derived from data in the first half of pregnancy”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [179] McIntyre, 2016, Issues with the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in early pregnancy, Diabetes Care source

      In the main text (pp. 53–54), the paper contrasts standard GDM testing at 24–32 weeks with early pregnancy and says evidence is insufficient to recommend early-pregnancy OGTT cutoffs. This supports the point about applying IADPSG criteria in the first half of pregnancy, but the paper does not discuss the derivation of screening or diagnostic criteria for the two-step approach. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § One-Step Strategy

    Post hoc GDM in individuals diagnosed with the one-step method in the HAPO cohort was associated with higher prevalence of IGT; higher 30-min, 1-h, and 2-h glucose levels during the OGTT; and reduced insulin sensitivity and oral disposition index in their offspring at 10-14 years of age compared with offspring of mothers without GDM.

    “Post hoc GDM in individuals diagnosed with this method in the HAPO cohort was associated with higher prevalence of IGT; higher 30-min, 1-h, and 2-h glucose levels during the OGTT; and reduced insulin sensitivity and oral disposition index in their offspring at 10-14 years of age compared with offspring of mothers without GDM.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [198] Lowe, 2019, Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome Follow-up Study (HAPO FUS): maternal gestational diabetes mellitus and childhood glucose metabolism, Diabetes Care source
    • cites [199] Scholtens, 2019, Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome Follow-up Study (HAPO FUS): maternal glycemia and childhood glucose metabolism, Diabetes Care source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § One-Step Strategy

    The one-step strategy was anticipated to significantly increase the incidence of GDM (from 5-6% to 15-20%), primarily because only one abnormal value, not two, became sufficient to make the diagnosis.

    “This one-step strategy was anticipated to significantly increase the incidence of GDM (from 5-6% to 15-20%), primarily because only one abnormal value, not two, became sufficient to make the diagnosis (191).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [191] Sacks, 2012, Frequency of gestational diabetes mellitus at collaborating centers based on IADPSG consensus panel-recommended criteria: the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) study, Diabetes Care source

      The HAPO Study summary (p. 1) says the IADPSG criteria require one or more glucose values at or above threshold and reports a GDM frequency of 17.8%, within the claimed 15–20% range. It does not give a previous rate of 5–6%, describe the increase as anticipated, or establish that the change from two abnormal values to one was its primary cause. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.25

    GDM is often indicative of underlying beta-cell dysfunction, which confers marked increased risk for later development of glucose intolerance and diabetes in the mother after delivery.

    “GDM is often indicative of underlying b-cell dysfunction (182), which confers marked increased risk for later development of glucose intolerance and diabetes in the mother after delivery (183-185).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [182] Buchanan, 2007, What is gestational diabetes?, Diabetes Care source
    • cites [183] Noctor, 2016, Abnormal glucose tolerance post-gestational diabetes mellitus as defined by the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria, Eur J Endocrinol source
    • cites [184] Kim, 2002, Gestational diabetes and the incidence of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review, Diabetes Care source
    • cites [185] Liu, 2023, Risk factors associated with early postpartum glucose intolerance in women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Endocrine source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Two-Step Strategy

    Treatment of higher-threshold maternal hyperglycemia, as identified by the two-step approach, reduces rates of neonatal macrosomia, large-for-gestational-age births, and shoulder dystocia without increasing small-for-gestational-age births.

    “Treatment of higherthreshold maternal hyperglycemia, as identified by the two-step approach, reduces rates of neonatal macrosomia, large-forgestational-age births (207), and shoulder dystocia without increasing small-forgestational-age births.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [207] Farrar, 2017, Treatments for gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis, BMJ Open source

      The Results (Packages of care and dietary modification trials; page unavailable) report reduced macrosomia, large-for-gestational-age births, and shoulder dystocia with treatment compared with routine care. The Discussion says the largest trials used criteria associated with more severe hyperglycaemia, but the review does not limit its pooled finding to women identified by a two-step approach. Its reported outcomes do not establish that treatment leaves small-for-gestational-age births unchanged. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § 2.2a

    A1C is an indirect measure of glucose exposure, and factors that affect hemoglobin concentrations or erythrocyte turnover can affect A1C.

    “A1C is an indirect measure of glucose exposure, and factors that affect hemoglobin concentrations or erythrocyte turnover can affect A1C (e.g., thalassemia or folate deficiency) (Table 2.3).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § TYPE 1 DIABETES

    Children and adolescents often present with DKA as the first manifestation of the disease, and rates in the U.S. have increased over the past 20 years.

    “Children and adolescents often present with DKA as the first manifestation of the disease, and rates in the U.S. have increased over the past 20 years (30)(31)(32).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites (30)(31)(32)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Type 2 diabetes

    In at-risk cohorts followed from birth or a very young age, seroconversion rarely occurs before 6 months of age and there is a peak in seroconversion between 9 and 24 months of age.

    “In at-risk cohorts followed from birth or a very young age, seroconversion rarely occurs before 6 months of age and there is a peak in seroconversion between 9 and 24 months of age (41)(42)(43).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites (41)(42)(43)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Confirming the Diagnosis

    Children with type 1 diabetes often present with the hallmark symptoms of polyuria/polydipsia, and approximately half present with DKA.

    “Children with type 1 diabetes often present with the hallmark symptoms of polyuria/polydipsia, and approximately half present with DKA (30)(31)(32).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites (30)(31)(32)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Confirming the Diagnosis

    The onset of type 1 diabetes may be more variable in adults; they may not present with the classic symptoms seen in children and may progress to insulin replacement more slowly.

    “The onset of type 1 diabetes may be more variable in adults; they may not present with the classic symptoms seen in children and may progress to insulin replacement more slowly (33)(34)(35).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites (33)(34)(35)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Screening and Testing for Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes in Asymptomatic Adults

    Prediabetes and type 2 diabetes meet criteria for conditions in which early detection via screening is appropriate.

    “Prediabetes and type 2 diabetes meet criteria for conditions in which early detection via screening is appropriate.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Prediabetes is a significant risk factor for progression to diabetes as well as cardiovascular disease and several other cardiometabolic outcomes.
    • Rests on an assumption: Prediabetes is associated with obesity (especially abdominal or visceral obesity), dyslipidemia with high triglycerides and/or low HDL cholesterol, and hypertension.
    • Rests on an assumption: Type 2 diabetes occurs more frequently in individuals with prediabetes, prior gestational diabetes mellitus, or polycystic ovary syndrome.
    • Rests on an assumption: Type 2 diabetes is often associated with a strong genetic predisposition or family history in first-degree relatives (more so than type 1 diabetes).
    • Rests on an assumption: Both prediabetes and type 2 diabetes are common and impose significant clinical and public health burdens.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § TYPE 1 DIABETES

    Fulminant onset of type 1 diabetes can occur, with DKA and low or undetectable levels of C-peptide as a marker of endogenous b-cell function.

    “Fulminant onset of type 1 diabetes can occur, with DKA and low or undetectable levels of C-peptide as a marker of endogenous b-cell function (63)(64)(65).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites (63)(64)(65)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Screening for Type 1 Diabetes Risk

    The findings in all three groups were the same, suggesting that the same sequence of events led to clinical disease in both sporadic and familial cases of type 1 diabetes.

    “Remarkably, the findings in all three groups were the same, suggesting that the same sequence of events led to clinical disease in both “sporadic” and familial cases of type 1”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Screening for Type 1 Diabetes Risk

    People with type 1 diabetes often present with acute symptoms of diabetes and markedly elevated blood glucose levels, and 25-50% are diagnosed with life-threatening DKA.

    “People with type 1 diabetes often present with acute symptoms of diabetes and markedly elevated blood glucose levels, and 25-50% are diagnosed with life-threatening DKA (30)(31)(32).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites (30)(31)(32)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Screening for Type 1 Diabetes Risk

    The incidence and prevalence of type 1 diabetes are increasing.

    “The incidence and prevalence of type 1 diabetes are increasing (70).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [70] Gregory, 2022, Global incidence, prevalence, and mortality of type 1 diabetes in 2021 with projection to 2040: a modelling study, Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Type 2 Diabetes

    The risk of developing type 2 diabetes increases with age, obesity, and lack of physical activity.

    “The risk of developing type 2 diabetes increases with age, obesity, and lack of physical activity (95,96).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [95] U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Statistics Report. Estimates of Diabetes and Its Burden in the United States. Accessed 11 September 2024. Available from https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/php/data-research/index.html

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [96] International Diabetes Federation . IDF Diabetes Atlas, 10th edition. Brussels, Belgium, International Diabetes Federation,2021. Accessed 5 August 2024. Available from https://www.diabetesatlas.org/atlas/tenth-edition/

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § TYPE 1 DIABETES

    During the COVID-19 pandemic, numbers of cases of hyperglycemia, DKA, and new diabetes increased, suggesting that SARS-CoV-2 is a trigger for or can unmask type 1 diabetes.

    “During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, numbers of cases of hyperglycemia, DKA, and new diabetes increased, suggesting that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a trigger for or can unmask type 1 diabetes (68).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [68] Wang, 2023, COVID-19 as a trigger for type 1 diabetes, J Clin Endocrinol Metab source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young

    A diagnosis of one of the three most common forms of MODY, HNF1A-MODY, GCK-MODY, and HNF4A-MODY, allows for more cost-effective personalized therapy (i.e., no therapy for GCK-MODY and sulfonylureas as first-line therapy for HNF1A-MODY and HNF4A-MODY).

    “A diagnosis of one of the three most common forms of MODY, HNF1A-MODY, GCK-MODY, and HNF4A-MODY, allows for more cost-effective personalized therapy (i.e., no therapy for GCK-MODY and sulfonylureas as first-line therapy for HNF1A-MODY and HNF4A-MODY).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Testing Interval

    The rationale for the 3-year interval is that with this interval, the number of false-positive tests that require confirmatory testing will be reduced, and individuals with false-negative tests will be retested before substantial time elapses and complications develop.

    “The rationale for the 3-year interval is that with this interval, the number of false-positive tests that require confirmatory testing will be reduced, and individuals with false-negative tests will be retested before substantial time elapses and complications develop (109).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [109] Johnson, 2005, The efficacy and cost of alternative strategies for systematic screening for type 2 diabetes in the U.S. population 45-74 years of age, Diabetes Care source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Cystic Fibrosis-Related Diabetes

    Annual OGTTs are perceived as burdensome, and engagement in current CFRD screening guidelines is poor, with only 30% of adults with cystic fibrosis having annual OGTTs.

    “Not unexpectedly, annual OGTTs are perceived as burdensome, and engagement in current CFRD screening guidelines is poor, with only 30% of adults with cystic fibrosis having annual OGTTs (128).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [128] Cystic Fibrosis Foundation . Patient Registry 2022 Annual Data Report. Bethesda, MD, Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, 2022. Accessed 5 August 2024. Available from https://www.cff.org/media/31216/download

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Medications

    New-onset diabetes is estimated to occur in more than 5% of individuals infected with HIV on PIs, whereas more than 15% may have prediabetes.

    “New-onset diabetes is estimated to occur in more than 5% of individuals infected with HIV on PIs, whereas more than 15% may have prediabetes (107).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [107] Monroe, 2015, Diagnosing and managing diabetes in HIV-infected patients: current concepts, Clin Infect Dis source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 2.25

    Many cases of GDM represent preexisting hyperglycemia that is detected by routine screening in pregnancy, as routine screening is not widely performed in nonpregnant individuals of reproductive age.

    “First, the best evidence reveals that many cases of GDM represent preexisting hyperglycemia that is detected by routine screening in pregnancy, as routine screening is not widely performed in nonpregnant individuals of reproductive age.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Routine screening for diabetes is not widely performed in nonpregnant individuals of reproductive age.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Cystic Fibrosis-Related Diabetes

    The European Cystic Fibrosis Society Patient Registry reported an increase in CFRD with age (10% increase per decade), genotype, decreased lung function, and female sex.

    “The European Cystic Fibrosis Society Patient Registry reported an increase in CFRD with age (10% increase per decade), genotype, decreased lung function, and female sex (133).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [133] Olesen, 2020, Cystic fibrosis related diabetes in Europe: prevalence, risk factors and outcome, J Cyst Fibros source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young

    Diagnosis of MODY can lead to identification of other affected family members and can indicate potential extrapancreatic complications in affected individuals.

    “Additionally, diagnosis can lead to identification of other affected family members and can indicate potential extrapancreatic complications in affected individuals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.25

    There was a suggestion of more benefit (per prespecified subgroup analyses) among individuals who had the OGTT at less than 14 weeks and among those with OGTT glycemic values in higher ranges.

    “There was also a suggestion of more benefit (per prespecified subgroup analyses) among individuals who had the OGTT at <14 weeks and among those with OGTT glycemic values in higher ranges (180).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [180] Simmons, 2023, Treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosed early in pregnancy, N Engl J Med source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 2.25

    A1C is not reliable for screening for GDM or for preexisting diabetes at 15 weeks of gestation or later in part from the higher red blood cell turnover in pregnancy but also from the unknown diabetes status prior to pregnancy, which could help distinguish new-onset diabetes from preexisting diabetes.

    “A1C is not reliable for screening for GDM or for preexisting diabetes at 15 weeks of gestation or later in part from the higher red blood cell turnover in pregnancy but also from the unknown diabetes status prior to pregnancy, which could help distinguish new-onset diabetes from preexisting diabetes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [181] Cavagnolli, 2015, Factors affecting A1C in non-diabetic individuals: review and meta-analysis, Clin Chim Acta source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § One-Step Strategy

    The one-step method identifies long-term risks of maternal prediabetes and diabetes as well as offspring glucose intolerance and adiposity.

    “The one-step method identifies longterm risks of maternal prediabetes and diabetes as well as offspring glucose intolerance and adiposity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Two-Step Strategy

    If the two-step approach is implemented, the incidence of GDM will likely increase markedly.

    “If this approach is implemented, the incidence of GDM will likely increase markedly.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Two-Step Strategy

    A 2021 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force systematic review concluded that one-step versus two-step screening is associated with increased likelihood of GDM (11.5% vs. 4.9%) but without improved health outcomes.

    “A 2021 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force systematic review concluded that onestep versus two-step screening is associated with increased likelihood of GDM (11.5% vs. 4.9%) but without improved health outcomes (205).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [205] Pillay, 2021

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

59 of 59
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A1C reflects glucose bound to hemoglobin over the life span of the erythrocyte (120 days) and is thus a weighted average that is more heavily affected by recent blood glucose exposure.

    “A1C reflects glucose bound to hemoglobin over the life span of the erythrocyte (120 days) and is thus a “weighted” average that is more heavily affected by recent blood glucose exposure.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Some hemoglobin variants can interfere with A1C test results, but this depends on the specific assay.

    “Some hemoglobin variants can interfere with A1C test results, but this depends on the specific assay.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Other features classically associated with type 1 diabetes, such as ketosis without acidosis, osmotic symptoms, family history, or a history of autoimmune diseases, are weak discriminators.

    “Other features classically associated with type 1 diabetes, such as ketosis without acidosis, osmotic symptoms, family history, or a history of autoimmune diseases, are weak discriminators.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, genetic and environmental factors can result in the progressive loss of b-cell mass and/or function that manifests clinically as hyperglycemia.

    “In both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, genetic and environmental factors can result in the progressive loss of b-cell mass and/or function that manifests clinically as hyperglycemia.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Once hyperglycemia occurs, people with all forms of diabetes are at risk for developing the same chronic complications, although rates of progression may differ.

    “Once hyperglycemia occurs, people with all forms of diabetes are at risk for developing the same chronic complications, although rates of progression may differ.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The rate of progression of type 1 diabetes is dependent on the age at first detection of an autoantibody, number of autoantibodies, autoantibody specificity, and autoantibody titer.

    “The rate of progression is dependent on the age at first detection of an autoantibody, number of autoantibodies, autoantibody specificity, and autoantibody titer.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Application of only a single imperfect autoantibody test for determining LADA classification may lead to misclassification of some individuals with type 2 diabetes.

    “At the same time, there is evidence that application of only a single imperfect autoantibody test for determining LADA classification may lead to misclassification of some individuals with type 2 diabetes.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The paths to b-cell demise and dysfunction are less well defined in type 2 diabetes, but deficient b-cell insulin secretion, frequently in the setting of insulin resistance, appears to be the common denominator.

    “The paths to b-cell demise and dysfunction are less well defined in type 2 diabetes, but deficient b-cell insulin secretion, frequently in the setting of insulin resistance, appears to be the common denominator.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Type 2 diabetes is associated with insulin secretory defects related to genetic predisposition, epigenetic changes, inflammation, and metabolic stress.

    “Type 2 diabetes is associated with insulin secretory defects related to genetic predisposition, epigenetic changes, inflammation, and metabolic stress.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Immune-mediated diabetes is the most common form of diabetes in childhood and adolescence, but it can occur at any age.

    “Immune-mediated diabetes is the most common form of diabetes in childhood and adolescence, but it can occur at any age.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    People with type 1 diabetes are also prone to other autoimmune disorders, such as Hashimoto thyroiditis, Graves disease, celiac disease, Addison disease, vitiligo, autoimmune hepatitis, myasthenia gravis, and pernicious anemia.

    “People with type 1 diabetes are also prone to other autoimmune disorders, such as Hashimoto thyroiditis, Graves disease, celiac disease, Addison disease, vitiligo, autoimmune hepatitis, myasthenia gravis, and pernicious anemia (see Section 4, “Comprehensive Medical Evaluation and Assessment of Comorbidities”).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Risk of checkpoint inhibitor-associated type 1 diabetes cannot be predicted by family history or autoantibodies.

    “To date, risk cannot be predicted by family history or autoantibodies, so all health care professionals administering these medications or caring for people who have a history of current or past exposure to these agents should be mindful of this adverse effect and educate and monitor individuals appropriately.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A number of viruses have been associated with type 1 diabetes, including enteroviruses such as Coxsackievirus B.

    “A number of viruses have been associated with type 1 diabetes, including enteroviruses such as Coxsackievirus B.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Family history of type 1 diabetes increases the risk of developing type 1 diabetes compared with the general population, but the majority, 90%, of individuals who develop type 1 diabetes do not have a known relative with the disease.

    “Family history of type 1 diabetes increases the risk of developing type 1 diabetes compared with the general population, but the majority, 90%, of individuals who develop type 1 diabetes do not have a known relative with the disease.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Prediabetes is a significant risk factor for progression to diabetes as well as cardiovascular disease and several other cardiometabolic outcomes.

    “As prediabetes is an intermediate state between normoglycemia and diabetes, it is a significant risk factor for progression to diabetes as well as cardiovascular disease and several other cardiometabolic outcomes.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Prediabetes is associated with obesity (especially abdominal or visceral obesity), dyslipidemia with high triglycerides and/or low HDL cholesterol, and hypertension.

    “Prediabetes is associated with obesity (especially abdominal or visceral obesity), dyslipidemia with high triglycerides and/or low HDL cholesterol, and hypertension.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Type 2 diabetes occurs more frequently in individuals with prediabetes, prior gestational diabetes mellitus, or polycystic ovary syndrome.

    “It occurs more frequently in individuals with prediabetes, prior gestational diabetes mellitus, or polycystic ovary syndrome.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Type 2 diabetes is often associated with a strong genetic predisposition or family history in first-degree relatives (more so than type 1 diabetes).

    “It is often associated with a strong genetic predisposition or family history in firstdegree relatives (more so than type 1 diabetes).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Both prediabetes and type 2 diabetes are common and impose significant clinical and public health burdens.

    “Both conditions are common and impose significant clinical and public health burdens.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is often a long presymptomatic phase before the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes.

    “There is often a long presymptomatic phase before the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The duration of glycemic burden is a strong predictor of adverse outcomes.

    “The duration of glycemic burden is a strong predictor of adverse outcomes.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There are effective interventions that prevent progression from prediabetes to diabetes.

    “There are effective interventions that prevent progression from prediabetes to diabetes.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Many people in the U.S. and globally either remain undiagnosed or are diagnosed late, when complications have already arisen.

    “Despite the numerous benefits of screening and early diagnosis for prediabetes or diabetes, unfortunately many people in the U.S. and globally either remain undiagnosed or are diagnosed late, when complications have already arisen.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Age is a major risk factor for diabetes.

    “Age is a major risk factor for diabetes.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    30-50% of people with KATP-related neonatal diabetes will exhibit improved blood glucose levels when treated with high-dose oral sulfonylureas instead of insulin.

    “30-50% of people with K ATP -related neonatal diabetes will exhibit improved blood glucose levels when treated with high-dose oral sulfonylureas instead of insulin.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Routine screening for diabetes is not widely performed in nonpregnant individuals of reproductive age.

    “as routine screening is not widely performed in nonpregnant individuals of reproductive age.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Strong racial and ethnic disparities exist in the prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes.

    “Strong racial and ethnic disparities exist in the prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Most randomized controlled trials of treatment of early abnormal glucose metabolism have been underpowered for outcomes.

    “Most randomized controlled trials of treatment of early abnormal glucose metabolism have been underpowered for outcomes.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The IADPSG criteria (one-step strategy) have been adopted internationally as the preferred approach.

    “The IADPSG criteria (one-step strategy) have been adopted internationally as the preferred approach.”
29 of 29

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Guidelines from the ADA and WHO recommend alternative diagnostic approaches, such as fasting glucose, OGTT, or short-term glycation markers, when hemoglobinopathies are suspected or confirmed.

    “Guidelines from the ADA and WHO recommend alternative diagnostic approaches, such as fasting glucose, OGTT, or short-term glycation markers (such as fructosamine and glycated albumin), when hemoglobinopathies are suspected or confirmed (47,48).”

    From Comparison of point‑of‑care HbA1c devices with laboratory HPLC methods: A systematic review and meta‑analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [48]

    Recommendation 2.4 (section 2.2a; page unavailable) says to use plasma-glucose criteria for diagnosis when some hemoglobin variants alter the relationship between A1C and glycemia; section 2.1a includes fasting glucose and OGTT among those criteria. The paper does not recommend fructosamine or glycated albumin as diagnostic alternatives: “Confirming the Diagnosis” describes them as measures approved for monitoring glycemic management. It also says an A1C assay without variant interference can be used for some people with a hemoglobin variant. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Intensified surveillance is also warranted in those with prior gestational diabetes (GDM), due to increased T2D risk.

    “Intensified surveillance is also warranted in those with prior gestational diabetes (GDM), due to increased T2D risk.46”
  • Several studies found that GLP-1-based therapies would not be cost-effective compared with usual care, especially when used as first-line therapy.

    “In general, these studies found that GLP-1–based therapies would not be cost-effective compared with usual care, especially when used as first-line therapy.”

    From 2026 AHA/ACC/ADA/ASN Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome (2026) · cites this paper as [46]

    Our copy discusses cost-effectiveness in relation to diabetes screening and genetic diagnosis, including gestational diabetes screening in “Future Considerations” (page unavailable). Searches for GLP-1, usual care, and first-line therapy found no passage assessing the cost-effectiveness of GLP-1–based therapies. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • GLP-1 RAs appear to primarily reduce the risk of atherosclerotic events, such as MI and stroke.

    “In contrast, GLP-1 RAs appear to primarily reduce the risk of atherosclerotic events, such as MI and stroke.45–48”

    From 2026 AHA/ACC/ADA/ASN Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome (2026) · cites this paper as [46]

    The Medications passage discusses drugs associated with diabetes risk, while Diagnosis of Prediabetes discusses cardiovascular risk associated with A1C; neither addresses cardiovascular effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists. Searches for GLP-1, atherosclerotic events, MI, and stroke found no passage in our copy supporting the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Current data do not determine whether HF event risk is greater with sodium zirconium cyclosilicate versus patiromer.

    “Current data do not determine whether HF event risk is greater with sodium zirconium cyclosilicate versus patiromer.46”

    From 2026 AHA/ACC/ADA/ASN Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome (2026) · cites this paper as [46]

    The supplied passages concern diabetes diagnosis, and searches of the indexed paper for sodium zirconium cyclosilicate, patiromer, potassium binders, and heart-failure risk found no passage comparing heart-failure events with the two drugs. Our copy therefore does not address the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. International Diabetes Federation . IDF Diabetes Atlas, 10th edition. Brussels, Belgium, International Diabetes Federation,2021. Accessed 5 August 2024. Available from https://www.diabetesatlas.org/atlas/tenth-edition/
  2. 2018, Atypical diabetes: pathophysiology, clinical presentations, and treatment options.
  3. Pillay, 2021, US Preventative Services Task Force Evidence Syntheses, formerly Systematic Evidence Reviews.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, ElSayed, N. A., McCoy, R. G., Aleppo, G., Balapattabi, K., Beverly, E. A., Briggs Early, K., Bruemmer, D., Ebekozien, O., Echouffo-Tcheugui, J. B., Ekhlaspour, L., Gaglia, J. L., Garg, R., Khunti, K., Lal, R., Lingvay, I., Matfin, G., Pandya, N., Pekas, E. J., Pilla, S. J., Polsky, S., Segal, A. R., Seley, J. J., Selvin, E., Stanton, R. C., & Bannuru, R. R.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2024-12-09
Volume
48
Issue
Supplement_1
Pages
S27-S49
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W4405187673
Cited by
1,393
References
213
Citations by year
2026: 716 · 2025: 608 · 2024: 69
FWCI
81.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K23DK121942)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
diabetes diagnosis, diabetes classification, diabetes mellitus, clinical guidelines, quality of care, treatment goals
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Standard of Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-14.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-14.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review