2. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes: standards of care in diabetes-2025
Open accessAbstract
The American Diabetes Association (ADA) “Standards of Care in Diabetes” includes the ADA’s current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, an interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA’s clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
98 of 147 cited sources checked · 43 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation§ 2.2a
The association of A1C with risk for complications appears to be similar in African American and non-Hispanic White populations.
“Reassuringly, studies have shown that the association of A1C with risk for complications appears to be similar in African American and non-Hispanic White populations (28).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] Selvin, 2013, No racial differences in the association of glycated hemoglobin with kidney disease and cardiovascular outcomes, Diabetes Care source
- Premisecitation§ 2.2a
X-linked glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase G202A, carried by 11% of African American individuals in the U.S., is associated with a decrease in A1C of about 0.8% in homozygous men and 0.7% in homozygous women compared with levels in individuals without the variant.
“Another genetic variant, X-linked glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase G202A, carried by 11% of African American individuals in the U.S., is associated with a decrease in A1C of about 0.8% in homozygous men and 0.7% in homozygous women compared with levels in individuals without the variant (21).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] Wheeler, 2017, Impact of common genetic determinants of hemoglobin A1c on type 2 diabetes risk and diagnosis in ancestrally diverse populations: a transethnic genome-wide meta-analysis, PLoS Med source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation§ Type 2 diabetes
Glucose and A1C levels may rise well before the clinical onset of diabetes (e.g., changes in FPG and 2-h PG can occur about 6 months before diagnosis).
“Glucose and A1C levels may rise well before the clinical onset of diabetes (e.g., changes in FPG and 2-h PG can occur about 6 months before diagnosis) (44), making diagnosis feasible under ideal situations of serial monitoring of individuals at high risk of type 1 diabetes before the onset of DKA.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [44] Bogun, 2020, C-peptide levels in subjects followed longitudinally before and after type 1 diabetes diagnosis in TrialNet, Diabetes Care source
The Results report that mean fasting and 2-hour glucose levels began rising about six months before clinical type 1 diabetes diagnosis, supporting the glucose portion of the claim. Our copy does not report a prediagnosis rise in A1C (searched: A1C, HbA1c), so that part is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation§ Confirming the Diagnosis
Confirmation of diabetes diagnosis can be accomplished by two abnormal screening test results, measured either at the same time or at two different time points.
“This can be accomplished by two abnormal screening test results, measured either at the same time (29) or at two different time points.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] Selvin, 2018, Prognostic implications of single-sample confirmatory testing for undiagnosed diabetes: a prospective cohort study, Ann Intern Med source
- Premisecitation§ Use of Fasting Plasma Glucose or 2-Hour Plasma Glucose for Screening and Diagnosis of Diabetes
Antecedent carbohydrate restriction in the days prior to OGTT can falsely elevate postchallenge glucose levels, potentially resulting in a false-positive OGTT.
“Antecedent carbohydrate restriction in the days prior to OGTT can falsely elevate postchallenge glucose levels, potentially resulting in a false-positive OGTT (12).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Klein, 2021, Carbohydrate intake prior to oral glucose tolerance testing, J Endocr Soc source
- Premisecitation§ Type 2 diabetes
Individuals with maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) may be misdiagnosed as having type 1 diabetes.
“In comparison, individuals with maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) may be misdiagnosed as having type 1 diabetes (36).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] Holt, 2021, The management of type 1 diabetes in adults. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD), Diabetes Care source
- Premisecitation§ Type 2 diabetes
The persistent presence of two or more islet autoantibodies is a near-certain predictor of clinical diabetes.
“It is clear from prospective studies that the persistent presence of two or more islet autoantibodies is a near-certain predictor of clinical diabetes (40).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [40] Ziegler, 2013, Seroconversion to multiple islet autoantibodies and risk of progression to diabetes in children, JAMA source
The Results (Children With Multiple Islet Autoantibodies; page unavailable) show that multiple autoantibodies strongly predicted type 1 diabetes in the children studied: estimated progression was 69.7% at 10 years and 84.2% at 15 years. The claim’s unqualified “near-certain” prediction overstates those estimates and extends the finding beyond the studied children. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation§ Screening for Type 1 Diabetes Risk
Measuring islet autoantibodies in relatives of those with type 1 diabetes, in children from the general population, or in children from the general population with high genetic risk can identify many individuals who will develop type 1 diabetes.
“Multiple studies indicate that measuring islet autoantibodies in relatives of those with type 1 diabetes (45), in children from the general population (71,72), or in children from the general population with high genetic risk (73) can identify many individuals who will develop type 1 diabetes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim4 of 4 sources checked- cites [45] Insel, 2015, Staging presymptomatic type 1 diabetes: a scientific statement of JDRF, the Endocrine Society, and the American Diabetes Association, Diabetes Care source
- cites [71] McQueen, 2020, Cost and cost-effectiveness of large-scale screening for type 1 diabetes in Colorado, Diabetes Care source
- cites [72] Ziegler, 2020, Yield of a public health screening of children for islet autoantibodies in Bavaria, Germany, JAMA source
- cites [73] Hagopian, 2011, The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY): genetic criteria and international diabetes risk screening of 421 000 infants, Pediatr Diabetes source
The Introduction (page unavailable) says TEDDY used genetic screening to identify infants at increased risk and then monitored them for islet autoantibodies and type 1 diabetes. The Discussion (page unavailable) describes HLA-based risk stratification in general-population and first-degree-relative groups. Neither passage establishes that measuring autoantibodies identifies many children who will later develop type 1 diabetes. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation§ Diagnosis of Prediabetes
A1C of 5.7% or higher is associated with a diabetes risk similar to that of the high-risk participants in the Diabetes Prevention Program.
“Other analyses suggest that A1C of 5.7% (39 mmol/mol) or higher is associated with a diabetes risk similar to that of the high-risk participants in the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) (88), and A1C at baseline was a strong predictor of the development of glucose-defined diabetes during the DPP and its follow-up ( 7).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [88] Ackermann, 2011, Identifying adults at high risk for diabetes and cardiovascular disease using hemoglobin A1c National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-2006, Am J Prev Med source
- cites [7] Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group, 2015, HbA1c as a predictor of diabetes and as an outcome in the Diabetes Prevention Program: a randomized clinical trial, Diabetes Care source
- Premisecitation§ Screening for Type 1 Diabetes Risk
In the TEDDY study, type 1 diabetes developed in 21% of 363 subjects with at least one autoantibody at 3 years of age.
“In The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY) study, type 1 diabetes developed in 21% of 363 subjects with at least one autoantibody at 3 years of age (76).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [76] Jacobsen, 2019, Predicting progression to type 1 diabetes from ages 3 to 6 in islet autoantibody positive TEDDY children, Pediatr Diabetes source
- Premisecitation§ Diagnosis of Prediabetes
Several prospective studies that used A1C to predict the progression to diabetes demonstrated a strong, continuous curvilinear association between A1C and subsequent diabetes.
“As with the glucose measures, several prospective studies that used A1C to predict the progression to diabetes demonstrated a strong, continuous curvilinear association between A1C and subsequent diabetes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [86] Zhang, 2010, A1C level and future risk of diabetes: a systematic review, Diabetes Care source
- Premisecitation§ Screening and Testing for Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes in Asymptomatic Adults
Risk models have explored the benefit, in general finding higher benefit of intervention in those at highest risk.
“Risk models have explored the benefit, in general finding higher benefit of intervention in those at highest risk (99)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [99] Sussman, 2015, Improving diabetes prevention with benefit based tailored treatment: risk based reanalysis of Diabetes Prevention Program, BMJ source
- Premisecitation§ Screening for Type 1 Diabetes Risk
In a simulation using one such genetic risk score, the majority of those who would go on to develop type 1 diabetes, >77%, could be identified within just 10% of the general population.
“In a simulation using one such genetic risk score, the majority of those who would go on to develop type 1 diabetes, >77%, could be identified within just 10% of the general population, identifying a subset who may most benefit from autoantibody testing (81).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [81] Sharp, 2019, Development and standardization of an improved type 1 diabetes genetic risk score for use in newborn screening and incident diagnosis, Diabetes Care source
- Premisecitation§ Diagnosis of Prediabetes
In a systematic review of 44,203 individuals from 16 cohort studies with a follow-up interval averaging 5.6 years, those with A1C between 5.5% and 6.0% had a substantially increased risk of diabetes (5-year incidence from 9% to 25%).
“In a systematic review of 44,203 individuals from 16 cohort studies with a follow-up interval averaging 5.6 years (range 2.8-12 years), those with A1C between 5.5% and 6.0% (between 37 and 42 mmol/mol) had a substantially increased risk of diabetes (5-year incidence from 9% to 25%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [86] Zhang, 2010, A1C level and future risk of diabetes: a systematic review, Diabetes Care source
- Premisecitation§ Diagnosis of Prediabetes
In a community-based study of African American and non-Hispanic White adults without diabetes, baseline A1C was a stronger predictor of subsequent diabetes and cardiovascular events than fasting glucose.
“In a community-based study of African American and non-Hispanic White adults without diabetes, baseline A1C was a stronger predictor of subsequent diabetes and cardiovascular events than fasting glucose (87).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [87] Selvin, 2010, Glycated hemoglobin, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk in nondiabetic adults, N Engl J Med source
The Abstract Conclusions say that glycated hemoglobin was more strongly associated with cardiovascular disease risk than fasting glucose, but only similarly associated with diabetes risk. The claim overstates the diabetes comparison. (LLM, conf=0.93)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation§ Screening and Testing for Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes in Asymptomatic Adults
In the DPPOS report, prevention of progression from prediabetes to diabetes resulted in lower rates of developing retinopathy and nephropathy.
“In the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study (DPPOS) report, prevention of progression from prediabetes to diabetes (101) resulted in lower rates of developing retinopathy and nephropathy (102).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [101] Perreault, 2017, Exploring residual risk for diabetes and microvascular disease in the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study (DPPOS), Diabet Med source
The Introduction (page unavailable) says that preventing or delaying diabetes was associated with a lower prevalence of microvascular disease. It does not establish that prevention resulted in lower rates of retinopathy and nephropathy specifically; it also says the treatment groups’ different diabetes rates did not generally produce corresponding differences in microvascular disease prevalence. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [102] Nathan, 2019, Does diabetes prevention translate into reduced long-term vascular complications of diabetes?, Diabetologia source
The DPPOS microvascular-complications section reports 28% lower prevalence of a composite outcome among participants who did not develop diabetes; the composite included retinopathy, nephropathy and neuropathy. It does not establish lower rates of developing retinopathy and nephropathy separately, nor that preventing diabetes caused those reductions. The same section reports no significant difference in these outcomes among the three intervention groups after a mean 15 years. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation§ TYPE 1 DIABETES
Type 1 diabetes can be associated with monogenic polyglandular autoimmune syndromes, including IPEX syndrome and another disorder caused by AIRE gene mutation.
“Type 1 diabetes can be associated with monogenic polyglandular autoimmune syndromes, including immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, and X-linked (IPEX) syndrome, which is an early-onset systemic autoimmune, genetic disorder caused by mutation of the forkhead box protein 3 (FOXP3) gene, and another disorder caused by the autoimmune regulator (AIRE) gene mutation (61,62).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [61] Ben-Skowronek, 2021, IPEX syndrome: genetics and treatment options, Genes (Basel) source
The Introduction identifies IPEX as an autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome caused by FOXP3 dysfunction, and section 4.2 says type 1 diabetes may develop in affected children. The cited paper does not address the additional AIRE-mutation disorder; a search for AIRE found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [62] Frommer, 2019, Autoimmune polyendocrinopathy, J Clin Endocrinol Metab source
- Premisecitation§ Diagnosis of Prediabetes
As A1C rises, the diabetes risk rises disproportionately.
“Similar to glucose measurements, the continuum of risk is continuous and curvilinear: as A1C rises, the diabetes risk rises disproportionately (86).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [86] Zhang, 2010, A1C level and future risk of diabetes: a systematic review, Diabetes Care source
- Premisecitation§ Medications
Certain medications, such as glucocorticoids, statins, thiazide diuretics, some HIV medications, and second-generation antipsychotic medications, are known to increase the risk of prediabetes or diabetes.
“Certain medications, such as glucocorticoids, statins (104), thiazide diuretics, some HIV medications (19), and secondgeneration antipsychotic medications (105), should be considered when deciding whether to screen for prediabetes or diabetes, as these medications are known to increase the risks of these conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [104] Mansi, 2023, Risk of diabetes with statins, BMJ source
- cites [19] Eckhardt, 2012, Glycated hemoglobin A(1c) as screening for diabetes mellitus in HIV-infected individuals, AIDS Patient Care STDS source
- cites [105] American Diabetes Association, American Psychiatric Association, American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, North American Association for the Study of Obesity, 2004, Consensus development conference on antipsychotic drugs and obesity and diabetes, Diabetes Care source
- Premisecitation§ Screening for Type 1 Diabetes Risk
In several cohort studies, up to 50% of children with only a single autoantibody revert to being islet autoantibody negative during follow-up.
“In several cohort studies, up to 50% of children with only a single autoantibody revert to being islet autoantibody negative during follow-up (79,80).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [79] Kimpimäki, 2002, Natural history of beta-cell autoimmunity in young children with increased genetic susceptibility to type 1 diabetes recruited from the general population, J Clin Endocrinol Metab source
The Inverse seroconversions section reports that 29 of 63 antibody-positive children (46%) became antibody-negative during follow-up, and all 29 had tested positive for only one autoantibody. The 46% figure uses all antibody-positive children as its denominator, not children with only a single autoantibody, so it does not establish the claimed rate for that subgroup. The paper also reports its own cohort and discusses other studies, rather than establishing a 50% rate across several cohorts. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [80] Vehik, 2016, Reversion of β-cell autoimmunity changes risk of type 1 diabetes: TEDDY study, Diabetes Care source
The available passages are contributor lists and committee descriptions (The Teddy Study Group, p. 1; Supplementary Data, p. 2), not findings on autoantibody reversion. Searches for single-autoantibody reversion and 50% returned no passage reporting a reversion rate; the decisive study text may be missing from our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation§ Screening for Type 1 Diabetes Risk
The risk of type 1 diabetes increases as the number of relevant autoantibodies detected increases.
“Indeed, the risk of type 1 diabetes increases as the number of relevant autoantibodies detected increases (53,74,75).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [53] Steck, 2015, Predictors of progression from the appearance of islet autoantibodies to early childhood diabetes: The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY), Diabetes Care source
- cites [74] Orban, 2009, Pancreatic islet autoantibodies as predictors of type 1 diabetes in the Diabetes Prevention Trial-Type 1, Diabetes Care source
- cites [75] Sosenko, 2013, The prediction of type 1 diabetes by multiple autoantibody levels and their incorporation into an autoantibody risk score in relatives of type 1 diabetic patients, Diabetes Care source
The Results (page not provided) compare the predictive accuracy of autoantibody number with that of the autoantibody risk score, supporting the relevance of number to risk prediction. But the paper does not establish that risk increases with each additional detected autoantibody; the Conclusions caution that number alone can misclassify risk because antibody type and level also matter. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation§ POSTTRANSPLANTATION DIABETES MELLITUS
The clinical importance of PTDM lies in its impact as a significant risk factor for cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease in solid-organ transplantation.
“The clinical importance of PTDM lies in its impact as a significant risk factor for cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease in solid-organ transplantation (137).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [137] Shivaswamy, 2016, Post-transplant diabetes mellitus: causes, treatment, and impact on outcomes, Endocr Rev source
The section on kidney transplant outcomes reports substantially increased cardiovascular events in recipients with PTDM. The section on other organ transplant groups reports a higher incidence of chronic kidney disease in one study of liver transplant recipients with PTDM. These findings support both concerns, but the paper does not establish PTDM as a significant risk factor for both outcomes across solid-organ transplantation generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation§ MONOGENIC DIABETES SYNDROMES
Monogenic defects that cause beta-cell dysfunction or insulin resistance syndromes are present in a small fraction of people with diabetes (<5%).
“Monogenic defects that cause b-cell dysfunction (e.g., neonatal diabetes and MODY) or insulin resistance syndromes (e.g., monogenic lipodystrophies) are present in a small fraction of people with diabetes (<5%) (152).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [152] Greeley, 2022, ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: the diagnosis and management of monogenic diabetes in children and adolescents, Pediatr Diabetes source
The Specific Subtypes section identifies β-cell dysfunction and severe insulin resistance as causes of monogenic diabetes in children, and the Monogenic Lipodystrophies section describes an insulin-resistant example. The MODY section calls monogenic diabetes uncommon but estimates 2.5%–6% of pediatric diabetes cases; it does not establish a <5% prevalence among people with diabetes generally. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation§ Screening and Testing for Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes in Children and Adolescents
In the last decade, the incidence and prevalence of type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents has increased dramatically, especially in certain high-risk racial, ethnic, and ancestral subgroups.
“In the last decade, the incidence and prevalence of type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents has increased dramatically, especially in certain high-risk racial, ethnic, and ancestral subgroups (115).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [115] Wagenknecht, 2023, Trends in incidence of youth-onset type 1 and type 2 diabetes in the USA, 2002-18: results from the population-based SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth study, Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol source
The Results report that youth type 2 diabetes incidence rose from 9.0 to 17.9 cases per 100,000 per year between 2002–03 and 2017–18, with the largest annual increases among Asian/Pacific Islander, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic Black youth. The Discussion says these findings give evidence for a rise in prevalence, but the paper does not establish a dramatic prevalence increase or show that prevalence rose especially in those subgroups. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation§ 2.25
An A1C threshold of 5.7% has not been shown to be associated with adverse perinatal outcomes.
“An A1C threshold of 5.7% (39 mmol/L) has not been shown to be associated with adverse perinatal outcomes (177,178).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation§ POSTTRANSPLANTATION DIABETES MELLITUS
Most studies have reported that transplant individuals with hyperglycemia and PTDM after transplantation have higher rates of rejection, infection, and rehospitalization.
“Most studies have reported that transplant individuals with hyperglycemia and PTDM after transplantation have higher rates of rejection, infection, and rehospitalization (142,144,151).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [142] Thomas, 2000, Early peri-operative hyperglycaemia and renal allograft rejection in patients without diabetes, BMC Nephrol source
The Results report more acute rejection among kidney-transplant recipients with early peri-operative hyperglycaemia, and the Discussion also cites prior findings in recipients with diabetes. The paper does not report higher infection or rehospitalization rates, nor does it establish those outcomes specifically for recipients with post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM). (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [144] Wallia, 2016, Diabetes care after transplant: definitions, risk factors, and clinical management, Med Clin North Am source
- cites [151] Thomas, 2001, Early peri-operative glycaemic control and allograft rejection in patients with diabetes mellitus: a pilot study, Transplantation source
- Premisecitation§ Screening in Dental Practices
There is a bidirectional relationship between periodontal disease and diabetes.
“Because of the bidirectional relationship between periodontal disease and diabetes, the utility of screening in a dental setting and referral to primary care as a means to improve the diagnosis of prediabetes and diabetes has been explored (111,112).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation§ POSTTRANSPLANTATION DIABETES MELLITUS
Hyperglycemia is very common during the early posttransplant period, with 90% of kidney allograft recipients exhibiting hyperglycemia in the first few weeks following transplant.
“Hyperglycemia is very common during the early posttransplant period, with 90% of kidney allograft recipients exhibiting hyperglycemia in the first few weeks following transplant (138,139,141,142).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [138] Sharif, 2014, Proceedings from an international consensus meeting on posttransplantation diabetes mellitus: recommendations and future directions, Am J Transplant source
- cites [139] Hecking, 2013, Novel views on new-onset diabetes after transplantation: development, prevention and treatment, Nephrol Dial Transplant source
- cites [141] Ramirez, 2014, The association between glycemic control and clinical outcomes after kidney transplantation, Endocr Pract source
- Premisecitation§ PANCREATIC DIABETES OR DIABETES IN THE CONTEXT OF DISEASE OF THE EXOCRINE PANCREAS
Acute (even a single bout) and chronic pancreatitis can lead to postpancreatitis diabetes mellitus.
“Acute (even a single bout) and chronic pancreatitis can lead to postpancreatitis diabetes mellitus (117).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [117] Hines, 2024, Management of chronic pancreatitis, BMJ source
The Introduction states that chronic pancreatitis can result in diabetes, and the section on exocrine and endocrine insufficiency calls this post-pancreatitis diabetes. Our copy does not say that acute pancreatitis, including a single bout, can lead to it. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation§ Neonatal Diabetes
About 80-85% of neonatal diabetes cases can be found to have an underlying monogenic cause.
“about 80-85% of cases can be found to have an underlying monogenic cause (36,(154)(155)(156)(157).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [36] Holt, 2021, The management of type 1 diabetes in adults. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD), Diabetes Care source
The Genetic Testing section says that more than 80% of people diagnosed with diabetes before 6 months of age have monogenic neonatal diabetes. This supports the claim’s approximate magnitude, but the source does not specify an 85% upper bound. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [154] De Franco, 2015, The effect of early, comprehensive genomic testing on clinical care in neonatal diabetes: an international cohort study, Lancet source
- cites [155] Sanyoura, 2019, GCK-MODY in the US Monogenic Diabetes Registry: description of 27 unpublished variants, Diabetes Res Clin Pract source
The Introduction discusses MODY and estimates that its subtypes account for about 2–5% of all diabetes cases; the Discussion reports the proportion of MODY cases involving GCK in this registry. Neither section gives a proportion of neonatal diabetes cases with a monogenic cause. Searches for neonatal diabetes and 80–85% found only a neonatal-diabetes study listed in the References, not the claimed estimate. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation§ Screening and Testing for Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes in Children and Adolescents
The epidemiologic studies that formed the basis for the recommendations to use A1C and plasma glucose criteria to diagnose prediabetes and diabetes included only adult populations.
“The epidemiologic studies that formed the basis for the recommendations to use A1C and plasma glucose criteria to diagnose prediabetes and diabetes included only adult populations (113).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [113] Cowie, 2010, Prevalence of diabetes and high risk for diabetes using A1C criteria in the U.S. population in 1988-2006, Diabetes Care source
The Research Design and Methods section says this paper analyzed NHANES participants aged 12 years and older, and Table 1 reports results for ages 12–19. The paper says an international expert committee recommended A1C criteria, but our copy does not establish the ages included in the epidemiologic studies underlying the A1C and plasma-glucose recommendations. This paper’s inclusion of adolescents does not, by itself, settle that claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation§ One-Step Strategy
Data are lacking on how the treatment of mother's hyperglycemia in pregnancy affects her offspring's risk for obesity, diabetes, and other metabolic disorders.
“Data are lacking on how the treatment of mother's hyperglycemia in pregnancy affects her offspring's risk for obesity, diabetes, and other metabolic disorders (201,202).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [201] Landon, 2015, Mild gestational diabetes mellitus and long-term child health, Diabetes Care source
- cites [202] Tam, 2017, In utero exposure to maternal hyperglycemia increases childhood cardiometabolic risk in offspring, Diabetes Care source
The Introduction (page unavailable) says follow-up analyses of two treatment trials found no reduction in childhood obesity or glucose intolerance, but neither trial was powered to assess long-term metabolic consequences. This supports a lack of adequate long-term evidence, not an unqualified statement that data on offspring outcomes are lacking. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation§ Two-Step Strategy
The use of A1C at 24-28 weeks of gestation as a screening test for GDM does not function as well as the GLT.
“The use of A1C at 24-28 weeks of gestation as a screening test for GDM does not function as well as the GLT (206).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [206] Khalafallah, 2016, Glycosylated haemoglobin for screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus, BMJ Open source
The Objectives of the study and Discussion (pages unavailable) support the 24–28-week timing and report that HbA1c’s low sensitivity limits its use for GDM screening. But the study compared HbA1c with a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), not a GLT, so it does not establish the claimed comparison with GLT. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation§ One-Step Strategy
Intervention trials focusing on individuals with lower levels of hyperglycemia than those identified using older GDM diagnostic criteria found modest benefits, including reduced rates of large-for-gestational-age births and preeclampsia.
“Those trials found modest benefits, including reduced rates of largefor-gestational-age births and preeclampsia (194,195).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation§ One-Step Strategy
80-90% of participants being treated for mild GDM in these two randomized controlled trials could be managed with lifestyle therapy alone.
“Of note, 80-90% of participants being treated for mild GDM in these two randomized controlled trials could be managed with lifestyle therapy alone.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [194] Landon, 2009, A multicenter, randomized trial of treatment for mild gestational diabetes, N Engl J Med source
The Results (Maternal Outcomes) report that 37 of 485 women in the treatment group required insulin, implying that about 92% were managed without it. That supports the lifestyle-only point for this trial, though the figure is slightly above 80–90%; the Discussion mentions the second trial but does not give its insulin-use rate. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [195] Crowther, 2005, Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes, N Engl J Med source
The secondary outcomes section reports that 20% of women in this trial’s intervention group received insulin, supporting the inference that 80% were managed without it. The interventions section describes dietary advice and glucose monitoring, but this paper reports one randomized trial and does not establish the 80–90% figure across two trials. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation§ One-Step Strategy
Associations of mother's fasting, 1-h, and 2-h values on the 75-g OGTT were continuous with a comprehensive panel of offspring metabolic outcomes.
“Associations of mother's fasting, 1-h, and 2-h values on the 75-g OGTT were continuous with a comprehensive panel of offspring metabolic outcomes (198,199).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [198] Lowe, 2019, Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome Follow-up Study (HAPO FUS): maternal gestational diabetes mellitus and childhood glucose metabolism, Diabetes Care source
The Results section ('Association of Maternal GDM Status With Childhood Glucose Levels'; page unavailable) reports associations between maternal GDM status and several offspring glucose outcomes, but not offspring fasting glucose. The Methods ('Outcomes and Predictors'; page unavailable) define the maternal predictor as GDM status based on fasting, 1-h, or 2-h OGTT thresholds. This paper does not establish continuous associations for each maternal OGTT value across a comprehensive panel of offspring metabolic outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [199] Scholtens, 2019, Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome Follow-up Study (HAPO FUS): maternal glycemia and childhood glucose metabolism, Diabetes Care source
The Results section, under “Associations Between Continuous Maternal Glycemia and Continuous Child Glucose Outcomes,” examines maternal fasting, 1-h, and 2-h OGTT values against a broad panel of child outcomes. But the associations were not present for every value–outcome pair: maternal fasting glucose was not associated with child 1-h or 2-h glucose, and it was not significantly associated with disposition index. The cited passages provide no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation§ Future Considerations
Pregnancies complicated by GDM per the IADPSG criteria, but not recognized as such, have outcomes comparable to pregnancies with diagnosed GDM by the more stringent two-step criteria.
“Pregnancies complicated by GDM per the IADPSG criteria, but not recognized as such, have outcomes comparable to pregnancies with diagnosed GDM by the more stringent two-step criteria (215,216).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [215] Ethridge, 2014, Perinatal outcomes associated with the diagnosis of gestational diabetes made by the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria, Obstet Gynecol source
The Discussion reports that untreated women meeting IADPSG but not Carpenter–Coustan criteria had similar neonatal outcomes to women diagnosed and treated under Carpenter–Coustan criteria, including birth-weight z-score, large-for-gestational-age status, macrosomia, and Ponderal Index. The claim is broader than that finding: the Discussion and Abstract conclusions also report higher absolute birth weight in the IADPSG group. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [216] Mayo, 2015, The impact of adoption of the international association of diabetes in pregnancy study group criteria for the screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes, Am J Obstet Gynecol source
- Premisecitation§ Future Considerations
Data that compare population-wide outcomes with one-step versus two-step approaches have been inconsistent to date.
“Data that compare population-wide outcomes with one-step versus two-step approaches have been inconsistent to date (196,(212)(213)(214).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [196] Hillier, 2021, A pragmatic, randomized clinical trial of gestational diabetes screening, N Engl J Med source
- cites [212] Wei, 2014, International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group criteria is suitable for gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosis: further evidence from China, Chin Med J (Engl) source
- cites [213] Feldman, 2016, Gestational diabetes screening: the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups compared with Carpenter-Coustan screening, Obstet Gynecol source
- Premisecitation§ 2.1a
Compared with FPG and A1C cut points, the 2-h PG value diagnoses more people with prediabetes and diabetes.
“Compared with FPG and A1C cut points, the 2-h PG value diagnoses more people with prediabetes and diabetes (4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] Meijnikman, 2017, Not performing an OGTT results in significant underdiagnosis of (pre)diabetes in a high risk adult Caucasian population, Int J Obes source
- Premisecitation§ 2.2a
Studies have found that African American individuals have slightly higher A1C levels than non-Hispanic White or Hispanic people.
“Studies have found that African American individuals have slightly higher A1C levels than non-Hispanic White or Hispanic people (22)(23)(24)(25).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites (22)(23)(24)(25)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 2.2a
The glucose-independent racial difference in A1C is small (0.3 percentage points).
“The glucoseindependent racial difference in A1C is small (0.3 percentage points) and may reflect genetic differences in hemoglobin or red cell turnover that vary by ancestry.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ 2.1a
There is presently insufficient evidence to support the use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) for screening or diagnosis of prediabetes or diabetes.
“There is presently insufficient evidence to support the use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) for screening or diagnosis of prediabetes or diabetes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given§ 2.2a
A1C has lower sensitivity at the designated cut point compared with 2-h PG.
“However, it should be noted that there is lower sensitivity of A1C at the designated cut point compared with that of 2-h PG as well as limited access in some parts of the world (Table 2.3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 2.2a
Clinically meaningful changes in A1C can be seen in less than 120 days.
“This means that clinically meaningful changes in A1C can be seen in <120 days.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: A1C reflects glucose bound to hemoglobin over the life span of the erythrocyte (120 days) and is thus a weighted average that is more heavily affected by recent blood glucose exposure.
- Premisecitation§ Medications
People with HIV are at higher risk for developing prediabetes and diabetes.
“People with HIV are at higher risk for developing prediabetes and diabetes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [106] Schambelan, 2002, Management of metabolic complications associated with antiretroviral therapy for HIV-1 infection: recommendations of an International AIDS Society–USA panel, J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr source
- Interpretationcitation§ TYPE 1 DIABETES
Fewer than half of individuals with checkpoint inhibitor-associated type 1 diabetes have autoantibodies that are seen in type 1 diabetes, supporting alternate pathobiology.
“Fewer than half of these individuals have autoantibodies that are seen in type 1 diabetes, supporting alternate pathobiology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ Screening and Testing for Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes in Asymptomatic Adults
Simple tests to detect preclinical disease are readily available.
“Simple tests to detect preclinical disease are readily available (98).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [98] Bardenheier, 2021, Progression to diabetes by baseline glycemic status among middle-aged and older adults in the United States, 2006-2014, Diabetes Res Clin Pract source
- Interpretationcitation§ Diagnosis of Prediabetes
An A1C range of 5.7-6.4% identifies a group of individuals at high risk for diabetes and cardiovascular outcomes.
“An A1C range of 5.7-6.4% (39-47 mmol/mol) identifies a group of individuals at high risk for diabetes and cardiovascular outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Medications
People taking second-generation antipsychotic medications require greater monitoring because of an increase in risk of type 2 diabetes associated with this medication.
“For example, people taking secondgeneration antipsychotic medications require greater monitoring because of an increase in risk of type 2 diabetes associated with this medication (105).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [105] American Diabetes Association, American Psychiatric Association, American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, North American Association for the Study of Obesity, 2004, Consensus development conference on antipsychotic drugs and obesity and diabetes, Diabetes Care source
- Premisenone given§ Neonatal Diabetes
Insulin gene (INS) mutations are the second most common cause of permanent neonatal diabetes.
“Insulin gene (INS) mutations are the second most common cause of permanent neonatal diabetes, with insulin therapy being the preferred treatment strategy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ Testing Interval
The appropriate interval between screening tests is not known.
“The appropriate interval between screening tests is not known (109).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [109] Johnson, 2005, The efficacy and cost of alternative strategies for systematic screening for type 2 diabetes in the U.S. population 45-74 years of age, Diabetes Care source
- Premisenone given§ Neonatal Diabetes
Permanent neonatal diabetes is most commonly due to autosomal dominant mutations in the genes encoding the Kir6.2 subunit (KCNJ11) and SUR1 subunit (ABCC8) of the beta-cell KATP channel.
“Permanent neonatal diabetes is most commonly due to autosomal dominant mutations in the genes encoding the Kir6.2 subunit (KCNJ11) and SUR1 subunit (ABCC8) of the b-cell K ATP channel.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given§ One-Step Strategy
The IADPSG diagnostic criteria are the only GDM diagnostic criteria based on pregnancy outcomes rather than end points such as prediction of subsequent maternal diabetes.
“The ADA recommends the IADPSG diagnostic criteria to optimize gestational outcomes, because these criteria are the only ones based on pregnancy outcomes rather than end points such as prediction of subsequent maternal diabetes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 2.25
The benefits of treatment of early abnormal glucose metabolism remain uncertain.
“Therefore, the benefits of treatment of early abnormal glucose metabolism remain uncertain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Most randomized controlled trials of treatment of early abnormal glucose metabolism have been underpowered for outcomes.
- Premisecitation§ Diagnosis
The HAPO study demonstrated that risk of adverse maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes continuously increased as a function of maternal glycemia at 24-28 weeks of gestation, even within ranges previously considered normal for pregnancy.
“The Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) study (189), a large-scale multinational cohort study completed by more than 23,000 pregnant individuals, demonstrated that risk of adverse maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes continuously increased as a function of maternal glycemia at 24-28 weeks of gestation, even within ranges previously considered normal for pregnancy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [189] Metzger, 2008, Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes, N Engl J Med source
- Interpretationown data§ 2.25
The improvement in composite adverse neonatal outcome was driven primarily by differences in rates of neonatal respiratory distress between groups that included neonates requiring at least 4 h of supplemental oxygen who may not have required a higher level of respiratory care.
“although this was driven primarily by differences in rates of neonatal respiratory distress between groups that included neonates requiring $4 h of supplemental oxygen who may not have required a higher level of respiratory care.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ One-Step Strategy
HAPO Follow-up Study data demonstrate that neonatal adiposity and fetal hyperinsulinemia (cord C-peptide), both higher across the continuum of maternal hyperglycemia, are mediators of childhood body fat.
“HAPO Follow-up Study (HAPO FUS) data demonstrate that neonatal adiposity and fetal hyperinsulinemia (cord C-peptide), both higher across the continuum of maternal hyperglycemia, are mediators of childhood body fat (200).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [200] Josefson, 2021, Newborn adiposity and cord blood C-peptide as mediators of the maternal metabolic environment and childhood adiposity, Diabetes Care source
- Premisecitation§ Diagnosis
For most complications, there was no threshold for risk.
“For most complications, there was no threshold for risk.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [189] Metzger, 2008, Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes, N Engl J Med source
- May combine two claims. 56
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 9
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ TYPE 1 DIABETESThe rate of b-cell destruction is quite variable, being rapid in some individuals (particularly but not exclusively in infants and children) and slow in others (mainly but not exclusively adults).
“The rate of b-cell destruction is quite variable, being rapid in some individuals (particularly but not exclusively in infants and children) and slow in others (mainly but not exclusively adults) (44,58).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [44] Bogun, 2020, C-peptide levels in subjects followed longitudinally before and after type 1 diabetes diagnosis in TrialNet, Diabetes Care source
The Introduction (page unavailable) reports that adults have a slower rate of C-peptide decline than children, and the Results find that age influences that rate. This supports the age-related pattern, but the paper measures C-peptide as an indicator of β-cell function, not the rate of β-cell destruction, and its participants were aged 3.9 years or older, so it does not establish the claim about infants. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [58] Greenbaum, 2012, Fall in C-peptide during first 2 years from diagnosis: evidence of at least two distinct phases from composite type 1 diabetes TrialNet data, Diabetes source
The Results report variation in individual C-peptide decline, and the Discussion says decline was faster at ages 7–21 than above age 21. But the paper measures β-cell function after diagnosis, not destruction directly, and explicitly says its data cannot support conclusions about children younger than 7, including infants (Discussion; page unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ TYPE 1 DIABETESAdults may retain sufficient b-cell function to prevent DKA for many years; such individuals may have remission characterized by decreased insulin needs for months or years, eventually become dependent on insulin for survival, and are at risk for DKA.
“Adults may retain sufficient b-cell function to prevent DKA for many years; such individuals may have remission characterized by decreased insulin needs for months or years, eventually become dependent on insulin for survival, and are at risk for DKA (33-35, 59,60).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 5 sources checked- cites [33] Humphreys, 2019, Individual and diabetes presentation characteristics associated with partial remission status in children and adults evaluated up to 12months following diagnosis of type 1 diabetes: an ADDRESS-2 (After Diagnosis Diabetes Research Support System-2) study analysis, Diabetes Res Clin Pract source
- cites [34] Thomas, 2019, Type 1 diabetes defined by severe insulin deficiency occurs after 30 years of age and is commonly treated as type 2 diabetes, Diabetologia source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [35] Hope, 2016, Practical Classification Guidelines for Diabetes in patients treated with insulin: a cross-sectional study of the accuracy of diabetes diagnosis, Br J Gen Pract source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [59] Mishra, 2018, A global perspective of latent autoimmune diabetes in adults, Trends Endocrinol Metab source
- cites [60] Buzzetti, 2017, Adult-onset autoimmune diabetes: current knowledge and implications for management, Nat Rev Endocrinol source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2.2aA1C may not be a suitable diagnostic test in people with anemia, people treated with erythropoietin, or people undergoing hemodialysis or HIV treatment.
“A1C may not be a suitable diagnostic test in people with anemia, people treated with erythropoietin, or people undergoing hemodialysis or HIV treatment (1,19,20).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [1] Sacks, 2023, Guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus, Diabetes Care source
The 'Other Patient-Related Factors and Interfering Factors' section (page unavailable) says altered red-blood-cell turnover can make HbA1c results spurious and require glucose testing for diagnosis; it specifically discusses hemolytic and iron-deficiency anemia. The passages found do not address erythropoietin treatment, hemodialysis, or HIV treatment as reasons A1C may be unsuitable for diagnosis. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [19] Eckhardt, 2012, Glycated hemoglobin A(1c) as screening for diabetes mellitus in HIV-infected individuals, AIDS Patient Care STDS source
The Introduction (page not provided) notes that HbA1c screening may be unsuitable with abnormal red-cell turnover, including iron-deficiency anemia. The Discussion (page not provided) finds HbA1c insensitive for diagnosing diabetes in HIV-infected patients, though it also calls HbA1c a practical screening option when used with fasting blood glucose. Our copy does not address erythropoietin treatment or hemodialysis, and it does not establish the same concern for every form of anemia. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [20] Kim, 2009, A1C underestimates glycemia in HIV infection, Diabetes Care source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ TYPE 1 DIABETESAt stage 1 of type 1 diabetes, the 5-year risk of developing symptomatic type 1 diabetes is 44% overall but varies considerably based on number, titer, and specificity of autoantibodies as well as age of seroconversion and genetic risk.
“At stage 1, the 5-year risk of developing symptomatic type 1 diabetes is 44% overall but varies considerably based on number, titer, and specificity of autoantibodies as well as age of seroconversion and genetic risk (45).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [45] Insel, 2015, Staging presymptomatic type 1 diabetes: a scientific statement of JDRF, the Endocrine Society, and the American Diabetes Association, Diabetes Care source
The Overview of Staging, Stage 1 section gives an approximately 44% five-year risk for children screened for genetic risk at birth who reach stage 1, not an overall estimate for everyone at stage 1. The Stage 1 section supports variation by autoantibody number, titer and type, age at seroconversion, and HLA genotype. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ TYPE 1 DIABETESAt stage 2 of type 1 diabetes, there is 60% risk by 2 years and 75% risk within 5 years of developing a clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes.
“At stage 2 of the disease, there is 60% risk by 2 years and 75% risk within 5 years of developing a clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes (55,56).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [55] Sosenko, 2009, Incident dysglycemia and progression to type 1 diabetes among participants in the Diabetes Prevention Trial-Type 1, Diabetes Care source
The Results report that dysglycemia predicted progression to clinical type 1 diabetes, and that 75% of a small subgroup of children under 13 with persistent dysglycemia developed it during a maximum follow-up of 4.5 years. They do not report a 60% risk by two years or a 75% five-year risk for everyone at stage 2; the reported five-year estimate for children under 13 with dysglycemia was 94%. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [56] Krischer, 2013, The use of intermediate endpoints in the design of type 1 diabetes prevention trials, Diabetologia source
The Results report a 74% risk of type 1 diabetes four years after confirmed dysglycaemia, close to the claimed 75% but at a different time point. They do not report a 60% risk of clinical diagnosis at two years; the two-year figure for this group is a 41% risk of progressing from normal glucose tolerance to dysglycaemia. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Confirming the DiagnosisThe features most useful in determination of type 1 diabetes include younger age at diagnosis (<35 years) with lower BMI (<25 kg/m2), unintentional weight loss, ketoacidosis, and plasma glucose >360 mg/dL (>20 mmol/L) at presentation.
“The features most useful in determination of type 1 diabetes include younger age at diagnosis (<35 years) with lower BMI (<25 kg/m 2 ), unintentional weight loss, ketoacidosis, and plasma glucose >360 mg/dL (>20 mmol/L) at presentation (36) (Fig.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] Holt, 2021, The management of type 1 diabetes in adults. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD), Diabetes Care source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Type 2 diabetesMisdiagnosis is common and can occur in 40% of adults with new type 1 diabetes (e.g., adults with type 1 diabetes misdiagnosed as having type 2 diabetes).
“and that misdiagnosis is common and can occur in 40% of adults with new type 1 diabetes (e.g., adults with type 1 diabetes misdiagnosed as having type 2 diabetes).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] Holt, 2021, The management of type 1 diabetes in adults. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD), Diabetes Care source
The “Differentiating Type 1 Diabetes From Type 2 Diabetes” section says misclassification is common and that over 40% of people developing type 1 diabetes after age 30 are initially treated as having type 2 diabetes. The claim omits the age-after-30 qualifier, presenting the figure as applying to adults with new type 1 diabetes generally. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2.1aFPG, 2-h PG, and A1C reflect different aspects of glucose metabolism, and diagnostic cut points for the different tests will identify groups with incomplete concordance.
“FPG, 2-h PG, and A1C reflect different aspects of glucose metabolism, and diagnostic cut points for the different tests will identify groups with incomplete concordance (3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] International Expert Committee, 2009, International Expert Committee report on the role of the A1C assay in the diagnosis of diabetes, Diabetes Care source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2.1).Occasionally, people with type 2 diabetes may present with DKA, particularly members of certain racial, ethnic, and ancestral groups (e.g., African American and Hispanic/Latino adults), who may present with ketosis-prone type 2 diabetes.
“Occasionally, people with type 2 diabetes may present with DKA (37), particularly members of certain racial, ethnic, and ancestral groups (e.g., African American and Hispanic/Latino adults), who may present with ketosisprone type 2 diabetes (30).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [37] Zhong, 2018, Trends in hospital admission for diabetic ketoacidosis in adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes in England, 1998-2013: a retrospective cohort study, Diabetes Care source
- cites [30] Umpierrez, 2024, Hyperglycemic crises in adults with diabetes: a consensus report, Diabetes Care source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Type 2 diabetesDiagnostic accuracy may be improved by using higher-specificity tests, using confirmatory testing for other autoantibodies, and restricting testing to those with clinical features suggestive of autoimmune diabetes.
“Diagnostic accuracy may be improved by using higher-specificity tests, using confirmatory testing for other autoantibodies, and restricting testing to those with clinical features suggestive of autoimmune diabetes (48).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [48] Jones, 2021, Latent autoimmune diabetes of adults (LADA) is likely to represent a mixed population of autoimmune (type 1) and nonautoimmune (type 2) diabetes, Diabetes Care source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Screening for Type 1 Diabetes RiskOf 585 children who developed more than two autoantibodies, nearly 70% developed type 1 diabetes within 10 years and 84% within 15 years.
“Of the 585 children who developed more than two autoantibodies, nearly 70% developed type 1 diabetes within 10 years and 84% within 15 years (40).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [40] Ziegler, 2013, Seroconversion to multiple islet autoantibodies and risk of progression to diabetes in children, JAMA source
The Results section (“Children With Multiple Islet Autoantibodies”; page not provided) reports 585 children and estimated diabetes progression of 69.7% at 10 years and 84.2% at 15 years after seroconversion. But “multiple” includes children with two autoantibodies, whereas the claim says more than two. The reported percentages are follow-up risk estimates, not counts of children who developed diabetes. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ TYPE 1 DIABETESThis immune-related adverse event occurs in just under 1% of checkpoint inhibitor-treated individuals but most commonly occurs with agents that block the programmed cell death protein 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 pathway alone or in combination with other checkpoint inhibitors.
“This immune-related adverse event occurs in just under 1% of checkpoint inhibitortreated individuals but most commonly occurs with agents that block the programmed cell death protein 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 pathway alone or in combination with other checkpoint inhibitors (66).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [66] Stamatouli, 2018, Collateral damage: insulin-dependent diabetes induced with checkpoint inhibitors, Diabetes source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Screening for Type 1 Diabetes RiskTesting coupled with education about diabetes symptoms and close follow-up has been shown to enable earlier diagnosis and to prevent DKA.
“Such testing, coupled with education about diabetes symptoms and close follow-up, has been shown to enable earlier diagnosis and to prevent DKA (77,78).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [77] Barker, 2004, Clinical characteristics of children diagnosed with type 1 diabetes through intensive screening and follow-up, Diabetes Care source
- cites [78] Elding Larsson, 2014, Children followed in the TEDDY study are diagnosed with type 1 diabetes at an early stage of disease, Pediatr Diabetes source
The Discussion says that monitoring with screening and repeated education about symptoms may improve outcomes, and that TEDDY children had low DKA rates compared with the general population. It also links close follow-up to early diagnosis. But the Results report DKA in 8 of 100 children, so the paper supports a lower DKA rate, not a categorical claim that follow-up prevents DKA. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Screening for Type 1 Diabetes RiskMany genetic risk studies have been performed in populations of European ancestry and discriminatory ability may differ in those of different ancestry.
“As many genetic risk studies have been performed in populations of European ancestry and discriminatory ability may differ in those of different ancestry, more large case-control cohorts from non-European populations are still needed (82).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [82] Luckett, 2023, Utility of genetic risk scores in type 1 diabetes, Diabetologia source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ Screening and Testing for Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes in Children and AdolescentsADA clinical guidance concluded that A1C, FPG, or 2-h PG also could be used to test for prediabetes or type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents.
“However, ADA clinical guidance concluded that A1C, FPG, or 2-h PG also could be used to test for prediabetes or type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents (114).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [114] Arslanian, 2018, Evaluation and management of youth-onset type 2 diabetes: a position statement by the American Diabetes Association, Diabetes Care source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2.25The ongoing epidemic of obesity and diabetes has led to more type 2 diabetes in people of reproductive age, with an increase in the number of pregnant individuals with undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in early pregnancy.
“The ongoing epidemic of obesity and diabetes has led to more type 2 diabetes in people of reproductive age, with an increase in the number of pregnant individuals with undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in early pregnancy (164-166).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [164] Feig, 2014, Trends in incidence of diabetes in pregnancy and serious perinatal outcomes: a large, population-based study in Ontario, Canada, 1996-2010, Diabetes Care source
- cites [165] Peng, 2017, Trends and racial and ethnic disparities in the prevalence of pregestational type 1 and type 2 diabetes in Northern California: 1996-2014, Am J Obstet Gynecol source
The Comments report increasing pregestational type 2 diabetes and suggest that rising obesity among women of reproductive age likely contributed. But Materials and Methods says the study identified diabetes clinically recognized before pregnancy; it does not establish an increase in undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in early pregnancy. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [166] Jovanovič, 2015, Trends in the incidence of diabetes, its clinical sequelae, and associated costs in pregnancy, Diabetes Metab Res Rev source
The Introduction and Results report increasing type 2 diabetes among women of child-bearing age and pregnant women. The Introduction gives an estimate of undiagnosed diabetes only for US adults generally; it does not establish an increase among pregnant people in early pregnancy. The paper also does not attribute the increase to obesity. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ POSTTRANSPLANTATION DIABETES MELLITUSUse of immunosuppressive therapies is a major contributor to the development of PTDM, but the risks of transplant rejection outweigh the risks of PTDM.
“Although the use of immunosuppressive therapies is a major contributor to the development of PTDM, the risks of transplant rejection outweigh the risks of PTDM, and the role of the diabetes health care professional is to treat hyperglycemia appropriately regardless of the type of immunosuppression (138).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [138] Sharif, 2014, Proceedings from an international consensus meeting on posttransplantation diabetes mellitus: recommendations and future directions, Am J Transplant source
Recommendation 5 (page not provided) identifies immunosuppression as the major modifiable risk factor for PTDM and advises choosing regimens for patient and graft survival rather than PTDM risk alone. It calls for balancing PTDM against rejection risk, however, rather than saying rejection risk always outweighs PTDM risk. Recommendation 6 recommends treating posttransplant hyperglycemia, but does not specifically assign that role to diabetes health care professionals regardless of immunosuppression type. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Cystic Fibrosis-Related DiabetesCystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CFRD) is a common comorbidity in people with cystic fibrosis, occurring in about 20% of adolescents and 40-50% of adults.
“Cystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CFRD) is a common comorbidity in people with cystic fibrosis, occurring in about 20% of adolescents and 40-50% of adults (127).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [127] Ode, 2022, ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: management of cystic fibrosis-related diabetes in children and adolescents, Pediatr Diabetes source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Cystic Fibrosis-Related DiabetesA1C is not recommended for screening for CFRD due to low sensitivity; however, a value of >=6.5% is consistent with a diagnosis of CFRD and reduces patient screening burden.
“A1C is not recommended for screening due to low sensitivity; however, a value of $6.5% ($48 mmol/mol) is consistent with a diagnosis of CFRD and reduces patient screening burden (129-131).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [129] Gilmour, 2019, Response to the letter to the editor from Dr. Boudreau et al, “Validation of a stepwise approach using glycated hemoglobin levels to reduce the number of required oral glucose tolerance tests to screen for cystic fibrosis-related diabetes in adults, Can J Diabetes source
- cites [130] Gilmour, 2019, Cystic fibrosis-related diabetes screening in adults: a gap analysis and evaluation of accuracy of glycated hemoglobin levels, Can J Diabetes source
- cites [131] Darukhanavala, 2021, Use of hemoglobin A1c to identify dysglycemia in cystic fibrosis, PLoS One source
The Discussion says HbA1c has low sensitivity for diagnosing CFRD and that guidelines do not recommend it for screening. Our copy does not state that an HbA1c value of ≥6.5% diagnoses CFRD; its Introduction presents reduced screening burden only as a potential benefit if HbA1c proved suitable, while its Conclusion does not support its use for screening pre-CFRD dysglycemia. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the YoungMODY is inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern with abnormalities in at least 14 genes on different chromosomes identified to date.
“It is inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern with abnormalities in at least 14 genes on different chromosomes identified to date (152).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [152] Greeley, 2022, ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: the diagnosis and management of monogenic diabetes in children and adolescents, Pediatr Diabetes source
The section on autosomal dominant familial mild hyperglycemia or diabetes (MODY; page unavailable) says known MODY subtypes involve dominantly acting mutations and that at least 14 genes have been reported to cause a MODY-like phenotype. It does not establish that those genes are all on different chromosomes, and it qualifies the count as genes reported to cause a MODY-like phenotype. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Cystic Fibrosis-Related DiabetesThe Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry evaluated 3,553 people with cystic fibrosis and identified 445 (13%) with CFRD.
“The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry (132) evaluated 3,553 people with cystic fibrosis and identified 445 (13%) with CFRD.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [132] Franck Thompson, 2020, The association of pediatric cystic fibrosis-related diabetes screening on clinical outcomes by center: a CF patient registry study, J Cyst Fibros source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ POSTTRANSPLANTATION DIABETES MELLITUSPosttransplantation hyperglycemia is an important risk factor for subsequent PTDM; a formal diagnosis of PTDM is optimally made once the individual is stable on maintenance immunosuppression (usually at least 45 days) and in the absence of acute infection.
“Whereas posttransplantation hyperglycemia is an important risk factor for subsequent PTDM, a formal diagnosis of PTDM is optimally made once the individual is stable on maintenance immunosuppression (usually at least 45 days) and in the absence of acute infection (138,(142)(143)(144)147).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [138] Sharif, 2014, Proceedings from an international consensus meeting on posttransplantation diabetes mellitus: recommendations and future directions, Am J Transplant source
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [142] Thomas, 2000, Early peri-operative hyperglycaemia and renal allograft rejection in patients without diabetes, BMC Nephrol source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [143] Chakkera, 2009, Hyperglycemia during the immediate period after kidney transplantation, Clin J Am Soc Nephrol source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ MedicationsThe A1C test may underestimate glycemia in people with HIV, so plasma glucose criteria are preferred to diagnose prediabetes and diabetes.
“As the A1C test may underestimate glycemia in people with HIV, plasma glucose criteria are preferred to diagnose prediabetes and diabetes (20).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Kim, 2009, A1C underestimates glycemia in HIV infection, Diabetes Care source
The Abstract Results and Conclusions report that A1C underestimated glycemia in the HIV-infected patients studied. The paper does not recommend plasma glucose criteria over A1C for diagnosing prediabetes or diabetes; its Conclusions instead suggest that fructosamine may be more appropriate for assessing glycemia in this setting. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the YoungCorrect diagnosis of monogenic forms of diabetes is critical because people who have them may be incorrectly diagnosed with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, leading to suboptimal, even potentially harmful, treatment plans and delays in diagnosing other family members.
“Correct diagnosis of monogenic forms of diabetes is critical because people who have them may be incorrectly diagnosed with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, leading to suboptimal, even potentially harmful, treatment plans and delays in diagnosing other family members (152).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [152] Greeley, 2022, ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: the diagnosis and management of monogenic diabetes in children and adolescents, Pediatr Diabetes source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2.25Preconception care of people with known preexisting diabetes results in lower A1C and reduced risk of birth defects, preterm delivery, perinatal mortality, small-for-gestational-age birth weight, and neonatal intensive care unit admission.
“The preconception care of people with known preexisting diabetes results in lower A1C and reduced risk of birth defects, preterm delivery, perinatal mortality, small-for-gestational-age birth weight, and neonatal intensive care unit admission (173).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [173] Wahabi, 2020, Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of pre-pregnancy care for women with diabetes for improving maternal and perinatal outcomes, PLoS One source
The Conclusion (page not provided) reports lower HbA1c and reduced congenital malformations, perinatal mortality, and small-for-gestational-age births in women with pregestational diabetes. It says preconception care *may* reduce preterm delivery and NICU admission; the claim presents those two effects as unqualified results. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Community ScreeningCommunity screening may be poorly targeted; it may fail to reach the groups most at risk and inappropriately test those at very low risk or even those who have already been diagnosed.
“Community screening may also be poorly targeted; i.e., it may fail to reach the groups most at risk and inappropriately test those at very low risk or even those who have already been diagnosed (110).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [110] Tabaei, 2003, Community-based screening for diabetes in Michigan, Diabetes Care source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the YoungGenetic screening (i.e., next-generation sequencing) is increasingly available and cost-effective.
“Genetic screening (i.e., next-generation sequencing) is increasingly available and cost-effective (152).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [152] Greeley, 2022, ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: the diagnosis and management of monogenic diabetes in children and adolescents, Pediatr Diabetes source
In ‘Selecting candidates for molecular testing,’ the guidelines say genetic testing is available in many countries and that NGS has a lower cost per gene. They also say NGS panels remain expensive and that cost-effectiveness depends on the condition and selection of patients; the claim presents cost-effectiveness without those qualifications. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2.25Early abnormal glucose metabolism, defined as a fasting glucose threshold of 110 mg/dL or an A1C of 5.9%, may identify individuals who are at higher risk of adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes (preeclampsia, macrosomia, shoulder dystocia, and perinatal death), are at high risk of a later GDM diagnosis, and are more likely to need insulin treatment.
“Early abnormal glucose metabolism, defined as a fasting glucose threshold of 110 mg/dL (6.1 mmol/L) or an A1C of 5.9% (41 mmol/mol), may identify individuals who are at higher risk of adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes (preeclampsia, macrosomia, shoulder dystocia, and perinatal death), are at high risk of a later GDM diagnosis, and are more likely to need insulin treatment (174-176).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [174] Zhu, 2013, Evaluation of the value of fasting plasma glucose in the first prenatal visit to diagnose gestational diabetes mellitus in China, Diabetes Care source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [175] Mañé, 2019, Association of first-trimester HbA1c levels with adverse pregnancy outcomes in different ethnic groups, Diabetes Res Clin Pract source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [176] Kattini, 2020, Early gestational diabetes mellitus screening with glycated hemoglobin: a systematic review, J Obstet Gynaecol Can source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ One-Step StrategyThe OGTT glucose cutoffs in these two trials overlapped the thresholds recommended by the IADPSG, and in one trial the 2-h PG threshold (140 mg/dL [7.8 mmol/L]) was lower than the cutoff recommended by the IADPSG (153 mg/dL [8.5 mmol/L]).
“The OGTT glucose cutoffs in these two trials overlapped the thresholds recommended by the IADPSG, and in one trial (195), the 2-h PG threshold (140 mg/dL [7.8 mmol/L]) was lower than the cutoff recommended by the IADPSG (153 mg/dL [8.5 mmol/L]).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [195] Crowther, 2005, Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes, N Engl J Med source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Future ConsiderationsA systematic review of economic evaluations of GDM screening found that the one-step method identified more cases of GDM and was more likely to be cost-effective than the two-step method.
“A systematic review of economic evaluations of GDM screening found that the one-step method identified more cases of GDM and was more likely to be cost-effective than the two-step method (211).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [211] Mo, 2021, Economic evaluations of gestational diabetes mellitus screening: a systematic review, J Epidemiol source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2.25The GDM diagnostic criteria for the 75-g OGTT from the IADPSG and the GDM screening and diagnostic criteria with the two-step approach were not derived from data in the first half of pregnancy.
“The GDM diagnostic criteria for the 75-g OGTT from the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) and the GDM screening and diagnostic criteria with the two-step approach were not derived from data in the first half of pregnancy”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [179] McIntyre, 2016, Issues with the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in early pregnancy, Diabetes Care source
In the main text (pp. 53–54), the paper contrasts standard GDM testing at 24–32 weeks with early pregnancy and says evidence is insufficient to recommend early-pregnancy OGTT cutoffs. This supports the point about applying IADPSG criteria in the first half of pregnancy, but the paper does not discuss the derivation of screening or diagnostic criteria for the two-step approach. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ One-Step StrategyPost hoc GDM in individuals diagnosed with the one-step method in the HAPO cohort was associated with higher prevalence of IGT; higher 30-min, 1-h, and 2-h glucose levels during the OGTT; and reduced insulin sensitivity and oral disposition index in their offspring at 10-14 years of age compared with offspring of mothers without GDM.
“Post hoc GDM in individuals diagnosed with this method in the HAPO cohort was associated with higher prevalence of IGT; higher 30-min, 1-h, and 2-h glucose levels during the OGTT; and reduced insulin sensitivity and oral disposition index in their offspring at 10-14 years of age compared with offspring of mothers without GDM.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [198] Lowe, 2019, Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome Follow-up Study (HAPO FUS): maternal gestational diabetes mellitus and childhood glucose metabolism, Diabetes Care source
- cites [199] Scholtens, 2019, Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome Follow-up Study (HAPO FUS): maternal glycemia and childhood glucose metabolism, Diabetes Care source
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ One-Step StrategyThe one-step strategy was anticipated to significantly increase the incidence of GDM (from 5-6% to 15-20%), primarily because only one abnormal value, not two, became sufficient to make the diagnosis.
“This one-step strategy was anticipated to significantly increase the incidence of GDM (from 5-6% to 15-20%), primarily because only one abnormal value, not two, became sufficient to make the diagnosis (191).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [191] Sacks, 2012, Frequency of gestational diabetes mellitus at collaborating centers based on IADPSG consensus panel-recommended criteria: the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) study, Diabetes Care source
The HAPO Study summary (p. 1) says the IADPSG criteria require one or more glucose values at or above threshold and reports a GDM frequency of 17.8%, within the claimed 15–20% range. It does not give a previous rate of 5–6%, describe the increase as anticipated, or establish that the change from two abnormal values to one was its primary cause. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2.25GDM is often indicative of underlying beta-cell dysfunction, which confers marked increased risk for later development of glucose intolerance and diabetes in the mother after delivery.
“GDM is often indicative of underlying b-cell dysfunction (182), which confers marked increased risk for later development of glucose intolerance and diabetes in the mother after delivery (183-185).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 4 sources checked- cites [182] Buchanan, 2007, What is gestational diabetes?, Diabetes Care source
- cites [183] Noctor, 2016, Abnormal glucose tolerance post-gestational diabetes mellitus as defined by the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria, Eur J Endocrinol source
- cites [184] Kim, 2002, Gestational diabetes and the incidence of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review, Diabetes Care source
- cites [185] Liu, 2023, Risk factors associated with early postpartum glucose intolerance in women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Endocrine source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Two-Step StrategyTreatment of higher-threshold maternal hyperglycemia, as identified by the two-step approach, reduces rates of neonatal macrosomia, large-for-gestational-age births, and shoulder dystocia without increasing small-for-gestational-age births.
“Treatment of higherthreshold maternal hyperglycemia, as identified by the two-step approach, reduces rates of neonatal macrosomia, large-forgestational-age births (207), and shoulder dystocia without increasing small-forgestational-age births.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [207] Farrar, 2017, Treatments for gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis, BMJ Open source
The Results (Packages of care and dietary modification trials; page unavailable) report reduced macrosomia, large-for-gestational-age births, and shoulder dystocia with treatment compared with routine care. The Discussion says the largest trials used criteria associated with more severe hyperglycaemia, but the review does not limit its pooled finding to women identified by a two-step approach. Its reported outcomes do not establish that treatment leaves small-for-gestational-age births unchanged. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Premisereasoning§ 2.2aA1C is an indirect measure of glucose exposure, and factors that affect hemoglobin concentrations or erythrocyte turnover can affect A1C.
“A1C is an indirect measure of glucose exposure, and factors that affect hemoglobin concentrations or erythrocyte turnover can affect A1C (e.g., thalassemia or folate deficiency) (Table 2.3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ TYPE 1 DIABETESChildren and adolescents often present with DKA as the first manifestation of the disease, and rates in the U.S. have increased over the past 20 years.
“Children and adolescents often present with DKA as the first manifestation of the disease, and rates in the U.S. have increased over the past 20 years (30)(31)(32).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites (30)(31)(32)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Type 2 diabetesIn at-risk cohorts followed from birth or a very young age, seroconversion rarely occurs before 6 months of age and there is a peak in seroconversion between 9 and 24 months of age.
“In at-risk cohorts followed from birth or a very young age, seroconversion rarely occurs before 6 months of age and there is a peak in seroconversion between 9 and 24 months of age (41)(42)(43).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites (41)(42)(43)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Confirming the DiagnosisChildren with type 1 diabetes often present with the hallmark symptoms of polyuria/polydipsia, and approximately half present with DKA.
“Children with type 1 diabetes often present with the hallmark symptoms of polyuria/polydipsia, and approximately half present with DKA (30)(31)(32).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites (30)(31)(32)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Confirming the DiagnosisThe onset of type 1 diabetes may be more variable in adults; they may not present with the classic symptoms seen in children and may progress to insulin replacement more slowly.
“The onset of type 1 diabetes may be more variable in adults; they may not present with the classic symptoms seen in children and may progress to insulin replacement more slowly (33)(34)(35).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites (33)(34)(35)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Screening and Testing for Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes in Asymptomatic AdultsPrediabetes and type 2 diabetes meet criteria for conditions in which early detection via screening is appropriate.
“Prediabetes and type 2 diabetes meet criteria for conditions in which early detection via screening is appropriate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Prediabetes is a significant risk factor for progression to diabetes as well as cardiovascular disease and several other cardiometabolic outcomes.
- Rests on an assumption: Prediabetes is associated with obesity (especially abdominal or visceral obesity), dyslipidemia with high triglycerides and/or low HDL cholesterol, and hypertension.
- Rests on an assumption: Type 2 diabetes occurs more frequently in individuals with prediabetes, prior gestational diabetes mellitus, or polycystic ovary syndrome.
- Rests on an assumption: Type 2 diabetes is often associated with a strong genetic predisposition or family history in first-degree relatives (more so than type 1 diabetes).
- Rests on an assumption: Both prediabetes and type 2 diabetes are common and impose significant clinical and public health burdens.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ TYPE 1 DIABETESFulminant onset of type 1 diabetes can occur, with DKA and low or undetectable levels of C-peptide as a marker of endogenous b-cell function.
“Fulminant onset of type 1 diabetes can occur, with DKA and low or undetectable levels of C-peptide as a marker of endogenous b-cell function (63)(64)(65).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites (63)(64)(65)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Screening for Type 1 Diabetes RiskThe findings in all three groups were the same, suggesting that the same sequence of events led to clinical disease in both sporadic and familial cases of type 1 diabetes.
“Remarkably, the findings in all three groups were the same, suggesting that the same sequence of events led to clinical disease in both “sporadic” and familial cases of type 1”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Screening for Type 1 Diabetes RiskPeople with type 1 diabetes often present with acute symptoms of diabetes and markedly elevated blood glucose levels, and 25-50% are diagnosed with life-threatening DKA.
“People with type 1 diabetes often present with acute symptoms of diabetes and markedly elevated blood glucose levels, and 25-50% are diagnosed with life-threatening DKA (30)(31)(32).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites (30)(31)(32)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Screening for Type 1 Diabetes RiskThe incidence and prevalence of type 1 diabetes are increasing.
“The incidence and prevalence of type 1 diabetes are increasing (70).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [70] Gregory, 2022, Global incidence, prevalence, and mortality of type 1 diabetes in 2021 with projection to 2040: a modelling study, Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Type 2 DiabetesThe risk of developing type 2 diabetes increases with age, obesity, and lack of physical activity.
“The risk of developing type 2 diabetes increases with age, obesity, and lack of physical activity (95,96).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [95] U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Statistics Report. Estimates of Diabetes and Its Burden in the United States. Accessed 11 September 2024. Available from https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/php/data-research/index.html
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [96] International Diabetes Federation . IDF Diabetes Atlas, 10th edition. Brussels, Belgium, International Diabetes Federation,2021. Accessed 5 August 2024. Available from https://www.diabetesatlas.org/atlas/tenth-edition/
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ TYPE 1 DIABETESDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, numbers of cases of hyperglycemia, DKA, and new diabetes increased, suggesting that SARS-CoV-2 is a trigger for or can unmask type 1 diabetes.
“During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, numbers of cases of hyperglycemia, DKA, and new diabetes increased, suggesting that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a trigger for or can unmask type 1 diabetes (68).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [68] Wang, 2023, COVID-19 as a trigger for type 1 diabetes, J Clin Endocrinol Metab source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the YoungA diagnosis of one of the three most common forms of MODY, HNF1A-MODY, GCK-MODY, and HNF4A-MODY, allows for more cost-effective personalized therapy (i.e., no therapy for GCK-MODY and sulfonylureas as first-line therapy for HNF1A-MODY and HNF4A-MODY).
“A diagnosis of one of the three most common forms of MODY, HNF1A-MODY, GCK-MODY, and HNF4A-MODY, allows for more cost-effective personalized therapy (i.e., no therapy for GCK-MODY and sulfonylureas as first-line therapy for HNF1A-MODY and HNF4A-MODY).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Testing IntervalThe rationale for the 3-year interval is that with this interval, the number of false-positive tests that require confirmatory testing will be reduced, and individuals with false-negative tests will be retested before substantial time elapses and complications develop.
“The rationale for the 3-year interval is that with this interval, the number of false-positive tests that require confirmatory testing will be reduced, and individuals with false-negative tests will be retested before substantial time elapses and complications develop (109).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [109] Johnson, 2005, The efficacy and cost of alternative strategies for systematic screening for type 2 diabetes in the U.S. population 45-74 years of age, Diabetes Care source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Cystic Fibrosis-Related DiabetesAnnual OGTTs are perceived as burdensome, and engagement in current CFRD screening guidelines is poor, with only 30% of adults with cystic fibrosis having annual OGTTs.
“Not unexpectedly, annual OGTTs are perceived as burdensome, and engagement in current CFRD screening guidelines is poor, with only 30% of adults with cystic fibrosis having annual OGTTs (128).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [128] Cystic Fibrosis Foundation . Patient Registry 2022 Annual Data Report. Bethesda, MD, Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, 2022. Accessed 5 August 2024. Available from https://www.cff.org/media/31216/download
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ MedicationsNew-onset diabetes is estimated to occur in more than 5% of individuals infected with HIV on PIs, whereas more than 15% may have prediabetes.
“New-onset diabetes is estimated to occur in more than 5% of individuals infected with HIV on PIs, whereas more than 15% may have prediabetes (107).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [107] Monroe, 2015, Diagnosing and managing diabetes in HIV-infected patients: current concepts, Clin Infect Dis source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 2.25Many cases of GDM represent preexisting hyperglycemia that is detected by routine screening in pregnancy, as routine screening is not widely performed in nonpregnant individuals of reproductive age.
“First, the best evidence reveals that many cases of GDM represent preexisting hyperglycemia that is detected by routine screening in pregnancy, as routine screening is not widely performed in nonpregnant individuals of reproductive age.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Routine screening for diabetes is not widely performed in nonpregnant individuals of reproductive age.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Cystic Fibrosis-Related DiabetesThe European Cystic Fibrosis Society Patient Registry reported an increase in CFRD with age (10% increase per decade), genotype, decreased lung function, and female sex.
“The European Cystic Fibrosis Society Patient Registry reported an increase in CFRD with age (10% increase per decade), genotype, decreased lung function, and female sex (133).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [133] Olesen, 2020, Cystic fibrosis related diabetes in Europe: prevalence, risk factors and outcome, J Cyst Fibros source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the YoungDiagnosis of MODY can lead to identification of other affected family members and can indicate potential extrapancreatic complications in affected individuals.
“Additionally, diagnosis can lead to identification of other affected family members and can indicate potential extrapancreatic complications in affected individuals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2.25There was a suggestion of more benefit (per prespecified subgroup analyses) among individuals who had the OGTT at less than 14 weeks and among those with OGTT glycemic values in higher ranges.
“There was also a suggestion of more benefit (per prespecified subgroup analyses) among individuals who had the OGTT at <14 weeks and among those with OGTT glycemic values in higher ranges (180).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [180] Simmons, 2023, Treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosed early in pregnancy, N Engl J Med source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ 2.25A1C is not reliable for screening for GDM or for preexisting diabetes at 15 weeks of gestation or later in part from the higher red blood cell turnover in pregnancy but also from the unknown diabetes status prior to pregnancy, which could help distinguish new-onset diabetes from preexisting diabetes.
“A1C is not reliable for screening for GDM or for preexisting diabetes at 15 weeks of gestation or later in part from the higher red blood cell turnover in pregnancy but also from the unknown diabetes status prior to pregnancy, which could help distinguish new-onset diabetes from preexisting diabetes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [181] Cavagnolli, 2015, Factors affecting A1C in non-diabetic individuals: review and meta-analysis, Clin Chim Acta source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ One-Step StrategyThe one-step method identifies long-term risks of maternal prediabetes and diabetes as well as offspring glucose intolerance and adiposity.
“The one-step method identifies longterm risks of maternal prediabetes and diabetes as well as offspring glucose intolerance and adiposity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Two-Step StrategyIf the two-step approach is implemented, the incidence of GDM will likely increase markedly.
“If this approach is implemented, the incidence of GDM will likely increase markedly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Two-Step StrategyA 2021 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force systematic review concluded that one-step versus two-step screening is associated with increased likelihood of GDM (11.5% vs. 4.9%) but without improved health outcomes.
“A 2021 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force systematic review concluded that onestep versus two-step screening is associated with increased likelihood of GDM (11.5% vs. 4.9%) but without improved health outcomes (205).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [205] Pillay, 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
The paper relies on this without support.
A1C reflects glucose bound to hemoglobin over the life span of the erythrocyte (120 days) and is thus a weighted average that is more heavily affected by recent blood glucose exposure.
“A1C reflects glucose bound to hemoglobin over the life span of the erythrocyte (120 days) and is thus a “weighted” average that is more heavily affected by recent blood glucose exposure.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Some hemoglobin variants can interfere with A1C test results, but this depends on the specific assay.
“Some hemoglobin variants can interfere with A1C test results, but this depends on the specific assay.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Other features classically associated with type 1 diabetes, such as ketosis without acidosis, osmotic symptoms, family history, or a history of autoimmune diseases, are weak discriminators.
“Other features classically associated with type 1 diabetes, such as ketosis without acidosis, osmotic symptoms, family history, or a history of autoimmune diseases, are weak discriminators.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, genetic and environmental factors can result in the progressive loss of b-cell mass and/or function that manifests clinically as hyperglycemia.
“In both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, genetic and environmental factors can result in the progressive loss of b-cell mass and/or function that manifests clinically as hyperglycemia.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Once hyperglycemia occurs, people with all forms of diabetes are at risk for developing the same chronic complications, although rates of progression may differ.
“Once hyperglycemia occurs, people with all forms of diabetes are at risk for developing the same chronic complications, although rates of progression may differ.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The rate of progression of type 1 diabetes is dependent on the age at first detection of an autoantibody, number of autoantibodies, autoantibody specificity, and autoantibody titer.
“The rate of progression is dependent on the age at first detection of an autoantibody, number of autoantibodies, autoantibody specificity, and autoantibody titer.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Application of only a single imperfect autoantibody test for determining LADA classification may lead to misclassification of some individuals with type 2 diabetes.
“At the same time, there is evidence that application of only a single imperfect autoantibody test for determining LADA classification may lead to misclassification of some individuals with type 2 diabetes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The paths to b-cell demise and dysfunction are less well defined in type 2 diabetes, but deficient b-cell insulin secretion, frequently in the setting of insulin resistance, appears to be the common denominator.
“The paths to b-cell demise and dysfunction are less well defined in type 2 diabetes, but deficient b-cell insulin secretion, frequently in the setting of insulin resistance, appears to be the common denominator.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Type 2 diabetes is associated with insulin secretory defects related to genetic predisposition, epigenetic changes, inflammation, and metabolic stress.
“Type 2 diabetes is associated with insulin secretory defects related to genetic predisposition, epigenetic changes, inflammation, and metabolic stress.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Immune-mediated diabetes is the most common form of diabetes in childhood and adolescence, but it can occur at any age.
“Immune-mediated diabetes is the most common form of diabetes in childhood and adolescence, but it can occur at any age.”
The paper relies on this without support.
People with type 1 diabetes are also prone to other autoimmune disorders, such as Hashimoto thyroiditis, Graves disease, celiac disease, Addison disease, vitiligo, autoimmune hepatitis, myasthenia gravis, and pernicious anemia.
“People with type 1 diabetes are also prone to other autoimmune disorders, such as Hashimoto thyroiditis, Graves disease, celiac disease, Addison disease, vitiligo, autoimmune hepatitis, myasthenia gravis, and pernicious anemia (see Section 4, “Comprehensive Medical Evaluation and Assessment of Comorbidities”).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Risk of checkpoint inhibitor-associated type 1 diabetes cannot be predicted by family history or autoantibodies.
“To date, risk cannot be predicted by family history or autoantibodies, so all health care professionals administering these medications or caring for people who have a history of current or past exposure to these agents should be mindful of this adverse effect and educate and monitor individuals appropriately.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A number of viruses have been associated with type 1 diabetes, including enteroviruses such as Coxsackievirus B.
“A number of viruses have been associated with type 1 diabetes, including enteroviruses such as Coxsackievirus B.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Family history of type 1 diabetes increases the risk of developing type 1 diabetes compared with the general population, but the majority, 90%, of individuals who develop type 1 diabetes do not have a known relative with the disease.
“Family history of type 1 diabetes increases the risk of developing type 1 diabetes compared with the general population, but the majority, 90%, of individuals who develop type 1 diabetes do not have a known relative with the disease.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Prediabetes is a significant risk factor for progression to diabetes as well as cardiovascular disease and several other cardiometabolic outcomes.
“As prediabetes is an intermediate state between normoglycemia and diabetes, it is a significant risk factor for progression to diabetes as well as cardiovascular disease and several other cardiometabolic outcomes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Prediabetes is associated with obesity (especially abdominal or visceral obesity), dyslipidemia with high triglycerides and/or low HDL cholesterol, and hypertension.
“Prediabetes is associated with obesity (especially abdominal or visceral obesity), dyslipidemia with high triglycerides and/or low HDL cholesterol, and hypertension.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Type 2 diabetes occurs more frequently in individuals with prediabetes, prior gestational diabetes mellitus, or polycystic ovary syndrome.
“It occurs more frequently in individuals with prediabetes, prior gestational diabetes mellitus, or polycystic ovary syndrome.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Type 2 diabetes is often associated with a strong genetic predisposition or family history in first-degree relatives (more so than type 1 diabetes).
“It is often associated with a strong genetic predisposition or family history in firstdegree relatives (more so than type 1 diabetes).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Both prediabetes and type 2 diabetes are common and impose significant clinical and public health burdens.
“Both conditions are common and impose significant clinical and public health burdens.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is often a long presymptomatic phase before the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes.
“There is often a long presymptomatic phase before the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The duration of glycemic burden is a strong predictor of adverse outcomes.
“The duration of glycemic burden is a strong predictor of adverse outcomes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There are effective interventions that prevent progression from prediabetes to diabetes.
“There are effective interventions that prevent progression from prediabetes to diabetes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Many people in the U.S. and globally either remain undiagnosed or are diagnosed late, when complications have already arisen.
“Despite the numerous benefits of screening and early diagnosis for prediabetes or diabetes, unfortunately many people in the U.S. and globally either remain undiagnosed or are diagnosed late, when complications have already arisen.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Age is a major risk factor for diabetes.
“Age is a major risk factor for diabetes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
30-50% of people with KATP-related neonatal diabetes will exhibit improved blood glucose levels when treated with high-dose oral sulfonylureas instead of insulin.
“30-50% of people with K ATP -related neonatal diabetes will exhibit improved blood glucose levels when treated with high-dose oral sulfonylureas instead of insulin.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Routine screening for diabetes is not widely performed in nonpregnant individuals of reproductive age.
“as routine screening is not widely performed in nonpregnant individuals of reproductive age.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Strong racial and ethnic disparities exist in the prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes.
“Strong racial and ethnic disparities exist in the prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Most randomized controlled trials of treatment of early abnormal glucose metabolism have been underpowered for outcomes.
“Most randomized controlled trials of treatment of early abnormal glucose metabolism have been underpowered for outcomes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The IADPSG criteria (one-step strategy) have been adopted internationally as the preferred approach.
“The IADPSG criteria (one-step strategy) have been adopted internationally as the preferred approach.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Guidelines from the ADA and WHO recommend alternative diagnostic approaches, such as fasting glucose, OGTT, or short-term glycation markers, when hemoglobinopathies are suspected or confirmed.
“Guidelines from the ADA and WHO recommend alternative diagnostic approaches, such as fasting glucose, OGTT, or short-term glycation markers (such as fructosamine and glycated albumin), when hemoglobinopathies are suspected or confirmed (47,48).”
From Comparison of point‑of‑care HbA1c devices with laboratory HPLC methods: A systematic review and meta‑analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [48]
Recommendation 2.4 (section 2.2a; page unavailable) says to use plasma-glucose criteria for diagnosis when some hemoglobin variants alter the relationship between A1C and glycemia; section 2.1a includes fasting glucose and OGTT among those criteria. The paper does not recommend fructosamine or glycated albumin as diagnostic alternatives: “Confirming the Diagnosis” describes them as measures approved for monitoring glycemic management. It also says an A1C assay without variant interference can be used for some people with a hemoglobin variant. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIntensified surveillance is also warranted in those with prior gestational diabetes (GDM), due to increased T2D risk.
“Intensified surveillance is also warranted in those with prior gestational diabetes (GDM), due to increased T2D risk.46”
From 2026 AHA/ACC/ADA/ASN Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome (2026) · cites this paper as [46]
Several studies found that GLP-1-based therapies would not be cost-effective compared with usual care, especially when used as first-line therapy.
“In general, these studies found that GLP-1–based therapies would not be cost-effective compared with usual care, especially when used as first-line therapy.”
From 2026 AHA/ACC/ADA/ASN Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome (2026) · cites this paper as [46]
Our copy discusses cost-effectiveness in relation to diabetes screening and genetic diagnosis, including gestational diabetes screening in “Future Considerations” (page unavailable). Searches for GLP-1, usual care, and first-line therapy found no passage assessing the cost-effectiveness of GLP-1–based therapies. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredGLP-1 RAs appear to primarily reduce the risk of atherosclerotic events, such as MI and stroke.
“In contrast, GLP-1 RAs appear to primarily reduce the risk of atherosclerotic events, such as MI and stroke.45–48”
From 2026 AHA/ACC/ADA/ASN Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome (2026) · cites this paper as [46]
The Medications passage discusses drugs associated with diabetes risk, while Diagnosis of Prediabetes discusses cardiovascular risk associated with A1C; neither addresses cardiovascular effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists. Searches for GLP-1, atherosclerotic events, MI, and stroke found no passage in our copy supporting the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredCurrent data do not determine whether HF event risk is greater with sodium zirconium cyclosilicate versus patiromer.
“Current data do not determine whether HF event risk is greater with sodium zirconium cyclosilicate versus patiromer.46”
From 2026 AHA/ACC/ADA/ASN Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome (2026) · cites this paper as [46]
The supplied passages concern diabetes diagnosis, and searches of the indexed paper for sodium zirconium cyclosilicate, patiromer, potassium binders, and heart-failure risk found no passage comparing heart-failure events with the two drugs. Our copy therefore does not address the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
SGLT2i reduce the incidence of hyperkalemia during RASi treatment.
“SGLT2i reduce the incidence of hyperkalemia during RASi treatment.46”
From 2026 AHA/ACC/ADA/ASN Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome (2026) · cites this paper as [46]
The Type 2 Diabetes section mentions SGLT2 inhibitors in connection with diabetic ketoacidosis, not hyperkalemia. Searches for hyperkalemia, RASi, and renin–angiotensin system blockade found no passage in our copy addressing whether SGLT2 inhibitors reduce hyperkalemia during RASi treatment. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Cites
Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin
(2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa012512 · Cited by 19,011 · see citing works
International Diabetes Federation 2017
Carracher, A. M., Marathe, P. H., & Close, K. L. (2018) · Journal of Diabetes · doi:10.1111/1753-0407.12644 · Cited by 13,369 · see citing works
Tuomilehto, J., Lindström, J., Eriksson, J. G., Valle, T. T., Hämäläinen, H., Ilanne-Parikka, P., Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi, S., Laakso, M., Louheranta, A., Rastas, M., et al. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200105033441801 · Cited by 10,873 · see citing works
Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus
The Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus* (2002) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.25.2007.s5 · Cited by 10,320 · see citing works
IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2017 and projections for 2045
Cho, N. H., Shaw, J. E., Karuranga, S., Huang, Y., da Rocha Fernandes, J. D., Ohlrogge, A. W., & Malanda, B. (2018) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2018.02.023 · Cited by 7,283 · see citing works
Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus
The Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus (1997) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.20.7.1183 · Cited by 6,220 · see citing works
Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus
American Diabetes Association (2014) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc14-s081 · Cited by 5,974 · see citing works
Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes
(2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0707943 · Cited by 5,563 · see citing works
Classification and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and other categories of glucose intolerance.
National Diabetes Data Group (1979) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/diab.28.12.1039 · Cited by 4,909 · see citing works
International Expert Committee report on the role of the A1c assay in the diagnosis of diabetes
The International Expert Committee (2009) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc09-9033 · Cited by 3,185 · see citing works
Effect of Treatment of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus on Pregnancy Outcomes
Crowther, C. A., Hiller, J. E., Moss, J. R., McPhee, A. J., Jeffries, W. S., & Robinson, J. S. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa042973 · Cited by 3,159 · see citing works
Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus
The Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus (2003) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.26.2007.s5 · Cited by 2,689 · see citing works
Gestational Diabetes and the Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes
Kim, C., Newton, K. M., & Knopp, R. H. (2002) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.25.10.1862 · Cited by 2,276 · see citing works
A Multicenter, Randomized Trial of Treatment for Mild Gestational Diabetes
Landon, M. B., Spong, C. Y., Thom, E., Carpenter, M. W., Ramin, S. M., Casey, B., Wapner, R. J., Varner, M. W., Rouse, D. J., Thorp, J. M., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0902430 · Cited by 2,122 · see citing works
Criteria for screening tests for gestational diabetes
Carpenter, M. W., & Coustan, D. R. (1982) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0002-9378(82)90349-0 · Cited by 1,924 · see citing works
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 190: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
(2018) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002501 · Cited by 1,820 · see citing works
Consensus development conference on antipsychotic drugs and obesity and diabetes
American Diabetes Association, American Psychiatric Association, American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, & North American Association for the Study of Obesity (2004) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.27.2.596 · Cited by 1,554 · see citing works
Glycated hemoglobin, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk in nondiabetic adults
Selvin, E., Steffes, M. W., Zhu, H., Matsushita, K., Wagenknecht, L., Pankow, J., Coresh, J., & Brancati, F. L. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0908359 · Cited by 1,544 · see citing works
Self-citationSeroconversion to multiple islet autoantibodies and risk of progression to diabetes in children
Ziegler, A. G., Rewers, M., Simell, O., Simell, T., Lempainen, J., Steck, A., Winkler, C., Ilonen, J., Veijola, R., Knip, M., et al. (2013) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2013.6285 · Cited by 1,312 · see citing works
(1964) · PubMed · Cited by 1,230 · see citing works
Insel, R. A., Dunne, J. L., Atkinson, M. A., Chiang, J. L., Dabelea, D., Gottlieb, P. A., Greenbaum, C. J., Herold, K. C., Krischer, J. P., Lernmark, Å., et al. (2015) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc15-1419 · Cited by 1,216 · see citing works
An anti-CD3 antibody, teplizumab, in relatives at risk for type 1 diabetes
Herold, K. C., Bundy, B. N., Long, S. A., Bluestone, J. A., DiMeglio, L. A., Dufort, M. J., Gitelman, S. E., Gottlieb, P. A., Krischer, J. P., Linsley, P. S., et al. (2019) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1902226 · Cited by 1,189 · see citing works
Vounzoulaki, E., Khunti, K., Abner, S. C., Tan, B. K., Davies, M. J., & Gillies, C. L. (2020) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.m1361 · Cited by 1,150 · see citing works
Self-citationGregory, G. A., Robinson, T. I. G., Linklater, S. E., Wang, F., Colagiuri, S., de Beaufort, C., Donaghue, K. C., Harding, J. L., Wander, P. L., Zhang, X., et al. (2022) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(22)00218-2 · Cited by 1,149 · see citing works
Genetic analyses of diverse populations improves discovery for complex traits
Wojcik, G. L., Graff, M., Nishimura, K. K., Tao, R., Haessler, J., Gignoux, C. R., Highland, H. M., Patel, Y. M., Sorokin, E. P., Avery, C. L., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1310-4 · Cited by 1,033 · see citing works
Lean, M. E. J., Leslie, W. S., Barnes, A. C., Brosnahan, N., Thom, G., McCombie, L., Peters, C., Zhyzhneuskaya, S., Al-Mrabeh, A., Hollingsworth, K. G., et al. (2019) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(19)30068-3 · Cited by 981 · see citing works
Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus
The Expert Committee On The Diagnosis And Classification Of Diabetes Mellitus (1998) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.21.1.s5 · Cited by 908 · see citing works
Ratner, R. E., Christophi, C. A., Metzger, B. E., Dabelea, D., Bennett, P. H., Pi-Sunyer, X., Fowler, S., Kahn, S. E., & The Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group (2008) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2008-0772 · Cited by 867 · see citing works
Differentiation of diabetes by pathophysiology, natural history, and prognosis
Skyler, J. S., Bakris, G. L., Bonifacio, E., Darsow, T., Eckel, R. H., Groop, L., Groop, P.-H., Handelsman, Y., Insel, R. A., Mathieu, C., et al. (2017) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/db16-0806 · Cited by 823 · see citing works
Clinical Care Guidelines for Cystic Fibrosis–Related Diabetes
Moran, A., Brunzell, C., Cohen, R. C., Katz, M., Marshall, B. C., Onady, G. M., Robinson, K. A., Sabadosa, K. A., Stecenko, A. A., & Slovis, B. S. (2010) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc10-1768 · Cited by 733 · see citing works
Maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY): how many cases are we missing?
Shields, B. M., Hicks, S., Shepherd, M. H., Colclough, K., Hattersley, A. T., & Ellard, S. (2010) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-010-1799-4 · Cited by 725 · see citing works
Holt, R. I. G., DeVries, J. H., Hess-Fischl, A., Hirsch, I. B., Kirkman, M. S., Klupa, T., Ludwig, B., Nørgaard, K., Pettus, J., Renard, E., et al. (2021) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dci21-0043 · Cited by 699 · see citing works
Cowie, C. C., Rust, K. F., Byrd-Holt, D. D., Gregg, E. W., Ford, E. S., Geiss, L. S., Bainbridge, K. E., & Fradkin, J. E. (2010) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc09-1524 · Cited by 689 · see citing works
Sacks, D. A., Hadden, D. R., Maresh, M., Deerochanawong, C., Dyer, A. R., Metzger, B. E., Lowe, L. P., Coustan, D. R., Hod, M., Oats, J. J. N., et al. (2012) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc11-1641 · Cited by 687 · see citing works
Lowe, W. L., Scholtens, D. M., Lowe, L. P., Kuang, A., Nodzenski, M., Talbot, O., Catalano, P. M., Linder, B., Brickman, W. J., Clayton, P., et al. (2018) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2018.11628 · Cited by 591 · see citing works
Collateral damage: Insulin-dependent diabetes induced with checkpoint inhibitors
Stamatouli, A. M., Quandt, Z., Perdigoto, A. L., Clark, P. L., Kluger, H., Weiss, S. A., Gettinger, S., Sznol, M., Young, A., Rushakoff, R., et al. (2018) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/dbi18-0002 · Cited by 590 · see citing works
Herman, W. H., Ma, Y., Uwaifo, G., Haffner, S., Kahn, S. E., Horton, E. S., Lachin, J. M., Montez, M. G., Brenneman, T., Barrett-Connor, E., et al. (2007) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc06-2003 · Cited by 574 · see citing works
Lowe, W. L., Scholtens, D. M., Kuang, A., Linder, B., Lawrence, J. M., Lebenthal, Y., McCance, D., Hamilton, J., Nodzenski, M., Talbot, O., et al. (2019) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc18-1646 · Cited by 574 · see citing works
Diabetic emergencies - ketoacidosis, hyperglycaemic hyperosmolar state and hypoglycaemia
Umpierrez, G., & Korytkowski, M. (2016) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/nrendo.2016.15 · Cited by 563 · see citing works
Sharif, A., Hecking, M., de Vries, A. P. J., Porrini, E., Hornum, M., Rasoul-Rockenschaub, S., Berlakovich, G., Krebs, M., Kautzky-Willer, A., Schernthaner, G., et al. (2014) · American Journal of Transplantation · doi:10.1111/ajt.12850 · Cited by 532 · see citing works
Diabetes, pancreatogenic diabetes, and pancreatic cancer
Andersen, D. K., Korc, M., Petersen, G. M., Eibl, G., Li, D., Rickels, M. R., Chari, S. T., & Abbruzzese, J. L. (2017) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/db16-1477 · Cited by 516 · see citing works
Aroda, V. R., Christophi, C. A., Edelstein, S. L., Zhang, P., Herman, W. H., Barrett-Connor, E., Delahanty, L. M., Montez, M. G., Ackermann, R. T., Zhuo, X., et al. (2015) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2014-3761 · Cited by 467 · see citing works
the TEDDY Study Group, Krischer, J. P., Lynch, K. F., Schatz, D. A., Ilonen, J., Lernmark, Å., Hagopian, W. A., Rewers, M. J., She, J.-X., Simell, O. G., et al. (2015) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-015-3514-y · Cited by 444 · see citing works
A1C level and future risk of diabetes: a systematic review
Zhang, X., Gregg, E. W., Williamson, D. F., Barker, L. E., Thomas, W., Bullard, K. M., Imperatore, G., Williams, D. E., & Albright, A. L. (2010) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc09-1939 · Cited by 422 · see citing works
Buchanan, T. A., Xiang, A., Kjos, S. L., & Watanabe, R. (2007) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc07-s201 · Cited by 417 · see citing works
Wheeler, E., Leong, A., Liu, C.-T., Hivert, M.-F., Strawbridge, R. J., Podmore, C., Li, M., Yao, J., Sim, X., Hong, J., et al. (2017) · PLOS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002383 · Cited by 408 · see citing works
Self-citationPrediabetes and what it means: the epidemiological evidence
Echouffo-Tcheugui, J. B., & Selvin, E. (2021) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-102644 · Cited by 406 · see citing works
Self-citationChung, W. K., Erion, K., Florez, J. C., Hattersley, A. T., Hivert, M.-F., Lee, C. G., McCarthy, M. I., Nolan, J. J., Norris, J. M., Pearson, E. R., et al. (2020) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dci20-0022 · Cited by 400 · see citing works
Pihoker, C., Gilliam, L. K., Ellard, S., Dabelea, D., Davis, C., Dolan, L. M., Greenbaum, C. J., Imperatore, G., Lawrence, J. M., Marcovina, S. M., et al. (2013) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2013-1279 · Cited by 397 · see citing works
Taheri, S., Zaghloul, H., Chagoury, O., Elhadad, S., Ahmed, S. H., El Khatib, N., Amona, R. A., El Nahas, K., Suleiman, N., Alnaama, A., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(20)30117-0 · Cited by 393 · see citing works
Schambelan, M., Benson, C. A., Carr, A., Currier, J. S., Dubé, M. P., Gerber, J. G., Grinspoon, S. K., Grunfeld, C., Kotler, D. P., Mulligan, K., et al. (2002) · JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes · doi:10.1097/00126334-200211010-00001 · Cited by 379 · see citing works
In Utero Exposure to Maternal Hyperglycemia Increases Childhood Cardiometabolic Risk in Offspring
Tam, W. H., Ma, R. C. W., Ozaki, R., Li, A. M., Chan, M. H. M., Yuen, L. Y., Lao, T. T. H., Yang, X., Ho, C. S., Tutino, G. E., et al. (2017) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc16-2397 · Cited by 366 · see citing works
Sharp, S. A., Rich, S. S., Wood, A. R., Jones, S. E., Beaumont, R. N., Harrison, J. W., Schneider, D. A., Locke, J. M., Tyrrell, J., Weedon, M. N., et al. (2019) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc18-1785 · Cited by 366 · see citing works
Treatment of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Diagnosed Early in Pregnancy
Simmons, D., Immanuel, J., Hague, W. M., Teede, H., Nolan, C. J., Peek, M. J., Flack, J. R., McLean, M., Wong, V., Hibbert, E., et al. (2023) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2214956 · Cited by 366 · see citing works
Sacks, D. B., Arnold, M., Bakris, G. L., Bruns, D. E., Horvath, A. R., Lernmark, Å., Metzger, B. E., Nathan, D. M., & Kirkman, M. S. (2023) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dci23-0036 · Cited by 351 · see citing works
De Franco, E., Flanagan, S. E., Houghton, J. A., Allen, H. L., Mackay, D. J., Temple, I. K., Ellard, S., & Hattersley, A. T. (2015) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60098-8 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
Arslanian, S., Bacha, F., Grey, M., Marcus, M. D., White, N. H., & Zeitler, P. (2018) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dci18-0052 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
Feig, D. S., Hwee, J., Shah, B. R., Booth, G. L., Bierman, A. S., & Lipscombe, L. L. (2014) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc13-2717 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Landry, L. G., Ali, N., Williams, D. R., Rehm, H. L., & Bonham, V. L. (2018) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1595 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
Zhu, W.-W., Yang, H.-X., Wei, Y.-M., Yan, J., Wang, Z.-L., Li, X.-L., Wu, H.-R., Li, N., Zhang, M.-H., Liu, X.-H., et al. (2013) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc12-1157 · Cited by 338 · see citing works
Schwartz, S. S., Epstein, S., Corkey, B. E., Grant, S. F. A., Gavin, J. R., & Aguilar, R. B. (2016) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc15-1585 · Cited by 330 · see citing works
Post-Transplant Diabetes Mellitus: Causes, Treatment, and Impact on Outcomes
Shivaswamy, V., Boerner, B., & Larsen, J. (2016) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2015-1084 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
Fall in C-Peptide During First 2 Years From Diagnosis
Greenbaum, C. J., Beam, C. A., Boulware, D., Gitelman, S. E., Gottlieb, P. A., Herold, K. C., Lachin, J. M., McGee, P., Palmer, J. P., Pescovitz, M. D., et al. (2012) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/db11-1538 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Yield of a public health screening of children for islet autoantibodies in Bavaria, Germany
Ziegler, A.-G., Kick, K., Bonifacio, E., Haupt, F., Hippich, M., Dunstheimer, D., Lang, M., Laub, O., Warncke, K., Lange, K., et al. (2020) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2019.21565 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
Scholtens, D. M., Kuang, A., Lowe, L. P., Hamilton, J., Lawrence, J. M., Lebenthal, Y., Brickman, W. J., Clayton, P., Ma, R. C., McCance, D., et al. (2019) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc18-2021 · Cited by 310 · see citing works
Bergenstal, R. M., Gal, R. L., Connor, C. G., Gubitosi-Klug, R., Kruger, D., Olson, B. A., Willi, S. M., Aleppo, G., Weinstock, R. S., Wood, J., et al. (2017) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m16-2596 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
Self-citationWoodmansey, C., McGovern, A. P., McCullough, K. A., Whyte, M. B., Munro, N. M., Correa, A. C., Gatenby, P. A. C., Jones, S. A., & de Lusignan, S. (2017) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc17-0542 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
(2013) · PubMed · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Hyperglycemic crises in adults with diabetes: a consensus report
Umpierrez, G. E., Davis, G. M., ElSayed, N. A., Fadini, G. P., Galindo, R. J., Hirsch, I. B., Klonoff, D. C., McCoy, R. G., Misra, S., Gabbay, R. A., et al. (2024) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dci24-0032 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
Self-citationAdult-onset autoimmune diabetes: current knowledge and implications for management
Buzzetti, R., Zampetti, S., & Maddaloni, E. (2017) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/nrendo.2017.99 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
A pragmatic, randomized clinical trial of gestational diabetes screening
Hillier, T. A., Pedula, K. L., Ogasawara, K. K., Vesco, K. K., Oshiro, C. E. S., Lubarsky, S. L., & Van Marter, J. (2021) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2026028 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
Age-related islet autoantibody incidence in offspring of patients with type 1 diabetes
the BABYDIAB-BABYDIET Study Group, Ziegler, A.-G., & Bonifacio, E. (2012) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-012-2472-x · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Wagenknecht, L. E., Lawrence, J. M., Isom, S., Jensen, E. T., Dabelea, D., Liese, A. D., Dolan, L. M., Shah, A. S., Bellatorre, A., Sauder, K., et al. (2023) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(23)00025-6 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Hagopian, W. A., Erlich, H., Lernmark, Å., Rewers, M., Ziegler, A. G., Simell, O., Akolkar, B., Vogt, R., Blair, A., Ilonen, J., et al. (2011) · Pediatric Diabetes · doi:10.1111/j.1399-5448.2011.00774.x · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Orban, T., Sosenko, J. M., Cuthbertson, D., Krischer, J. P., Skyler, J. S., Jackson, R., Yu, L., Palmer, J. P., Schatz, D., Eisenbarth, G., et al. (2009) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc09-0934 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Mild gestational diabetes mellitus and long-term child health
Landon, M. B., Rice, M. M., Varner, M. W., Casey, B. M., Reddy, U. M., Wapner, R. J., Rouse, D. J., Biggio, J. R., Thorp, J. M., Chien, E. K., et al. (2015) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc14-2159 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
SGLT2 inhibitors and diabetic ketoacidosis: data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System
Fadini, G. P., Bonora, B. M., & Avogaro, A. (2017) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-017-4301-8 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Insulin Therapy to Improve BMI in Cystic Fibrosis–Related Diabetes Without Fasting Hyperglycemia
Moran, A., Pekow, P., Grover, P., Zorn, M., Slovis, B., Pilewski, J., Tullis, E., Liou, T. G., Allen, H., & the Cystic Fibrosis Related Diabetes Therapy Study Group (2009) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc09-0585 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Parikka, V., Näntö-Salonen, K., Saarinen, M., Simell, T., Ilonen, J., Hyöty, H., Veijola, R., Knip, M., & Simell, O. (2012) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-012-2523-3 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Diabetes mellitus secondary to pancreatic diseases (type 3c)—are we neglecting an important disease?
Ewald, N., & Bretzel, R. G. (2013) · European Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2012.12.017 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Lenters-Westra, E., & Slingerland, R. J. (2010) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2009.130641 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Barker, J. M., Goehrig, S. H., Barriga, K., Hoffman, M., Slover, R., Eisenbarth, G. S., Norris, J. M., Klingensmith, G. J., & Rewers, M. (2004) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.27.6.1399 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Greeley, S. A. W., Polak, M., Njølstad, P. R., Barbetti, F., Williams, R., Castano, L., Raile, K., Chi, D. V., Habeb, A., Hattersley, A. T., et al. (2022) · Pediatric Diabetes · doi:10.1111/pedi.13426 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Racial differences in glycemic markers: a cross-sectional analysis of community-based data
Selvin, E., Steffes, M. W., Ballantyne, C. M., Hoogeveen, R. C., Coresh, J., & Brancati, F. L. (2011) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-154-5-201103010-00004 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Self-citationIs pancreatic diabetes (type 3c diabetes) underdiagnosed and misdiagnosed?
Hardt, P. D., Brendel, M. D., Kloer, H. U., & Bretzel, R. G. (2008) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc08-s244 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Steck, A. K., Vehik, K., Bonifacio, E., Lernmark, A., Ziegler, A.-G., Hagopian, W. A., She, J., Simell, O., Akolkar, B., Krischer, J., et al. (2015) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc14-2426 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Thomas, N. J., Lynam, A. L., Hill, A. V., Weedon, M. N., Shields, B. M., Oram, R. A., McDonald, T. J., Hattersley, A. T., & Jones, A. G. (2019) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-019-4863-8 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Issues with the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in early pregnancy
McIntyre, H. D., Sacks, D. A., Barbour, L. A., Feig, D. S., Catalano, P. M., Damm, P., & McElduff, A. (2016) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc15-1887 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Distribution of HbA1c Levels For Children and Young Adults in the U.S.
Saaddine, J. B., Fagot-Campagna, A., Rolka, D., Narayan, K. M. V., Geiss, L., Eberhardt, M., & Flegal, K. M. (2002) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.25.8.1326 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Zhong, V. W., Juhaeri, J., & Mayer-Davis, E. J. (2018) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc17-1583 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Treatments for gestational diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Farrar, D., Simmonds, M., Bryant, M., Sheldon, T. A., Tuffnell, D., Golder, S., & Lawlor, D. A. (2017) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015557 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Wohl, D. A., McComsey, G. A., Tebas, P., Brown, T. T., Glesby, M. J., Reeds, D. N., Shikuma, C. M., Mulligan, K. M., Dubé, M. P., Wininger, D. A., et al. (2006) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/507333 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Kimpimäki, T., Kulmala, P., Savola, K., Kupila, A., Korhonen, S., Simell, T., Ilonen, J., Simell, O., & Knip, M. (2002) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2002-020018 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
A1C underestimates glycemia in HIV infection
Kim, P. S., Woods, C., Georgoff, P., Crum, D., Rosenberg, A., Smith, M., & Hadigan, C. (2009) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc09-0177 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Sussman, J. B., Kent, D. M., Nelson, J. P., & Hayward, R. A. (2015) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.h454 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Lynam, A. L., Dennis, J. M., Owen, K. R., Oram, R. A., Jones, A. G., Shields, B. M., & Ferrat, L. A. (2020) · Diagnostic and Prognostic Research · doi:10.1186/s41512-020-00075-2 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group (2015) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc14-0886 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Cost and cost-effectiveness of large-scale screening for type 1 diabetes in Colorado
McQueen, R. B., Geno Rasmussen, C., Waugh, K., Frohnert, B. I., Steck, A. K., Yu, L., Baxter, J., & Rewers, M. (2020) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc19-2003 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Jensen, E. T., Stafford, J. M., Saydah, S., D’Agostino, R. B., Dolan, L. M., Lawrence, J. M., Marcovina, S., Mayer-Davis, E. J., Pihoker, C., Rewers, A., et al. (2021) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc20-0389 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
SGLT2 inhibitors and amputations in the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System
Fadini, G. P., & Avogaro, A. (2017) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(17)30257-7 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Wahabi, H. A., Fayed, A., Esmaeil, S., Elmorshedy, H., Titi, M. A., Amer, Y. S., Alzeidan, R. A., Alodhayani, A. A., Saeed, E., Bahkali, K. H., et al. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0237571 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Mei, Z., Wang, F., Bhosle, A., Dong, D., Mehta, R. S., Ghazi, A. R., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Rinott, E., Ma, S., et al. (2024) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-024-03067-7 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Diagnosing and managing diabetes in HIV-infected patients: current concepts
Monroe, A. K., Glesby, M. J., & Brown, T. T. (2015) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciu779 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Hyperglycemia during the immediate period after kidney transplantation
Chakkera, H. A., Weil, E. J., Castro, J., Heilman, R. L., Reddy, K. S., Mazur, M. J., Hamawi, K., Mulligan, D. C., Moss, A. A., Mekeel, K. L., et al. (2009) · Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.2215/cjn.05471008 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Sosenko, J. M., Skyler, J. S., Palmer, J. P., Krischer, J. P., Yu, L., Mahon, J., Beam, C. A., Boulware, D. C., Rafkin, L., Schatz, D., et al. (2013) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc13-0425 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Mayo, K., Melamed, N., Vandenberghe, H., & Berger, H. (2015) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2014.08.027 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Brown, F. M., & Wyckoff, J. (2017) · Current Diabetes Reports · doi:10.1007/s11892-017-0922-z · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Jones, A. G., McDonald, T. J., Shields, B. M., Hagopian, W., & Hattersley, A. T. (2021) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc20-2834 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
THE NECESSITY OF A STANDARD PREPARATORY DIET
CONN, J. W. (1940) · The American Journal of the Medical Sciences · doi:10.1097/00000441-194004000-00014 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Personalized type 2 diabetes management: an update on recent advances and recommendations
Williams, D. M., Jones, H., & Stephens, J. W. (2022) · Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy · doi:10.2147/dmso.s331654 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Novel views on new-onset diabetes after transplantation: development, prevention and treatment
Hecking, M., Werzowa, J., Haidinger, M., Horl, W. H., Pascual, J., Budde, K., Luan, F. L., Ojo, A., de Vries, A. P. J., Porrini, E., et al. (2013) · Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfs583 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Diabetic ketoacidosis at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes in Colorado children, 2010-2017
Alonso, G. T., Coakley, A., Pyle, L., Manseau, K., Thomas, S., & Rewers, A. (2020) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc19-0428 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Robbins, C., Boulet, S. L., Morgan, I., D’Angelo, D. V., Zapata, L. B., Morrow, B., Sharma, A., & Kroelinger, C. D. (2018) · MMWR Surveillance Summaries · doi:10.15585/mmwr.ss6701a1 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Meijnikman, A. S., De Block, C. E. M., Dirinck, E., Verrijken, A., Mertens, I., Corthouts, B., & Van Gaal, L. F. (2017) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/ijo.2017.165 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Identifying Adults at High Risk for Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease Using Hemoglobin A1c
Ackermann, R. T., Cheng, Y. J., Williamson, D. F., & Gregg, E. W. (2011) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2010.09.022 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Yumei, W., Huixia, Y., Weiwei, Z., Hongyun, Y., Haixia, L., Jie, Y., & Cuilin, Z. (2014) · Chinese Medical Journal · doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20140898 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Thomas, M. C., Mathew, T. H., Russ, G. R., Rao, M. M., & Moran, J. (2001) · Transplantation · doi:10.1097/00007890-200110150-00024 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Trends in the incidence of diabetes, its clinical sequelae, and associated costs in pregnancy
Jovanovič, L., Liang, Y., Weng, W., Hamilton, M., Chen, L., & Wintfeld, N. (2015) · Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews · doi:10.1002/dmrr.2656 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Feldman, R. K., Tieu, R. S., & Yasumura, L. (2016) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000001132 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Elding Larsson, H., Vehik, K., Gesualdo, P., Akolkar, B., Hagopian, W., Krischer, J., Lernmark, Å., Rewers, M., Simell, O., She, J.-X., et al. (2014) · Pediatric Diabetes · doi:10.1111/pedi.12066 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Reversion of β-Cell Autoimmunity Changes Risk of Type 1 Diabetes: TEDDY Study
Vehik, K., Lynch, K. F., Schatz, D. A., Akolkar, B., Hagopian, W., Rewers, M., She, J.-X., Simell, O., Toppari, J., Ziegler, A.-G., et al. (2016) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc16-0181 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Hirst, J. A., McLellan, J. H., Price, C. P., English, E., Feakins, B. G., Stevens, R. J., & Farmer, A. J. (2017) · Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) · doi:10.1515/cclm-2016-0303 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Personalized Type 2 Diabetes Management: An Update on Recent Advances and Recommendations
Williams, D. M., Jones, H. F., & Stephens, J. W. (2022) · Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Total Pancreatectomy With Islet Autotransplantation
Bellin, M. D., Gelrud, A., Arreaza-Rubín, G., Dunn, T. B., Humar, A., Morgan, K. A., Naziruddin, B., Rastellini, C., Rickels, M. R., Schwarzenberg, S. J., et al. (2014) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000001059 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Palladino, R., Tabak, A. G., Khunti, K., Valabhji, J., Majeed, A., Millett, C., & Vamos, E. P. (2020) · BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care · doi:10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001061 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Self-citationSelvin, E. (2016) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc16-0042 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Self-citationEthridge, J. K., Catalano, P. M., & Waters, T. P. (2014) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000000412 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Cystic fibrosis related diabetes in Europe: prevalence, risk factors and outcome; Olesen et al
Olesen, H. V., Drevinek, P., Gulmans, V. A., Hatziagorou, E., Jung, A., Mei-Zahav, M., Stojnic, N., Thomas, M., & Zolin, A. (2020) · Journal of Cystic Fibrosis · doi:10.1016/j.jcf.2019.10.009 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Ode, K. L., Ballman, M., Battezzati, A., Brennan, A., Chan, C. L., Hameed, S., Ismail, H. M., Kelly, A., Moran, A. M., Rabasa‐Lhoret, R., et al. (2022) · Pediatric Diabetes · doi:10.1111/pedi.13453 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Peng, T. Y., Ehrlich, S. F., Crites, Y., Kitzmiller, J. L., Kuzniewicz, M. W., Hedderson, M. M., & Ferrara, A. (2017) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2016.10.007 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Immune checkpoint inhibitors and risk of type 1 diabetes
Chen, X., Affinati, A. H., Lee, Y., Turcu, A. F., Henry, N. L., Schiopu, E., Qin, A., Othus, M., Clauw, D., Ramnath, N., et al. (2022) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc21-2213 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Does diabetes prevention translate into reduced long-term vascular complications of diabetes?
and the DPP Research Group, Nathan, D. M., Bennett, P. H., Crandall, J. P., Edelstein, S. L., Goldberg, R. B., Kahn, S. E., Knowler, W. C., Mather, K. J., Mudaliar, S., et al. (2019) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-019-4928-8 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Emerging treatments for post-transplantation diabetes mellitus
Jenssen, T., & Hartmann, A. (2015) · Nature Reviews Nephrology · doi:10.1038/nrneph.2015.59 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Sharif, A., Moore, R. H., & Baboolal, K. (2006) · Transplantation · doi:10.1097/01.tp.0000250924.99855.42 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Ethnic disparities in gestational diabetes
Yuen, L., Wong, V. W., & Simmons, D. (2018) · Current Diabetes Reports · doi:10.1007/s11892-018-1040-2 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Hope, S. V., Wienand-Barnett, S., Shepherd, M., King, S. M., Fox, C., Khunti, K., Oram, R. A., Knight, B. A., Hattersley, A. T., Jones, A. G., et al. (2016) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp16x684961 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Self-citationA Global Perspective of Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in Adults
Mishra, R., Hodge, K. M., Cousminer, D. L., Leslie, R. D., & Grant, S. F. A. (2018) · Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.tem.2018.07.001 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Glycosylated haemoglobin for screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus
Khalafallah, A., Phuah, E., Al-Barazan, A. M., Nikakis, I., Radford, A., Clarkson, W., Trevett, C., Brain, T., Gebski, V., & Corbould, A. (2016) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011059 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Frommer, L., & Kahaly, G. J. (2019) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2019-00602 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Carmody, D., Naylor, R. N., Bell, C. D., Berry, S., Montgomery, J. T., Tadie, E. C., Hwang, J. L., Greeley, S. A. W., & Philipson, L. H. (2016) · Acta Diabetologica · doi:10.1007/s00592-016-0859-8 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Management of pancreatogenic diabetes: challenges and solutions
Makuc, J. (2016) · Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy · doi:10.2147/dmso.s99701 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Screening type 1 diabetes and celiac disease by law
Bosi, E., & Catassi, C. (2023) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(23)00354-6 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Petrov, M. S., & Basina, M. (2021) · European Journal of Endocrinology · doi:10.1530/eje-20-0974 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Phillip, M., Achenbach, P., Addala, A., Albanese-O’Neill, A., Battelino, T., Bell, K. J., Besser, R. E. J., Bonifacio, E. E., Colhoun, H. M., Couper, J., et al. (2024) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-024-06205-5 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Self-citationUtility of genetic risk scores in type 1 diabetes
Luckett, A. M., Weedon, M. N., Hawkes, G., Leslie, R. D., Oram, R. A., & Grant, S. F. A. (2023) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-023-05955-y · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Phillip, M., Achenbach, P., Addala, A., Albanese-O’Neill, A., Battelino, T., Bell, K. J., Besser, R. E. J., Bonifacio, E., Colhoun, H. M., Couper, J. J., et al. (2024) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dci24-0042 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Self-citationMcKeigue, P., Spiliopoulou, A., McGurnaghan, S. J., Colombo, M., Blackbourn, L. A. K., McDonald, T. J., Onengut-Gomuscu, S., Rich, S. S., Palmer, C. N. A., McKnight, J. A., et al. (2019) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-019-1392-8 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Screening for prediabetes and type 2 diabetes in dental offices
Herman, W. H., Taylor, G. W., Jacobson, J. J., Burke, R., & Brown, M. B. (2015) · Journal of Public Health Dentistry · doi:10.1111/jphd.12082 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Sosenko, J. M., Palmer, J. P., Rafkin-Mervis, L., Krischer, J. P., Cuthbertson, D., Mahon, J., Greenbaum, C. J., Cowie, C. C., Skyler, J. S., & the Diabetes Prevention Trial–Type 1 Study Group (2009) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc08-2140 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Dental findings and identification of undiagnosed hyperglycemia
Lalla, E., Cheng, B., Kunzel, C., Burkett, S., & Lamster, I. B. (2013) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/0022034513502791 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Johnson, S. L., Tabaei, B. P., & Herman, W. H. (2005) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.28.2.307 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Selvin, E., Wang, D., Matsushita, K., Grams, M. E., & Coresh, J. (2018) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m18-0091 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Self-citationLynam, A., McDonald, T., Hill, A., Dennis, J., Oram, R., Pearson, E., Weedon, M., Hattersley, A., Owen, K., Shields, B., et al. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031586 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Bogun, M. M., Bundy, B. N., Goland, R. S., & Greenbaum, C. J. (2020) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc19-2288 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Gale, E. A. M. (2006) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-006-0348-7 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Comparison of screening scores for diabetes and prediabetes
Poltavskiy, E. A., Kim, D. J., & Bang, H. (2016) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2016.06.022 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Wu, L., Tsang, V., Menzies, A. M., Sasson, S. C., Carlino, M. S., Brown, D. A., Clifton-Bligh, R. J., & Gunton, J. E. (2023) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc22-2202 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Current state and future evolution of pancreatic islet transplantation
Anazawa, T., Okajima, H., Masui, T., & Uemoto, S. (2018) · Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery · doi:10.1002/ags3.12214 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Noctor, E., Crowe, C., Carmody, L. A., Saunders, J. A., Kirwan, B., O’Dea, A., Gillespie, P., Glynn, L. G., McGuire, B. E., O’Neill, C., et al. (2016) · European Journal of Endocrinology · doi:10.1530/eje-15-1260 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Glycated Hemoglobin A <sub>1c</sub> as Screening for Diabetes Mellitus in HIV-Infected Individuals
Eckhardt, B. J., Holzman, R. S., Kwan, C. K., Baghdadi, J., & Aberg, J. A. (2012) · AIDS Patient Care and STDs · doi:10.1089/apc.2011.0379 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Factors affecting A1C in non-diabetic individuals: review and meta-analysis
Cavagnolli, G., Pimentel, A. L., Freitas, P. A. C., Gross, J. L., & Camargo, J. L. (2015) · Clinica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.cca.2015.03.024 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
The use of intermediate endpoints in the design of type 1 diabetes prevention trials
the Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet Study Group, & Krischer, J. P. (2013) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-013-2960-7 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Racial/ethnic disparities in diabetes diagnosis and glycemic control among women of reproductive age
Britton, L. E., Hussey, J. M., Crandell, J. L., Berry, D. C., Brooks, J. L., & Bryant, A. G. (2018) · Journal of Women s Health · doi:10.1089/jwh.2017.6845 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
IPEX syndrome: genetics and treatment options
Ben-Skowronek, I. (2021) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes12030323 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Early peri-operative hyperglycaemia and renal allograft rejection in patients withoutdiabetes
Thomas, M. C., Moran, J., Mathew, T. H., Russ, G. R., & Mohan Rao, M. (2000) · BMC Nephrology · doi:10.1186/1471-2369-1-1 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Early Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Screening With Glycated Hemoglobin: A Systematic Review
Kattini, R., Hummelen, R., & Kelly, L. (2020) · Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada · doi:10.1016/j.jogc.2019.12.015 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
First trimester hemoglobin A1c prediction of gestational diabetes
Zhao, B., Kunz, L., Wang, E., Popat, R., Nimbal, V., Palaniappan, L., & Osmundson, S. (2016) · American Journal of Perinatology · doi:10.1055/s-0036-1581055 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Management of chronic pancreatitis
Hines, O. J., & Pandol, S. J. (2024) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2023-070920 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Community-based screening for diabetes in Michigan
Tabaei, B. P., Burke, R., Constance, A., Hare, J., May-Aldrich, G., Parker, S. A., Scott, A., Stys, A., Chickering, J., & Herman, W. H. (2003) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.26.3.668 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Harper, L. M., Mele, L., Landon, M. B., Carpenter, M. W., Ramin, S. M., Reddy, U. M., Casey, B., Wapner, R. J., Varner, M. W., Thorp, J. M., et al. (2016) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000001383 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Searching for maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY): when and what for?
Timsit, J., Saint-Martin, C., Dubois-Laforgue, D., & Bellanné-Chantelot, C. (2016) · Canadian Journal of Diabetes · doi:10.1016/j.jcjd.2015.12.005 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Perreault, L., Pan, Q., Aroda, V. R., Barrett-Connor, E., Dabelea, D., Dagogo-Jack, S., Hamman, R. F., Kahn, S. E., Mather, K. J., Knowler, W. C., et al. (2017) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1111/dme.13453 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Josefson, J. L., Scholtens, D. M., Kuang, A., Catalano, P. M., Lowe, L. P., Dyer, A. R., Petito, L. C., Lowe, W. L., Metzger, B. E., HAPO Follow-up Study Cooperative Research Group, et al. (2021) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc20-2398 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Hemoglobin A1c—Using Epidemiology to Guide Medical Practice: Kelly West Award Lecture 2020
Selvin, E. (2021) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dci21-0035 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Self-citationQuartuccio, M., Hall, E., Singh, V., Makary, M. A., Hirose, K., Desai, N., Walsh, C., Warren, D., Sun, Z., Stein, E., et al. (2017) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2016-2952 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Selvin, E., Rawlings, A. M., Bergenstal, R. M., Coresh, J., & Brancati, F. L. (2013) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc12-2715 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Gilmour, J. A., Sykes, J., Etchells, E., & Tullis, E. (2019) · Canadian Journal of Diabetes · doi:10.1016/j.jcjd.2018.04.008 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Diabetes Care After Transplant
Wallia, A., Illuri, V., & Molitch, M. E. (2016) · Medical Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.mcna.2016.01.005 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
COVID-19 as a trigger for type 1 diabetes
Wang, Y., Guo, H., Wang, G., Zhai, J., & Du, B. (2023) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/clinem/dgad165 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
The Effect of Prior Carbohydrate Intake on the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test
Wilkerson, H. L. C., Butler, F. K., & Francis, J. O. (1960) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/diab.9.5.386 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Saccone, G., Khalifeh, A., Al-Kouatly, H. B., Sendek, K., & Berghella, V. (2020) · The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine · doi:10.1080/14767058.2018.1519543 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Jacobsen, L. M., Larsson, H. E., Tamura, R. N., Vehik, K., Clasen, J., Sosenko, J., Hagopian, W. A., She, J., Steck, A. K., Rewers, M., et al. (2019) · Pediatric Diabetes · doi:10.1111/pedi.12812 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Huvinen, E., Koivusalo, S. B., Meinilä, J. M., Valkama, A., Tiitinen, A. E., Rönö, K., Stach‐Lempinen, B., & Eriksson, J. G. (2018) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2017-02477 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Cresci, B., Cosentino, C., Monami, M., & Mannucci, E. (2020) · Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism · doi:10.1111/dom.14045 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
One-step or 2-step testing for gestational diabetes: which is better?
Coustan, D. R., Dyer, A. R., & Metzger, B. E. (2021) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2021.05.009 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Mañé, L., Flores-Le Roux, J. A., Gómez, N., Chillarón, J. J., Llauradó, G., Gortazar, L., Payà, A., Pedro-Botet, J., & Benaiges, D. (2019) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2019.03.017 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Mainguy, C., Bellon, G., Delaup, V., Ginoux, T., Kassai-Koupai, B., Mazur, S., Rabilloud, M., Remontet, L., & Reix, P. (2017) · Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.1515/jpem-2016-0184 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Reconsidering the age thresholds for type II diabetes screening in the U.S
Chung, S., Azar, K. M. J., Baek, M., Lauderdale, D. S., & Palaniappan, L. P. (2014) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2014.05.012 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Early Pregnancy Diabetes Screening and Diagnosis
Mission, J. F., Catov, J. M., Deihl, T. E., Feghali, M. N., & Scifres, C. (2017) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002277 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Early pregnancy hemoglobin A1C and pregnancy outcomes: a population-based study
Chen, L., Pocobelli, G., Yu, O., Shortreed, S. M., Osmundson, S. S., Fuller, S., Wartko, P. D., Mcculloch, D., Warwick, S., Newton, K. M., et al. (2019) · American Journal of Perinatology · doi:10.1055/s-0038-1675619 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Awa, W. L., Schober, E., Wiegand, S., Herwig, J., Meissner, T., Schmidt, F., Molz, E., & Holl, R. W. (2011) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2011.09.011 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Putman, M. S., Norris, A. W., Hull, R. L., Rickels, M. R., Sussel, L., Blackman, S. M., Chan, C. L., Ode, K. L., Daley, T., Stecenko, A. A., et al. (2023) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc23-0380 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Carbohydrate Intake Prior to Oral Glucose Tolerance Testing
Klein, K. R., Walker, C. P., McFerren, A. L., Huffman, H., Frohlich, F., & Buse, J. B. (2021) · Journal of the Endocrine Society · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvab049 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review
Zhao, Z., Wang, X., Bao, X.-Q., Ning, J., Shang, M., & Zhang, D. (2021) · Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy · doi:10.1007/s00262-020-02699-1 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Economic evaluations of gestational diabetes mellitus screening: a systematic review
Mo, X., Gai Tobe, R., Takahashi, Y., Arata, N., Liabsuetrakul, T., Nakayama, T., & Mori, R. (2021) · Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.2188/jea.je20190338 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Diabetes remission and relapse after bariatric surgery: a nationwide population-based study
Conte, C., Lapeyre-Mestre, M., Hanaire, H., & Ritz, P. (2020) · Obesity Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11695-020-04924-3 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Humphreys, A., Bravis, V., Kaur, A., Walkey, H. C., Godsland, I. F., Misra, S., Johnston, D. G., & Oliver, N. S. (2019) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107789 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Accuracy of a point-of-care hemoglobin A1c assay
Nathan, D. M., Griffin, A., Perez, F. M., Basque, E., Do, L., & Steiner, B. (2019) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/1932296819836101 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Franck Thompson, E., Watson, D., Benoit, C. M., Landvik, S., & McNamara, J. (2020) · Journal of Cystic Fibrosis · doi:10.1016/j.jcf.2019.07.010 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Zhu, Y., Qian, L., Liu, Q., Zou, J., Zhou, Y., Yang, T., Huang, G., Zhou, Z., & Liu, Y. (2020) · Diabetes & Metabolism Journal · doi:10.4093/dmj.2019.0007 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- International Diabetes Federation . IDF Diabetes Atlas, 10th edition. Brussels, Belgium, International Diabetes Federation,2021. Accessed 5 August 2024. Available from https://www.diabetesatlas.org/atlas/tenth-edition/
- 2018, Atypical diabetes: pathophysiology, clinical presentations, and treatment options.
- Pillay, 2021, US Preventative Services Task Force Evidence Syntheses, formerly Systematic Evidence Reviews.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zhou, B., Rayner, A. W., Gregg, E. W., Sheffer, K. E., Carrillo-Larco, R. M., Bennett, J. E., Shaw, J. E., Paciorek, C. J., Singleton, R. K., Barradas Pires, A., et al. (2024) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(24)02317-1 · Cited by 1,013 · see citing works
Cusi, K. J., Abdelmalek, M. F., Apovian, C. M., Balapattabi, K., Bannuru, R. R., Barb, D., Bardsley, J. K., Beverly, E. A., Corbin, K. D., ElSayed, N. A., et al. (2025) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dci24-0094 · Cited by 396 · see citing works
Self-citationWang, S., Du, Y., Zhang, B., Meng, G., Liu, Z., Liew, S. Y., Liang, R., Zhang, Z., Cai, X., Wu, S., et al. (2024) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.09.004 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Deanfield, J. E., Verma, S., Scirica, B. M., Kahn, S. E., Emerson, S. S., Ryan, D. H., Lingvay, I., Colhoun, H. M., Plutzky, J., Kosiborod, M., et al. (2024) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(24)01498-3 · Cited by 302 · see citing works
Self-citationPalaniappan, L. P., Allen, N. B., Almarzooq, Z., Anderson, C. A. M., Arora, P. K., Avery, C. L., Baker-Smith, C. M., Bansal, N., Currie, M. E., Earlie, R. S., et al. (2026) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000001412 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
Coadministered Cagrilintide and Semaglutide in Adults with Overweight or Obesity.
Garvey, W. T., Blüher, M., Osorto Contreras, C. K., Davies, M. J., Winning Lehmann, E., Pietiläinen, K. H., Rubino, D., Sbraccia, P., Wadden, T., Zeuthen, N., et al. (2025) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2502081 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Diabetes in China part 1: epidemiology and risk factors
Xu, Y., Lu, J., Li, M., Wang, T., Wang, K., Cao, Q., Ding, Y., Xiang, Y., Wang, S., Yang, Q., et al. (2024) · The Lancet Public Health · doi:10.1016/s2468-2667(24)00250-0 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Ogle, G. D., Wang, F., Haynes, A., Gregory, G. A., King, T. W., Deng, K., Dabelea, D., James, S., Jenkins, A. J., Li, X., et al. (2025) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112277 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Diabetic Wound Repair: From Mechanism to Therapeutic Opportunities
Wang, R., Gu, S., Kim, Y. H., Lee, A., Lin, H., & Jiang, D. (2025) · MedComm · doi:10.1002/mco2.70406 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Phillip, M., Achenbach, P., Addala, A., Albanese-O’Neill, A., Battelino, T., Bell, K. J., Besser, R. E. J., Bonifacio, E., Colhoun, H. M., Couper, J. J., et al. (2024) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dci24-0042 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Self-citationEarly-onset type 2 diabetes: the next major diabetes transition
Luk, A. O. Y., Wild, S. H., Jones, S., Anjana, R. M., Hivert, M., McCaffrey, J., Gregg, E. W., & Misra, S. (2025) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(25)00830-x · Cited by 85 · see citing works
High Global Prevalence of Steatotic Liver Disease and Associated Subtypes: A Meta-analysis
Ho, G. J. K., Tan, F. X. N., Sasikumar, N. A., Tham, E. K. J., Ko, D., Kim, D. H., Danpanichkul, P., Yu, Z., Xianda, C., Zhang, Z., et al. (2025) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2025.02.006 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Stafford, L. K., Gage, A. D., Xu, Y. Y., Conrad, M., Beltrán, I., Boyko, E. J., Duncan, B. B., Hay, S. I., Lenox, H., Lozano, R., et al. (2025) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(25)00217-7 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Mutruc, V., Bologa, C., Șorodoc, V., Ceasovschih, A., Morărașu, B. C., Șorodoc, L., Catar, O., & Lionte, C. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm14082833 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
“Diagnostic criteria were described by the WHO [56] and the American Diabetes Association (ADA) guidelines [57].”
Ji, C., Jiang, T., Liu, L., Zhang, J., & You, L. (2025) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2025.1571362 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Ndumele, C. E., Rodriguez, F., Dixon, D. L., Khan, S. S., Mukherjee, D., Bajaj, M., Bangalore, S., Bozkurt, B., Breathett, K., Clarke, S. L., et al. (2026) · JACC · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2026.03.056 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Self-citationRanjit Unnikrishnan, I., Shaw, J. E., Chan, J. C. N., Wild, S. H., Peters, A. L., Orrange, S. E., Roden, M., & Mohan, V. (2025) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-025-00635-0 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
“However, the different cut-off values of HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose and 2-h OGTT plasma glucose levels have different discriminatory and prognostic values that vary between populations 2 .”
Ndumele, C. E., Rodríguez, F., Dixon, D. L., Khan, S. S., Mukherjee, D., Bajaj, M. S., Bangalore, S., Bozkurt, B., Breathett, K. K., Clarke, S. L., et al. (2026) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000001453 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Self-citationHuang, Q., Qadri, S. U., Bian, H., Yi, X., Lin, C., Yang, X., Xiaopeng, Z., Lin, H., Yan, H., Chang, X., et al. (2024) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2024.10.015 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
The future of type 1 diabetes therapy
Ziegler, A.-G., Cengiz, E., & Kay, T. W. H. (2025) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(25)01438-2 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Decoding the immune dance: Unraveling the interplay between beta cells and type 1 diabetes
Roy, S., Pokharel, P., & Piganelli, J. D. (2024) · Molecular Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.molmet.2024.101998 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Intermittent fasting triggers interorgan communication to suppress hair follicle regeneration
Chen, H., Liu, C., Cui, S., Xia, Y., Zhang, K., Cheng, H., Peng, J., Yu, X., Li, L., Yu, H., et al. (2024) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.11.004 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
A comprehensive review of non-invasive optical and microwave biosensors for glucose monitoring
Martins, A. J. L., Velásquez, R., Gaillac, D. B., dos Santos, V. N., Tami, D., Souza, R. N. P., Osorio, F. C., Fogli, G. A., Soares, B. S., do Rego, C. G., et al. (2024) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/j.bios.2024.117081 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
The pathophysiology, presentation and classification of Type 1 diabetes
Aamodt, K. I., & Powers, A. C. (2025) · Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism · doi:10.1111/dom.16628 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“…clinical tools can be utilized for the classification and phenotypic characterization of individual patients, guiding clinical decision-making (see 4,91,104 Some of these classic phenotypic features, including age, body mass index, and race, have even been shown to predict autoantibody positivity…”
Huang, D. Q., Wilson, L., Behling, C. A., Amangurbanova, M., Kleiner, D. E., Kowdley, K. V., Dasarathy, S., Terrault, N. A., Diehl, A. M., Chalasani, N., et al. (2024) · Hepatology · doi:10.1097/hep.0000000000001015 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
What Is Gestational Diabetes—Really?
Buchanan, T. A., Xiang, A. H., Page, K. A., & Watanabe, R. M. (2025) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/dbi24-0041 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Diabetes mellitus and the key role of endoplasmic reticulum stress in pancreatic β cells
Lytrivi, M., Tong, Y. A., Virgilio, E., Yi, X., & Cnop, M. (2025) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/s41574-025-01129-5 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“T1DM and T2DM are polygenic, heterogeneous diseases with a variable presentation and progression 2 .”
Risk of Pancreatic Cancer in Glycemically Defined New-Onset Diabetes: A Prospective Cohort Study
Chari, S. T., Wu, B. U., Lopez, C., Lustigova, E., Chen, Q., Eeden, S. K. V. D., Leimpeter, A. D., Fisher, W., Wood, A., Alexander, A. S., et al. (2025) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2025.06.025 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Walicka, M., Krysiński, A., Rosa, G. R. M. L., Sun, A., Campagna, D., Ciaula, A. D., Dugal, T., Kengne, A. P., Dinh, P. L., Misra, A., et al. (2024) · Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome Clinical Research & Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.dsx.2024.103044 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Leichter, S. B., Felton, J. L., Rasmussen, C. G., Rizzuto, P., Bellini, N. J., Ebekozien, O. A., & Schulman‐Rosenbaum, R. (2025) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/clinem/dgaf194 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Self-citationLee, H., Schwamm, L. H., Sansing, L. H., Kamel, H., de Havenon, A., Turner, A. C., Sheth, K. N., Krishnaswamy, S., Brandt, C., Zhao, H., et al. (2024) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-024-01120-w · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Wang, T., Zhang, M., Shi, W., Li, Y., Zhang, T., & Shi, W. (2025) · Cardiovascular Diabetology · doi:10.1186/s12933-025-02653-4 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“The diagnosis of diabetes was meeting any of the following items: self-reported doctor-diagnosed diabetes, and/or FBG ≥ 7.0 mmol/L, and/or random plasma glucose ≥ 11.1 mmol/L, and/or HbA1c ≥ 6.5% according to the recommendations of the American Diabetes Association [35, 36].”
InfluentialType 1 diabetes presenting in adults: Trends, diagnostic challenges and unique features
Evans‐Molina, C., & Oram, R. A. (2025) · Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism · doi:10.1111/dom.16402 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Cardiovascular, kidney, and metabolic health: an actionable vision for heart failure prevention
Ostrominski, J. W., CHENG, A. Y. Y., Nelson, A. J., Neuen, B. L., Sattar, N. A., Tuttle, K. R., & Vaduganathan, M. (2025) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(25)01384-4 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Jacobsen, L. M., & Schatz, D. (2026) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2026.0048 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Health economic considerations of screening for early type 1 diabetes
Rewers, M. (2025) · Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism · doi:10.1111/dom.16522 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Templeman, E. L., Ferrat, L. A., Thomas, N. J. M., Speake, C., Wherrett, D. K., Sherr, J. L., Wentworth, J. M., REDONDO, M. J., Parik, H. M., Felton, J. L., et al. (2025) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc25-0192 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
The Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring to Diagnose Stage 2 Type 1 Diabetes
Mader, J. K., Wong, J. C., Freckmann, G., Garcia‐Tirado, J., Hirsch, I. B., Johnson, S. B., Kerr, D. E., Kim, S. H., Lal, R., Montaser, E., et al. (2025) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/19322968251333441 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citationTeufel, F., Ogurtsova, K., Genitsaridi, I., Carrillo-Larco, R. M., Varghese, J. S., Marcus, M. E., Sacre, J. W., Sajjadi, S. F., Chiwanga, F. S., Manne‐Goehler, J., et al. (2026) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc25-2583 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Diagnosis and Treatment of Hyperglycemia in Pregnancy
Mohan, S., & Egan, A. M. (2024) · Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.ecl.2024.05.011 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Fleseriu, M., Pivonello, R., Newell-Price, J., Gadelha, M. R., Biller, B., Auchus, R., Feelders, R., Shimatsu, A., Witek, P., Bex, M., et al. (2025) · Pituitary · doi:10.1007/s11102-024-01471-3 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Muszalska, A., Wiecanowska, J., Michałowska, J., Pastusiak, K., Polok, I., Łompieś, K., & Bogdański, P. (2025) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu17050862 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“Diabetes may also be diagnosed on the basis of a random plasma glucose level equal or higher than 200 mg/dL in individuals presenting classical symptoms of hyperglycemia or a hyperglycemic crisis [47,48].”
Xie, X., Wu, C., Dao, F., Deng, K., Yan, D., Huang, J., Lyu, H., & Lin, H. (2025) · iMeta · doi:10.1002/imt2.70060 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
“Patients often transition through a pre ‐ diabetic (preT2D) phase marked by elevated blood glucose levels below diabetic thresholds [3, 4] and reduced glucose ‐ stimulated insulin secretion from beta cells [5, 6].”
Preoperative Hemoglobin A 1C , Glycemic Status, and Postoperative Outcomes in General Surgery
Schaschinger, T., Niederegger, T., Brandt, J., Knoedler, S. A., Knoedler, L., Matar, D. Y., Alobuia, W. M., Perottino, G. M., Poultsides, G. A., Sabagh, M., et al. (2025) · JAMA Surgery · doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2025.4706 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Davoodian, N., Lotfaliany, M., Huxley, R., Lee, C., Pasco, J. A., Adams, R., Azizi, F., Bertoni, A. G., Björkelund, C., Colagiuri, S., et al. (2025) · The Lancet Global Health · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(25)00237-2 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Drotar, D. M., Ramos, G. J. A. V., Williams, M. D., David, S. T., Luce, C., Smith, J. A., Posgai, A. L., Bacher, R. L., Campbell‐Thompson, M., Kusmartseva, I., et al. (2025) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/db25-0326 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Mallone, R., Bismuth, É., Thivolet, C. H., Benhamou, P., Hoffmeister, N., Collet, F., Nicolino, M. P., Reynaud, R., & Beltrand, J. (2024) · Diabetes & Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.diabet.2024.101603 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Song, K., Kwon, Y., Lee, E., Lee, H. S., Youn, Y. H., Baik, S. J., Shin, H. J., & Chae, H. W. (2025) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2025.06.011 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Steven, S., Kuntić, M., Münzel, T. F., & Daiber, A. (2025) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.pharmr.2025.100082 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Lin, Y., Zhang, Z., Zhong, J.-Q., Wang, Z., Peng, Y.-T., Lin, Y.-M., Zhang, H.-P., & Tian, J.-Q. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0302155 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Agbaje, A. O. (2025) · Obesity and Endocrinology · doi:10.1093/obendo/wjaf002 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Rodacki, M., Zajdenverg, L., Júnior, W. S. D. S., Giacaglia, L. R., Negrato, C. A., Cobas, R. A., de Almeida-Pititto, B., & Bertoluci, M. C. (2025) · Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome · doi:10.1186/s13098-024-01572-w · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Evolving nutrition therapy in cystic fibrosis: Adapting to the CFTR modulator era
Vavrina, K., Griffin, T. B., Jones, A. M., Schindler, T., Bui, T. N., & Sankararaman, S. (2025) · Nutrition in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1002/ncp.11332 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Zelber‐Sagi, S., Paik, J. M., Wajcman, D. I., Henry, L. L., Yilmaz, Y. N., Alqahtani, S. A., El‐Kassas, M., Pekas, E. J., Gerber, L. H., & Younossi, Z. M. (2025) · Liver International · doi:10.1111/liv.70226 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“T2D and PreD were defined using the American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria [40].”
Self-citationGiannakogeorgou, A., Roden, M., & Pafili, K. (2025) · HORMONES · doi:10.1007/s42000-025-00701-y · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Polu, P. R., Mishra, S., Gupta, J., Vyas, M., & Babu, M. R. (2025) · Inflammopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s10787-025-01996-4 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA’s current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care (Zhu 2025a).”
Succurro, E., Vizza, P., Cicone, F., Rubino, M., Fiorentino, T. V., Perticone, M., Mannino, G. C., Sciacqua, A., Guzzi, P. H., Veltri, P., et al. (2024) · Cardiovascular Diabetology · doi:10.1186/s12933-024-02513-7 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Hyperglycaemia in pregnancy: the role of ethnicity and geography in risk and outcomes
Yuen, L., Hannah, W., Hare, M. J. L., & Simmons, D. S. (2025) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-025-06510-7 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“The WHO and ADA classify pregnant women without pre-existing diabetes but fulfilling non-pregnant diabetes diagnostic criteria as having either ‘diabetes in pregnancy’ [5] or ‘diabetes complicating preg-nancy’ [6] respectively.”
Sex Differences in MASLD After Age 50: Presentation, Diagnosis, and Clinical Implications
Milani, I., Parrotta, M. E., Colangeli, L., Chinucci, M., Palleschi, S., Rossi, B., Sbraccia, P., Mantovani, A., Leonetti, F., Guglielmi, V., et al. (2025) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines13092292 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“T2D was defined as fasting plasma glucose ≥ 126 mg/dL, 2-h plasma glucose ≥ 200 mg/dL after a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test, HbA1c ≥ 6.5%, clinical diagnosis by a clinician, and/or use of antidiabetic medication [47].”
InfluentialHeyborne, K., & Barbour, L. A. (2024) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000005777 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Li, N., Liu, K., Zhang, Y., et al. (2025) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.142480 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
A narrative review of metformin in pregnancy: Navigating benefit and uncertainty
McEvoy, R. P., Newman, C., Egan, A. M., & Dunne, F. (2025) · Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism · doi:10.1111/dom.16361 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Edelman, S. V., Agardh, D., Cui, N., Hao, L., Wieloch, M., & Meneghini, L. (2025) · Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism · doi:10.1111/dom.16454 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Impact of Exercise Training in Patients with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: An Umbrella Review
Gracia‐Sánchez, A., López‐Pineda, A., Nouni-García, R., Zúnica‐García, S., Chicharro‐Luna, E., & Gil-Guillén, V. F. (2025) · Sports Medicine - Open · doi:10.1186/s40798-025-00863-4 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA), it is classified into type 1 (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes (T2DM) [1].”
Placental mitochondrial impairment and its association with maternal metabolic dysfunction
Grismaldo, A., Luévano‐Martínez, L. A., Reyes, M., García-Márquez, G. G., García‐Rivas, G., & Sobrevía, L. (2024) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jp285935 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Ruseva, A., Dabbous, F. M., Ding, N., Fabricatore, A. N., Huse, S., Michalak, W., Nordstrom, B. L., Hartaigh, B. Ó., Zhao, Z., & Umashanker, D. (2025) · Postgraduate Medicine · doi:10.1080/00325481.2025.2482274 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Agarwal, S., Varghese, R. T., SAVIAN, R. E. N. A. T. O. R. E. Z. E. N. D. E., Wang, C. C. L., & Galindo, R. J. (2025) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.1016/j.eprac.2025.05.749 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Adipocentric Strategy for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Martínez, J. J. G. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm14030678 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Romo-Romo, A., Sánchez‐Tapia, M., López-Carrasco, M. G., Guillén-Pineda, L. E., Brito-Córdova, G. X., Martagón, A. J., Granados‐Portillo, O., Walther, G., Gomez-Perez, F. J., Aguilar-Salinas, C. A., et al. (2025) · Clinical Nutrition ESPEN · doi:10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.08.029 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Wu, Y., Mao, M., Huang, H., Huang, C., & Liao, W. (2025) · Journal of Diabetes Investigation · doi:10.1111/jdi.70185 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“…(2) individuals aged 45 years or older diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus based on the American Diabetes Association (ADA) diagnostic criteria 30 , (3) well-de fi ned risk factors for sarcopenia, with diagnostic parameters derived from established literature and guidelines from recognized…”
Lindley, K. J., Bello, N. A., Berlacher, K. L., Hameed, A. B., Lane, A. D., Mahmoud, Z., Malhamé, I., Miller, E. C., Parikh, P., & Youmans, A. (2026) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2025.11.001 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Vara-Luiz, F., Mendes, I., Palma, C., et al. (2025) · Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology · doi:10.1177/17562848251343416 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Shen, J., Wang, W., Chen, L., et al. (2025) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2025.07.032 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Ethnic diversity in precision medicine: a reality or an aspiration?
Misra, S. (2025) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-025-06513-4 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Karaevren, T. T., Çakmak, R. Y., Cerit, M. N., et al. (2025) · Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome · doi:10.1186/s13098-025-01663-2 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a complex and widespread metabolic disease, characterized by chronic hyperglycemia due to insulin resistance and/or inadequate insulin secretion [1].”
He, Y., Mi, N., Cheng, Z., Xue, H., Han, J., Wang, H., Wang, H. H., Wu, J., Shi, X., Zhao, S., et al. (2025) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(25)00196-2 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Management of Peripheral Artery Disease in Adults With Diabetes: 2025 ACC Scientific Statement
Das, S. R., Bonaca, M. P., Creager, M. A., Maruthur, N. M., Nordanstig, J., Pop‐Busui, R., & Ujueta, F. (2025) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2025.11.027 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Liu, Q., Qin, L., Liang, Y., Xu, M., Zhang, J., Mo, X., Tang, X., Lu, Y., Wang, X., Cao, J., et al. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33044 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic (CKM) Syndrome: A Case-Based Narrative Review
Javaid, A., Hariri, E. H., Özkan, B., Lang, K., Khan, S. S., Rangaswami, J., Stone, N. J., Blumenthal, R. S., & Ndumele, C. E. (2025) · American Journal of Medicine Open · doi:10.1016/j.ajmo.2025.100089 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Zhang, J., Cao, Q., Mao, C., Xu, J., Li, Y., Mu, Y., Huang, G., Chen, D., Deng, X., Xu, T., et al. (2025) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-025-07442-1 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Mitochondrial-encoded peptide MOTS-c prevents pancreatic islet cell senescence to delay diabetes
Kong, B. S., Lee, H., L’Yi, S., Hong, S., & Cho, Y. M. (2025) · Experimental & Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1038/s12276-025-01521-1 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Psychological Impact of Screening for Risk of Type 1 Diabetes: an Update
Johnson, S. B., O’Donnell, H. K., SMITH, L. B., et al. (2025) · Current Diabetes Reports · doi:10.1007/s11892-025-01612-3 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“Currently, the United States Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) does not recommend general population screening for IA and the ADA recommends IA screening only for first-degree relatives of individuals with the disease (FDRs) [12].”
Zhang, Q., Guo, Y., Zhang, H., Xu, W., & Yin, L. (2025) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2025.1702669 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Long-Term Cardiometabolic Outcomes in Children With Metabolically Healthy and Unhealthy Obesity
Putri, R. R., Danielsson, P., Hagman, E., & Marcus, C. (2026) · Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2026.0343 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Kreutz, R. H., Canbay, A., Haluzı́k, M., Januszewicz, A., Mendive, J. M., Sarafidis, P. A., & Schattenberg, J. M. (2026) · European Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2026.106902 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Bolchis, V., Alexa, I., Toderas, N. A., Dumitrescu, R., Sava-Roşianu, R., Bălean, O., Alexa, V. T., Popescu, S. D., Jumanca, D. E., Găluşcan, A., et al. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm14020450 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“These thresholds are crucial for understanding glycemic control and provide essential context for analyzing diabetes-related data [2,3].”
Type 5 Diabetes Mellitus: Global Recognition of a Previously Overlooked Subtype
Selim, S. (2025) · Bangladesh Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.4103/bjem.bjem_13_25 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Current approach to early gestational diabetes mellitus: A clinical update
Goyal, A., & Gupta, Y. (2025) · Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome Clinical Research & Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.dsx.2025.103256 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Yalçın, S. E., Özler, M. R., Yalçın, Y., Sağlam, E., Yılmaz, E. B. S., & Nerez, N. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm14196834 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“…or type 2 diabetes before conception, confirmed Via medical records or pre-pregnancy laboratory documentation, according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) diagnostic criteria [16]: Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM): characterized by autoimmune β -cell destruction and absolute insulin deficiency.”
Mkhize, S. A. L., Phoswa, W. N., Ngubane, P. S., & Mokgalaboni, K. (2025) · Metabolism Open · doi:10.1016/j.metop.2025.100407 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“According to the American Diabetes Association, prediabetes is defined as fasting blood glucose (FBG) levels ranging between 100 and 125 mg/dL or glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) of 5.7 – 6.4 %, whereas in diabetes (DM), FBG and HbA1c are greater than 126 mg/dL and 6.5 % respectively [6].”
InfluentialBairaktari, M., Konstantopoulou, S. M., Malisova, O., Gioxari, A., Stratakos, A. C., Panoutsopoulos, G. I., & Argyri, K. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app152111596 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Risk Factors and Mechanisms for Diabetes in Pancreatitis
Villasmil, M. G. P., & Bellin, M. D. (2024) · Gastroenterology Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.gtc.2024.08.002 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Gera, S., Rearson, A., Baker, G., Douvas, J. L., Alicea-Trelles, N., Gallop, R., Meighan, S. S., & Marks, B. E. (2025) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/clinem/dgaf006 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Zhao, J., Huang, D., Hua, S., et al. (2025) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112033 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Use of technology in prediabetes and precision prevention
He, J., Chu, N. H. S., Wan, H., Ling, J., Xue, Y., Leung, K. H. T., Yang, A., Shen, J., & Chow, E. (2025) · Journal of Diabetes Investigation · doi:10.1111/jdi.70057 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Prediabetes: Roles, Evidence, and Gaps
Zahalka, S. J., Aktürk, H. K., Galindo, R. J., Shah, V. N., & Wang, C. C. L. (2025) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.1016/j.eprac.2025.05.742 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Call for Standardization of C-Peptide Measurement
Schleicher, E. D., Kabytaev, K., Nauck, M., Müller‐Wieland, D., Peter, A., Little, R. R., & Heinemann, L. (2025) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/19322968251362848 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Fatica, M., Ferrigno, S., Cela, E., D’Antonio, A., Conigliaro, P., Cardellini, M., Longo, S., Federici, M., & Chimenti, M. S. (2025) · Acta Diabetologica · doi:10.1007/s00592-025-02565-5 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“However, such evaluation should not be assessed in isolation, but rather as integral compo - nents of a comprehensive cardiometabolic risk monitoring glucose tolerance test (OGTT), and determination of hemo - globin A1c (HbA1c) [ 59 , 60 ].”
Impaired mitochondrial ketone body oxidation in insulin resistant states
Zweck, E., Piel, S., Schmidt, J. W., Scheiber, D., Schön, M., KAHL, S., Burkart, V., Dewidar, B., Remus, R., Chadt, A., et al. (2025) · EBioMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2025.106007 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Definition, Klassifikation, Diagnostik und Differenzialdiagnostik des Diabetes mellitus: Update 2024
Schwarz, T., Niederau, C. M., Pleus, S., Tytko, A., Landgraf, R., Werner, C., Müller‐Wieland, D., Müller, U., Freckmann, G., Schleicher, E. D., et al. (2024) · Diabetologie und Stoffwechsel · doi:10.1055/a-2312-0252 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, ElSayed, N. A., McCoy, R. G., Aleppo, G., Balapattabi, K., Beverly, E. A., Briggs Early, K., Bruemmer, D., Ebekozien, O., Echouffo-Tcheugui, J. B., Ekhlaspour, L., Gaglia, J. L., Garg, R., Khunti, K., Lal, R., Lingvay, I., Matfin, G., Pandya, N., Pekas, E. J., Pilla, S. J., Polsky, S., Segal, A. R., Seley, J. J., Selvin, E., Stanton, R. C., & Bannuru, R. R.
- ORCID
- ElSayed, Nuha A.
- McCoy, Rozalina G.
- Aleppo, Grazia
- Balapattabi, Kirthikaa
- Beverly, Elizabeth A.
- Briggs Early, Kathaleen
- Bruemmer, Dennis
- Ebekozien, Osagie
- Echouffo-Tcheugui, Justin B.
- Ekhlaspour, Laya
- Gaglia, Jason L.
- Garg, Rajesh
- Khunti, Kamlesh
- Lal, Rayhan
- Lingvay, Ildiko
- Pandya, Naushira
- Pekas, Elizabeth J.
- Pilla, Scott J.
- Polsky, Sarit
- Segal, Alissa R.
- Seley, Jane Jeffrie
- Selvin, Elizabeth
- Stanton, Robert C.
- Bannuru, Raveendhara R.
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2024-12-09
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- Supplement_1
- Pages
- S27-S49
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- PMC
- PMC11635041
- OpenAlex
- W4405187673
- Semantic Scholar
- 60a7bbd727d3367037042a9d3e94773b95b7ff09
- Cited by
- 1,393
- References
- 213
- Citations by year
- 2026: 716 · 2025: 608 · 2024: 69
- FWCI
- 81.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K23DK121942)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- diabetes diagnosis, diabetes classification, diabetes mellitus, clinical guidelines, quality of care, treatment goals
- MeSH terms
- Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Standard of Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-14.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-14.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review