Cited by 119Diabetes and associated disordersDiabetes Management and ResearchPancreatic function and diabetes

No Effect of the Altered Peptide Ligand NBI-6024 on β-Cell Residual Function and Insulin Needs in New-Onset Type 1 Diabetes

Open access
Walter, Markus, Philotheou, Areti, Bonnici, François, Ziegler, Anette-G., Jimenez, Roland, on behalf of the NBI-6024 Study Group·2009·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This randomized, four-arm, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging phase 2 trial was conducted to determine whether repeated subcutaneous injections of the altered peptide ligand, NBI-6024, designed to inhibit autoreactive T-cells, improves β-cell function in patients with recently diagnosed type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 188 patients, aged 10–35 years, with recently diagnosed type 1 diabetes were randomly assigned for a treatment consisting of the subcutaneous administration of placebo or 1, 0.5, or 0.1 mg NBI-6024 at baseline, weeks 2 and 4, and then monthly until month 24. Fasting, peak, and area under the curve (AUC) C-peptide concentrations during a 2-h mixed-meal tolerance test were measured at 3-month intervals during treatment. Immune function parameters (islet antibodies and CD4 and CD8 T-cells) were also studied. RESULTS: The mean peak C-peptide concentration at 24 months after study entry showed no significant difference between the groups treated with 0.1 mg (0.59 pmol/ml), 0.5 mg (0.57 pmol/ml), and 1.0 mg NBI-6024 (0.48 pmol/ml) and the placebo group (0.54 pmol/ml). Fasting, stimulated peak, and AUC C-peptide concentrations declined linearly in all groups by ∼60% over the 24-month treatment period. The average daily insulin needs at month 24 were also comparable between the four groups. No treatment-related changes in islet antibodies and T cell numbers were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with altered peptide ligand NBI-6024 at repeated doses of 0.1, 0.5, or 1.0 mg did not improve or maintain β-cell function.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc09-0449

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • After promising phase 1-2 trials in patients with recent-onset type 1 diabetes and detectable endogenous insulin production, phase 3 trials of anti-CD3 antibodies (otelixizumab and teplizumab), and the Diamyd vaccine (GAD-alum immunotherapy) did not meet primary endpoints.

    “Disappointingly, after promising phase 1–2 trials in patients with recent-onset type 1 diabetes and detectable endogenous insulin production, phase 3 trials of anti-CD3 antibodies (otelixizumab and teplizumab), and the Diamyd vaccine (GAD-alum immunotherapy) did not meet primary endpoints.135–141”

    From Type 1 diabetes (2014) · cites this paper as [135]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. [1]Eisenbarth GS: Type 1 diabetes mellitus: a chronic autoimmune disease. N Engl J Med 1986; 314: 1360– 1368 3517648
  2. [2]Roep BO Atkinson MA van Endert PM Gottlieb PA Wilson SB Sachs JA: Autoreactive T cell responses in insulin-dependent (type 1) diabetes mellitus. J Autoimmun 1999; 13: 267– 282 10479395
  3. [3]Lejon K Fathman CG: Isolation of self antigen-reactive cells from inflamed islets of nonobese diabetic mice using CD4 high expression as a marker. J Immunol 1999; 163: 5708– 5714 10553102
  4. [4]Stiller CR Dupre J Gent M Jenner MR Keown PA Laupacis A Martell R Rodger NW von Graffenried B Wolfe BM: Effects of cyclosporine immunosuppression in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus of recent onset. Science 1984; 223: 1362– 1367 6367043
  5. [5]Wegmann DR Gill RG Norbury-Glaser M Schloot N Daniel D: Analysis of the spontaneous T cell response to insulin in NOD mice. J Autoimmun 1994; 7: 833– 843 7888039
  6. [6]Alleva DG Gaur A Jin L Wegmann D Gottlieb PA Pahuja A Johnson EB Motheral T Putnam A Crowe PD Ling N Boehme SA Conlon PJ: Immunological characterization and therapeutic activity of an altered-peptide ligand, NBI-6024, based on the immunodominant type 1 diabetes autoantigen insulin B-chain (9-23) peptide. Diabetes 2002; 51: 2126– 2134 12086942
  7. [7]Giannoukakis N: NBI-6024 (Neurocrine Biosciences). IDrugs 2002; 5: 1162– 1167 12800057
  8. [8]Alleva DG Maki RA Putnam AL Robinson JM Kipnes MS Dandona P Marks JB Simmons DL Greenbaum CJ Jimenez RG Conlon PJ Gottlieb PA: Immunomodulation in type 1 diabetes by NBI-6024, an altered peptide ligand of the insulin B epitope. Scand J Immunol 2006; 63: 59– 69 16398702
  9. [10]Keymeulen B Vandemeulebroucke E Ziegler AG Mathieu C Kaufman L Hale G Gorus F Goldman M Walter M Candon S Schandene L Crenier L De Block C Seigneurin JM De Pauw P Pierard D Weets I Rebello P Bird P Berrie E Frewin M Waldmann H Bach JF Pipeleers D Chatenoud L: Insulin needs after CD3-antibody therapy in new-onset type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 2598– 2608 15972866

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walter, M., Philotheou, A., Bonnici, F., Ziegler, A.-G., Jimenez, R., & on behalf of the NBI-6024 Study Group
Affiliations
  • Diabetes Research Institute, Forschergruppe Diabetes e.V., Munich, Germany;
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • Diabetes Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa, and
  • Neurocrine Biosciences (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Ziegler, Anette-G.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2009-08-18
Volume
32
Issue
11
Pages
2036-2040
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2171429103
Cited by
119
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
FWCI
6.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) (submittedVersion)
  • Site cant be reached (submittedVersion)
Funders
Neurocrine Biosciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
Keywords
altered peptide ligands, type 1 diabetes, beta-cell function, residual beta-cell function, C-peptide, insulin requirement, CD4 and CD8 T cells, subcutaneous immunotherapy, dose-ranging
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, C-Peptide, Child, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Electrocardiography, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Male, Middle Aged, Peptide Fragments, Placebos, CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes, CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Patient Selection, Insulin-Secreting Cells, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review