The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diabetes Trends Among Delivery Hospitalizations in the U.S., 1994–2004
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine trends in the prevalence of diabetes among delivery hospitalizations in the U.S. and to describe the characteristics of these hospitalizations. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Hospital discharge data from 1994 through 2004 were obtained from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Diagnosis codes were selected for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, and unspecified diabetes. Rates of delivery hospitalization with diabetes were calculated per 100 deliveries. RESULTS: Overall, an estimated 1,863,746 hospital delivery discharges contained a diabetes diagnosis, corresponding to a rate of 4.3 per 100 deliveries over the 11-year period. GDM accounted for the largest proportion of delivery hospitalizations with diabetes (84.7%), followed by type 1 (7%), type 2 (4.7%), and unspecified diabetes (3.6%). From 1994 to 2004, the rates for all diabetes, GDM, type 1 diabetes, and type 2 diabetes significantly increased overall and within each age-group (15–24, 25–34, and ≥35 years) (P < 0.05). The largest percent increase for all ages was among type 2 diabetes (367%). By age-group, the greatest percent increases for each diabetes type were among the two younger groups. Significant predictors of diabetes at delivery included age ≥35 years vs. 15–24 years (odds ratio 4.80 [95% CI 4.72–4.89]), urban versus rural location (1.14 [1.11–1.17]), and Medicaid/Medicare versus other payment sources (1.29 [1.26–1.32]). CONCLUSIONS: Given the increasing prevalence of diabetes among delivery hospitalizations, particularly among younger women, it will be important to monitor trends in the pregnant population and target strategies to minimize risk for maternal/fetal complications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Criteria for screening tests for gestational diabetes
Carpenter, M. W., & Coustan, D. R. (1982) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0002-9378(82)90349-0 · Cited by 1,924
Lawrence, J. M., Contreras, R., Chen, W., & Sacks, D. A. (2008) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc07-2345 · Cited by 658
Schaefer-Graf, U. M., Buchanan, T. A., Xiang, A., Songster, G., Montoro, M., & Kjos, S. L. (2000) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(00)70217-1 · Cited by 270
Cited by
Preconceptional and maternal obesity: epidemiology and health consequences
Poston, L., Caleyachetty, R., Cnattingius, S., Corvalán, C., Uauy, R., Herring, S., & Gillman, M. W. (2016) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(16)30217-0 · Cited by 1,111
Wearables and the Medical Revolution
Dunn, J., Runge, R., & Snyder, M. (2018) · Personalized Medicine · doi:10.2217/pme-2018-0044 · Cited by 654
DeSisto, C. L., Kim, S. Y., & Sharma, A. J. (2014) · Preventing Chronic Disease · doi:10.5888/pcd11.130415 · Cited by 577
Physical Activity Before and During Pregnancy and Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
Tobias, D. K., Zhang, C., van Dam, R. M., Bowers, K., & Hu, F. B. (2011) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc10-1368 · Cited by 429
Feig, D. S., Hwee, J., Shah, B. R., Booth, G. L., Bierman, A. S., & Lipscombe, L. L. (2014) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc13-2717 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Albrecht, S. S., Kuklina, E. V., Bansil, P., Jamieson, D. J., Whiteman, M. K., Kourtis, A. P., Posner, S. F., & Callaghan, W. M.
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2010-01-12
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 768-773
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2048772986
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 18.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diabetes Trends Among Delivery Hospitalizations in the U.S., 1994–2004. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/dc09-1801
- The paper
- Albrecht, S. S., Kuklina, E. V., Bansil, P., Jamieson, D. J., Whiteman, M. K., Kourtis, A. P., Posner, S. F., & Callaghan, W. M. (2010). Diabetes Trends Among Delivery Hospitalizations in the U.S., 1994–2004. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc09-1801
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.