Trends in incidence of diabetes in pregnancy and serious perinatal outcomes: a large, population-based study in Ontario, Canada, 1996-2010
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: Women with diabetes in pregnancy have high rates of pregnancy complications. Our aims were to explore trends in the incidence of diabetes in pregnancy and examine whether the risk of serious perinatal outcomes has changed. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a population-based cohort study of 1,109,605 women who delivered in Ontario, Canada, between 1 April 1996 and 31 March 2010. We categorized women as gestational diabetes (GDM) (n = 45,384), pregestational diabetes (pre-GDM) (n = 13,278), or no diabetes (n = 1,050,943). The annual age-adjusted rates of diabetes in pregnancy were calculated, and rates of serious perinatal outcomes were compared between groups and by year using Poisson regression. RESULTS: The age-adjusted rate of both GDM (2.7-5.6%, P < 0.001) and pre-GDM (0.7-1.5%, P < 0.001) doubled from 1996 to 2010. The rate of congenital anomalies declined by 23%, whereas the rate of perinatal mortality did not change significantly. However, compared with women with no diabetes, women with pre-GDM and GDM faced an increased risk of congenital anomalies (relative risk 1.86 [95% CI 1.49-2.33] and 1.26 [1.09-1.45], respectively), and perinatal mortality remained elevated in women with pre-GDM (2.33 [1.59-3.43]). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of both GDM and pre-GDM in pregnancy has doubled over the last 14 years, and the overall burden of diabetes in pregnancy on society is growing. Although congenital anomaly rates have declined in women with diabetes, perinatal mortality rates remain unchanged, and the risk of both remains significantly elevated compared with nondiabetic women. Increased efforts are needed to reduce these adverse outcomes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The ongoing epidemic of obesity and diabetes has led to more type 2 diabetes in people of reproductive age, with an increase in pregnant individuals with undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in early pregnancy.
“The ongoing epidemic of obesity and diabetes has led to more type 2 diabetes in people of reproductive age, with an increase in the number of pregnant individuals with undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in early pregnancy (179 -181).”
From 2. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes: <i>Standards of Care in Diabetes—2024</i> (2024) · cites this paper as [179]
The ongoing epidemic of obesity and diabetes has led to more type 2 diabetes in people of reproductive age, with an increase in the number of pregnant individuals with undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in early pregnancy.
“The ongoing epidemic of obesity and diabetes has led to more type 2 diabetes in people of reproductive age, with an increase in the number of pregnant individuals with undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in early pregnancy (164-166).”
From 2. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes: standards of care in diabetes-2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [164]
Gestational diabetes mellitus is associated with increased risk of preterm delivery.
“and increased risk of preterm delivery [65,66,67,68,69].”
From Recent Experimental Studies of Maternal Obesity, Diabetes during Pregnancy and the Developmental Origins of Cardiovascular Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [69]
Gestational diabetes mellitus is associated with greater incidence of large-for-gestational-age infants, fetal adiposity and macrosomia.
“GDM is associated with greater incidence of large-for-gestational-age infants, fetal adiposity and macrosomia”
From Recent Experimental Studies of Maternal Obesity, Diabetes during Pregnancy and the Developmental Origins of Cardiovascular Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [69]
Gestational diabetes mellitus is associated with neonatal hyperinsulinemia and shoulder dystocia.
“neonatal hyperinsulinemia and shoulder dystocia”
From Recent Experimental Studies of Maternal Obesity, Diabetes during Pregnancy and the Developmental Origins of Cardiovascular Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [69]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 33 · Cited by 346
- Authors
- Feig, D. S., Hwee, J., Shah, B. R., Booth, G. L., Bierman, A. S., & Lipscombe, L. L.
- Affiliations
- Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (CA)
- Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
- St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Feig, Denice S.
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2014-05-10
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1590-1596
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2031038320
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 20.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Diabetes Care (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Keywords
- diabetes in pregnancy, gestational diabetes mellitus, pregestational diabetes, incidence trends, congenital malformations, perinatal mortality, pregnancy complications, Ontario
- MeSH terms
- Congenital Abnormalities, Adolescent, Adult, Canada, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Middle Aged, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Pregnancy Outcome, Cohort Studies, Incidence, Case-Control Studies, Diabetes, Gestational, Perinatal Mortality, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review