Cited by 44Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Dose-response effects of insulin glargine in type 2 diabetes

Open access
Wang, Zhihui, Hedrington, Maka S., Gogitidze Joy, Nino, Briscoe, Vanessa J., Richardson, M. Antoinette, Younk, Lisa, Nicholson, Wendell, Tate, Donna B. +1 more·2010·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic dose-response effects of insulin glargine administered subcutaneously in individuals with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty obese type 2 diabetic individuals (10 male and 10 female, aged 50 ± 3 years, with BMI 36 ± 2 kg/m2 and A1C 8.3 ± 0.6%) were studied in this single-center, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind study. Five subcutaneous doses of insulin glargine (0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 units/kg) were investigated on separate occasions using the 24-h euglycemic clamp technique. RESULTS: Glargine duration of action to reduce glucose, nonessential fatty acid (NEFA), and β-hydroxybutyrate levels was close to or >24 h for all four doses. Increases in glucose flux revealed no discernible peak and were modest with maximal glucose infusion rates of 9.4, 6.6, 5.5, and 2.8 μmol/kg/min for the 2.0, 1.5, 1.0, and 0.5 units/kg doses, respectively. Glargine exhibited a relatively hepatospecific action with greater suppression (P < 0.05) of endogenous glucose production (EGP) compared with little or no increases in glucose disposal. CONCLUSION: A single subcutaneous injection of glargine at a dose of ≥0.5 units/kg can acutely reduce glucose, NEFA, and ketone body levels for 24 h in obese insulin-resistant type 2 diabetic individuals. Glargine lowers blood glucose by mainly inhibiting EGP with limited effects on stimulating glucose disposal. Large doses of glargine have minimal effects on glucose flux and retain a relatively hepatospecific action in type 2 diabetes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc09-2011

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. [1]Riddle MC Rosenstock J Gerich J Insulin Glargine 4002 Study Investigators. The treat to target trial: randomized addition of glargine or human NPH insulin to oral therapy of type 2 diabetic patients Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 3080– 3086 14578243
  2. [2]Janka HU Plewe G Riddle MC Kliebe-Frisch C Schweitzer MA Yki-Järvinen H: Comparison of basal insulin added to oral agents versus twice-daily premixed insulin as initial insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 254– 259 15677775
  3. [3]Fritsche A Schweitzer MA Häring HU: Glimepiride combined with morning insulin glargine, bedtime neutral protamine hagedorn insulin, or bedtime insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138: 952– 959 12809451
  4. [4]Porcellati F Rossetti P Busciantella NR Marzotti S Lucidi P Luzio S Owens DR Bolli GB Fanelli CG: Comparison of pharmacokinetics and dynamics of the long acting insulin analogs glargine and detemir at steady state in type 1 diabetes: a double-blind randomized crossover study. Diabetes Care 2007; 30: 2447– 2452 17623819
  5. [6]Luzio S Dunseath G Peter R Pauvaday V Owens DR: Comparison of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of biphasic insulin aspart and insulin glargine in people with type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 2006; 49: 1163– 1168 16596358
  6. [7]Hompesch M Ocheltree SM Wondmagegnehu ET Morrow LA Kollmeier AP Campaigne BN Jacober SJ: Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of insulin lispro protamine suspension compared with insulin glargine and insulin detemir in type 2 diabetes. Curr Med Res Opin 2009; 25: 2679– 2687 19761358
  7. [8]Klein O Lynge J Endahl L Damholt B Nosek L Heise T: Albumin-bound basal insulin analogues (insulin detemir and NN344): comparable time action profiles but less variability than insulin glargine in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab 2007; 9: 290– 299 17391154
  8. [9]Heinemann L Ampudia-Blasco FJ: Glucose clamps with the Biostator: a critical reappraisal. Horm Metab Res 1994; 26: 579– 583 7705762
  9. [10]Abumrad NN Rabin D Diamond MP Lacy WW: Use of a heated superficial hand vein as an alternative site for the measurement of amino acid concentration and for the study of glucose and alanine kinetics in man. Metabolism 1981; 30: 936– 940 7022111
  10. [12]Wall JS Steele R De Bodo RC Altszuler N: Effect of insulin on utilization and production of circulating glucose. Am J Physiol 1957; 189: 43– 50 13424687
  11. [13]Kuerzel GU Shukla U Scholtz HE Pretorius SG Wessels DH Venter C Potgieter MA Lang AM Koose T Bernhardt E: Biotransformation of insulin glargine after subcutaneous injection in healthy subjects. Curr Med Res Opin 2003; 19: 34– 40 12661778
  12. [14]Heinemann L Linkeschova R Rave K Hompesch B Sedlak M Heise T: Time-action profile of the long-acting insulin analog insulin glargine (HOE901) in comparison with those of NPH insulin and placebo. Diabetes Care 2000; 23: 644– 649 10834424
  13. [15]Scholtz HE Pretorius SG Wessels DH Venter C Potgieter MA Becker RH: Equipotency of insulin glargine and regular human insulin on glucose disposal in healthy subjects following intravenous infusion. Acta Diabetol 2003; 40: 156– 162 14740274
  14. [16]Aguilar-Parada E Eisentraut AM Unger RH: Pancreatic glucagon secretion in normal and diabetic subjects. Am J Med Sci 1969; 257: 415– 419 4893149
  15. [17]Lloyd B Burrin J Smythe P Alberti KG: Enzymatic fluorometric continuous-flow assays for blood glucose lactate, pyruvate, alanine, glycerol, and β-hydroxybutyrate. Clin Chem 1978; 24: 1724– 1729 699277
  16. [18]Porcellati F Rossetti P Ricci NB Pampanelli S Torlone E Campos SH Andreoli AM Bolli GB Fanelli CG: Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the long-acting insulin analog glargine after 1 week of use compared with its first administration in subjects with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2007; 30: 1261– 1263 17303785
  17. [19]Luzio SD Beck P Owens DR: Comparison of the subcutaneous absorption of insulin glargine (Lantus) and NPH insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes. Horm Metab Res 2003; 35: 434– 438 12931275
  18. [20]Ciaraldi TP Carter L Seipke G Mudaliar S Henry RR: Effects of the long-acting insulin analog insulin glargine on cultured human skeletal muscle cells: comparison to insulin and IGF-I. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001; 86: 5838– 5847 11739448
  19. [21]Ross Kamp RH Park G: Long acting insulin analogs. Diabetes Care 1999; 22(Suppl. 2): B109– B113 10097910
  20. [22]Heinemann L: Variability of insulin absorption and insulin action. Diabetes Technol Ther 2002; 4: 673– 682 12450450
  21. [23]Hendrick GK Wasserman D Frizzell R Williams P Lacy DB Jaspan J Cherrington A: Importance of basal glucagon in maintaining hepatic glucose production during a prolonged fast in conscious dogs. Am J Physiol Endocrinol and Metab 1992; 263: E541– E549 1415534

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, Z., Hedrington, M. S., Gogitidze Joy, N., Briscoe, V. J., Richardson, M. A., Younk, L., Nicholson, W., Tate, D. B., & Davis, S. N.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Corresponding author
Davis, Stephen N.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2010-03-31
Volume
33
Issue
7
Pages
1555-1560
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2155918752
Cited by
44
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Vanderbilt University
  • National Institutes of Health (5p60dk020593-31, DK-020593)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P60-DK020593, P30DK079637)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01RR000095)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
insulin glargine, type 2 diabetes, dose-response relationship, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, duration of action, euglycemic clamp, endogenous glucose production, glucose disposal, beta-hydroxybutyrate, ketone bodies, insulin resistance, obesity, subcutaneous insulin
MeSH terms
Insulin Glargine, Blood Glucose, C-Peptide, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Fatty Acids, Nonesterified, Female, Glucagon, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Injections, Subcutaneous, Insulin, Male, Middle Aged, Glucose Clamp Technique, Insulin, Long-Acting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review