Cited by 195Diabetes and associated disordersDiabetes Management and ResearchPancreatic function and diabetes

Age of Islet Autoantibody Appearance and Mean Levels of Insulin, but Not GAD or IA-2 Autoantibodies, Predict Age of Diagnosis of Type 1 Diabetes

Open access
Steck, Andrea K., Johnson, Kelly, Barriga, Katherine J., Miao, Dongmei, Yu, Liping, Hutton, John C., Eisenbarth, George S., Rewers, Marian J.·2011·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated predictors of progression to diabetes in children with high-risk HLA genotypes and persistent islet autoantibodies. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The Diabetes Autoimmunity Study in the Young (DAISY) followed 2,542 children with autoantibodies measured to GAD, IA-2, and insulin. RESULTS: Persistent islet autoantibodies developed in 169 subjects, and 55 of those progressed to diabetes. Children expressing three autoantibodies showed a linear progression to diabetes with 74% cumulative incidence by the 10-year follow-up compared with 70% with two antibodies and 15% with one antibody (P < 0.0001). Both age of appearance of first autoantibody and insulin autoantibody (IAA) levels, but not GAD or IA-2 autoantibodies, were major determinants of the age of diabetes diagnosis (r = 0.79, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In the DAISY cohort, 89% of children who progressed to diabetes expressed two or more autoantibodies. Age of diagnosis of diabetes is strongly correlated with age of appearance of first autoantibody and IAA levels.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc10-2088

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • IAA concentration correlates with the rate of progression to overt type 1 diabetes in children followed from birth.

    “IAA concentration correlates with the rate of progression to overt type 1 diabetes in children followed from birth.67,68”

    From Type 1 diabetes (2014) · cites this paper as [67]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. [1]Yu L Cuthbertson DD Maclaren N Expression of GAD65 and islet cell antibody (ICA512) autoantibodies among cytoplasmic ICA+ relatives is associated with eligibility for the Diabetes Prevention Trial-Type 1. Diabetes 2001; 50: 1735– 1740 11473032
  2. [2]Greenbaum CJ Palmer JP Kuglin B Kolb H Insulin autoantibodies measured by radioimmunoassay methodology are more related to insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus than those measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay: results of the Fourth International Workshop on the Standardization of Insulin Autoantibody Measurement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1992; 74: 1040– 1044 1569152
  3. [3]Baekkeskov S Aanstoot H-J Christgau S Identification of the 64K autoantigen in insulin-dependent diabetes as the GABA-synthesizing enzyme glutamic acid decarboxylase. Nature 1990; 347: 151– 156 [erratum in Nature 1990;347:782] 1697648
  4. [4]Gianani R Rabin DU Verge CF ICA512 autoantibody radioassay. Diabetes 1995; 44: 1340– 1344 7589834
  5. [5]Bingley PJ Bonifacio E Ziegler AG Schatz DA Atkinson MA Eisenbarth GS; Immunology of Diabetes Society Proposed guidelines on screening for risk of type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2001; 24: 398 11213898
  6. [6]Rewers M, Bugawan TL, Norris JM, et al. Newborn screening for HLA markers associated with IDDM: Diabetes Autoimmunity Study in the Young (DAISY). Diabetologia 1996;39:807–812 8817105
  7. [8]Orban T Sosenko JM Cuthbertson D Pancreatic islet autoantibodies as predictors of type 1 diabetes in the Diabetes Prevention Trial-Type 1. Diabetes Care 2009; 32: 2269– 2274 19741189 PMC2782989
  8. [9]Walter M, Albert E, Conrad M, et al. IDDM2/insulin VNTR modifies risk conferred by IDDM1/HLA for development of type 1 diabetes and associated autoimmunity. Diabetologia 2003;46:712–720 12750767
  9. [10]Bonifacio E Hummel M Walter M Schmid S Ziegler AG IDDM1 and multiple family history of type 1 diabetes combine to identify neonates at high risk for type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 2695– 2700 15505007
  10. [11]Mrena S Virtanen SM Laippala P Models for predicting type 1 diabetes in siblings of affected children. Diabetes Care 2006; 29: 662– 667 16505523
  11. [12]Siljander HT, Veijola R, Reunanen A, Virtanen SM, Akerblom HK, Knip M. Prediction of type 1 diabetes among siblings of affected children and in the general population. Diabetologia 2007;50:2272–2275 17768605
  12. [13]Knip M Korhonen S Kulmala P Prediction of type 1 diabetes in the general population. Diabetes Care 2010; 33: 1206– 1212 20508230 PMC2875424
  13. [14]Siljander HT Simell S Hekkala A Predictive characteristics of diabetes-associated autoantibodies among children with HLA-conferred disease susceptibility in the general population. Diabetes 2009; 58: 2835– 2842 19755526 PMC2780879
  14. [15]Eisenbarth GS Banting Lecture 2009: An unfinished journey: Molecular pathogenesis to prevention of type 1A diabetes. Diabetes 2010; 59: 759– 774 20350969 PMC2844823

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steck, A. K., Johnson, K., Barriga, K. J., Miao, D., Yu, L., Hutton, J. C., Eisenbarth, G. S., & Rewers, M. J.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Denver (US)
Corresponding author
Steck, Andrea K.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2011-05-20
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
1397-1399
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2107053825
Cited by
195
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 17
FWCI
8.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01ai15416-28-0-11, AI050864, DK57516, DK32493)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (N01 AI 15416, AI 050864, U19AI050864, N01-AI-015416)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK057516, DK 57516, R01DK032493, R37-DK32493, R37DK032493, DK050979, R01DK050979, DK-320083)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, islet autoantibodies, insulin autoantibodies, glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies, IA-2 autoantibodies, age at diagnosis, disease progression, children
MeSH terms
Autoantibodies, Child, Child, Preschool, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Glutamate Decarboxylase, Humans, Infant, Insulin, Insulin Antibodies, Islets of Langerhans, Prospective Studies, Age of Onset, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review