The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The LiP (Lifestyle in Pregnancy) Study
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To study the effects of lifestyle intervention on gestational weight gain (GWG) and obstetric outcomes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The LiP (Lifestyle in Pregnancy) study was a randomized controlled trial in 360 obese women allocated in early pregnancy to lifestyle intervention or control. The intervention program included dietary guidance, free membership in fitness centers, physical training, and personal coaching. RESULTS: A total of 360 obese pregnant women were included, and 304 (84%) were followed up until delivery. The intervention group had a significantly lower median (range) GWG compared with the control group of 7.0 (4.7–10.6) vs. 8.6 kg (5.7–11.5; P = 0.01). The Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendations on GWG were exceeded in 35.4% of women in the intervention group compared with 46.6% in the control group (P = 0.058). Overall, the obstetric outcomes between the two groups were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Lifestyle intervention in pregnancy resulted in limited GWG in obese pregnant women. Overall obstetric outcomes were similar in the two groups. Lifestyle intervention resulted in a higher adherence to the IOM weight gain recommendations; however, a significant number of women still exceeded the upper threshold.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Clausen, T. D., Mathiesen, E. R., Hansen, T., Pedersen, O., Jensen, D. M., Lauenborg, J., & Damm, P. (2008) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc07-1596 · Cited by 724
Self-citationEhrlich, S. F., Hedderson, M. M., Feng, J., Davenport, E. R., Gunderson, E. P., & Ferrara, A. (2011) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e31821aa358 · Cited by 130
Cited by
Catalano, P. M., & Shankar, K. (2017) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.j1 · Cited by 1,306
Thangaratinam, S., Rogozinska, E., Jolly, K., Glinkowski, S., Roseboom, T., Tomlinson, J. W., Kunz, R., Mol, B. W., Coomarasamy, A., & Khan, K. S. (2012) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.e2088 · Cited by 802
Poston, L., Bell, R., Croker, H., Flynn, A. C., Godfrey, K. M., Goff, L., Hayes, L., Khazaezadeh, N., Nelson, S. M., Oteng-Ntim, E., et al. (2015) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(15)00227-2 · Cited by 642
Diet or exercise, or both, for preventing excessive weight gain in pregnancy
Muktabhant, B., Lawrie, T. A., Lumbiganon, P., & Laopaiboon, M. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007145.pub3 · Cited by 601
Davenport, M. H., Ruchat, S.-M., Poitras, V. J., Jaramillo Garcia, A., Gray, C. E., Barrowman, N., Skow, R. J., Meah, V. L., Riske, L., Sobierajski, F., et al. (2018) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2018-099355 · Cited by 579
Metadata
- Authors
- Vinter, C. A., Jensen, D. M., Ovesen, P., Beck-Nielsen, H., & Jørgensen, J. S.
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2011-11-14
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2502-2507
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2037852083
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 24.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The LiP (Lifestyle in Pregnancy) Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/dc11-1150
- The paper
- Vinter, C. A., Jensen, D. M., Ovesen, P., Beck-Nielsen, H., & Jørgensen, J. S. (2011). The LiP (Lifestyle in Pregnancy) Study. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc11-1150
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
