Cited by 802Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Effects of interventions in pregnancy on maternal weight and obstetric outcomes: meta-analysis of randomised evidence

Open access
Thangaratinam, S., Rogozinska, E., Jolly, K., Glinkowski, S., Roseboom, T., Tomlinson, J. W., Kunz, R., Mol, B. W. +2 more·2012·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of dietary and lifestyle interventions in pregnancy on maternal and fetal weight and to quantify the effects of these interventions on obstetric outcomes. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Major databases from inception to January 2012 without language restrictions. STUDY SELECTION: Randomised controlled trials that evaluated any dietary or lifestyle interventions with potential to influence maternal weight during pregnancy and outcomes of pregnancy. DATA SYNTHESIS: Results summarised as relative risks for dichotomous data and mean differences for continuous data. RESULTS: We identified 44 relevant randomised controlled trials (7278 women) evaluating three categories of interventions: diet, physical activity, and a mixed approach. Overall, there was 1.42 kg reduction (95% confidence interval 0.95 to 1.89 kg) in gestational weight gain with any intervention compared with control. With all interventions combined, there were no significant differences in birth weight (mean difference -50 g, -100 to 0 g) and the incidence of large for gestational age (relative risk 0.85, 0.66 to 1.09) or small for gestational age (1.00, 0.78 to 1.28) babies between the groups, though by itself physical activity was associated with reduced birth weight (mean difference -60 g, -120 to -10 g). Interventions were associated with a reduced the risk of pre-eclampsia (0.74, 0.60 to 0.92) and shoulder dystocia (0.39, 0.22 to 0.70), with no significant effect on other critically important outcomes. Dietary intervention resulted in the largest reduction in maternal gestational weight gain (3.84 kg, 2.45 to 5.22 kg), with improved pregnancy outcomes compared with other interventions. The overall evidence rating was low to very low for important outcomes such as pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension, and preterm delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Dietary and lifestyle interventions in pregnancy can reduce maternal gestational weight gain and improve outcomes for both mother and baby. Among the interventions, those based on diet are the most effective and are associated with reductions in maternal gestational weight gain and improved obstetric outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.e2088

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An earlier meta-analysis of 44 RCTs found that interventions that mixed physical activity goals with dietary change were ineffective.

    “An earlier meta‐analysis of 44 RCTs found that interventions that mixed physical activity goals with dietary change were ineffective, but diet‐based interventions had the capacity to lower GWG and reduce risk of GHT, PE, GDM, preterm birth and labour induction. 132”

    From Overweight, obesity and excessive weight gain in pregnancy as risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes: A narrative review (2022) · cites this paper as [132]

    Results (Study selection) identify 44 RCTs, including 13 of mixed diet-and-physical-activity interventions. The Discussion (Clinical and practical implications) reports that mixed interventions reduced gestational weight gain by about 1 kg, so calling them ineffective is too broad. The Discussion (Summary of the findings) supports the claimed benefits of diet-based interventions for weight gain, gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes and preterm birth, but explicitly says there was no evidence that interventions reduced labour induction. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Diet-based interventions had the capacity to reduce risk of GHT, PE, GDM, preterm birth and labour induction.

    “An earlier meta‐analysis of 44 RCTs found that interventions that mixed physical activity goals with dietary change were ineffective, but diet‐based interventions had the capacity to lower GWG and reduce risk of GHT, PE, GDM, preterm birth and labour induction. 132”

    From Overweight, obesity and excessive weight gain in pregnancy as risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes: A narrative review (2022) · cites this paper as [132]

    The Results table on secondary maternal outcomes reports reduced risks of gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes, and preterm delivery with dietary interventions. It does not support reduced labour induction: the dietary-intervention estimate is 1.12 (95% CI 0.99–1.27), and the Discussion’s summary explicitly says there was no evidence of a reduction in induction of labour. (LLM, conf=0.93)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The literature does not show that physical exercise increases the risk of preterm birth.

    “The literature does not show that physical exercise increases the risk of preterm birth [5, 9–11, 29, 30].”
  • Several reviews describe significant differences in reduction of weight gain, of modest magnitude close to 1 kg.

    “Several reviews [5, 11, 28, 29] describe significant differences in the reduction of weight gain, which are of modest magnitude, close to 1 kg of weight.”
  • Diet-based interventions had the capacity to lower GWG.

    “An earlier meta‐analysis of 44 RCTs found that interventions that mixed physical activity goals with dietary change were ineffective, but diet‐based interventions had the capacity to lower GWG and reduce risk of GHT, PE, GDM, preterm birth and labour induction. 132”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 79

  1. [2]Thangaratinam S, Jolly K. Obesity in pregnancy: a review of reviews on the effectiveness of interventions. BJOG 2010; 117: 1309-12. 20862792
  2. [3]Ramachendran J, Bradford J, McLean J. Maternal obesity and pregnancy complications: a review. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2008; 48: 228-45. 18532950
  3. [5]Drake AJ, Reynolds RM. Impact of maternal obesity on offspring obesity and cardiometabolic disease risk. Reproduction 2010; 140: 387-98. 20562299
  4. [7]Jackson RA, Stotland NE, Caughey AB, Gerbert B. Improving diet and exercise in pregnancy with Video Doctor counseling: a randomized trial. Patient Educ Couns 2011; 83: 203-9. 21459255
  5. [9]Streuling I, Beyerlein A, von Kries. Can gestational weight gain be modified by increasing physical activity and diet counselling? A meta-analysis of interventional trials. Am J Clin Nutr 2010; 92: 678-87. 20668049
  6. [10]Campbell F, Messina J, Johnson M, Guillaume L, Madan J, Goyder E. Systematic review of dietary and/or physical activity interventions for weight management in pregnancy. NICE Centre for Public Health Excellence, 2009.
  7. [14]Khan KS, Kunz R, Kleijnen J, Antes G. Systematic reviews to support evidence-based medicine: how to review and apply findings of systematic reviews. Br J Anaesth 2003; 91: 767-8.
  8. [15]Thangaratinam S, Rogozinska E, Jolly K, Glinkowski S, Duda W, Borowiack E, et al. Interventions to reduce or prevent obesity in pregnant women: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess (in press). PMC4781281 22814301
  9. [19]Review Manager (Computer program). Version 5.1. Nordic Cochrane Centre. Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.
  10. [24]Badrawi H, Hassanein MK, Badraoui MHH, Wafa YA, Shawky HA, Badrawi N. Pregnancy outcome in obese pregnant mothers. J Perinat Med 1992; 20: 203.1453294
  11. [25]Bechtel-Blackwell DA. Computer-assisted self-interview and nutrition education in pregnant teens. Clin Nurs Res 2002; 11: 450-62. 12413116
  12. [26]Briley C, Flanagan NL, Lewis N. In-home prenatal nutrition intervention increased dietary iron intakes and reduced low birthweight in low-income African-American women. J Am Diet Assoc 2002; 102: 984-7. 12146565
  13. [27]Clapp IJF. Diet, exercise, and fete-placental growth. Arch Gynecol Obstet 1997; 260: 101-8.
  14. [29]Gomez TG, Delgado JG, Agudelo AA, Hurtado H. Diet effects on the perinatal result of obese pregnant patient. [Spanish]. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol 1994; 45: 313-6.
  15. [30]Khoury J, Henriksen T, Christophersen B, Tonstad S. Effect of a cholesterol-lowering diet on maternal, cord, and neonatal lipids, and pregnancy outcome: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 1292-301. 16202717
  16. [32]Ney D, Hollingsworth DR, Cousins L. Decreased insulin requirement and improved control of diabetes in pregnant women given a high-carbohydrate, high-fiber, low-fat diet. Diabetes Care 1982; 5: 529-33. 6329613
  17. [33]Quinlivan JA, Lam LT, Fisher J. A randomised trial of a four-step multidisciplinary approach to the antenatal care of obese pregnant women. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2011; 51: 141-6. 21466516
  18. [34]Rae A, Bond D, Evans S, North F, Roberman B, Walters B. A randomised controlled trial of dietary energy restriction in the management of obese women with gestational diabetes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2000; 40: 416-22. 11194427
  19. [35]Thornton YS, Smarkola C, Kopacz SM, Ishoof SB. Perinatal outcomes in nutritionally monitored obese pregnant women: a randomized clinical trial. J Natl Med Assoc 2009; 101: 569-77. 19585925
  20. [36]Wolff S, Legarth J, Vangsgaard K, Toubro S, Astrup A. A randomized trial of the effects of dietary counseling on gestational weight gain and glucose metabolism in obese pregnant women. Int J Obes 2008; 32: 495-501. 18227847
  21. [37]Baciuk EP, Pereira RI, Cecatti JG, Braga AF, Cavalcante SR. Water aerobics in pregnancy: cardiovascular response, labor and neonatal outcomes. Reprod Health 2008; 5: 10. 19025579 PMC2613131
  22. [38]Barakat R, Lucia A, Ruiz JR. Resistance exercise training during pregnancy and newborn’s birth size: a randomised controlled trial. Int J Obes 2009; 33: 1048-57. 19636320
  23. [39]Barakat R, Cordero Y, Coteron J, Luaces M, Montejo R. Exercise during pregnancy improves maternal glucose screen at 24-28 weeks: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Sports Med 2011 Sep 26, epub ahead of print. 21948120
  24. [40]Bell RJ, Palma SM. Antenatal exercise and birth-weight. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2000; 40: 70-3. 10870784
  25. [41]Cavalcante SR, Cecatti JG, Pereira RI, Baciuk EP, Bernardo AL, Silveira C. Water aerobics II: maternal body composition and perinatal outcomes after a program for low risk pregnant women. Reprod Health 2009; 6: 1. 19126239 PMC2628875
  26. [42]Clapp JF, III, Kim H, Burciu B, Lopez B. Beginning regular exercise in early pregnancy: effect on fetoplacental growth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183: 1484-8. 11120515
  27. [43]Erkkola R. The influence of physical exercise during pregnancy upon physical work capacity and circulatory parameters. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1976; 6: 747-9. 1031487
  28. [44]Erkkola R, Makela M. Heart volume and physical fitness of parturients. Ann Clin Res 1976; 8: 15-21. 937989
  29. [45]Garshasbi A, Faghih ZS. The effect of exercise on the intensity of low back pain in pregnant women. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2005; 88: 271-5. 15733880
  30. [46]Haakstad L, Bo K. Exercise in pregnant women and birth weight: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Preg Childbirth 2011; 11: 66. PMC3198740 21961534
  31. [47]Hopkins SA, Baldi JC, Cutfield WS, McCowan L, Hofman PL. Exercise training in pregnancy reduces offspring size without changes in maternal insulin sensitivity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010; 95: 2080-8. 20335449
  32. [48]Khaledan A, Sh, Motahari Tabari NS, Ahmad Shirvani M. Effect of an aerobic exercise program on fetal growth in pregnant women. HAYAT: J Faculty Nurs Midwifery 2010; 16: 78.
  33. [49]Lee G, Challenger S, McNabb M, Sheridan M. Exercise in pregnancy. Mod Midwife 1996; 6: 28-33. 8974676
  34. [50]Marquez-Sterling S, Perry AC, Kaplan TA, Halberstein RA, Signorile JF. Physical and psychological changes with vigorous exercise in sedentary primigravidae. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: 58-62. 10647530
  35. [51]Ong MJ, Guelfi KJ, Hunter T, Wallman KE, Fournier PA, Newnham JP. Supervised home-based exercise may attenuate the decline of glucose tolerance in obese pregnant women. Diabetes Metab 2009; 35: 418-21. 19747869
  36. [52]Prevedel T, Calderon I, DM, Adami H-O, RM. Maternal and perinatal effects of hydrotherapy in pregnancy. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2003; 25: 53-9.
  37. [53]Santos IA, Stein R, Fuchs SC, Duncan BB, Ribeiro JP, Kroeff LR, et al. Aerobic exercise and submaximal functional capacity in overweight pregnant women: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106: 243-9. 16055571
  38. [54]Sedaghati P, Ziaee V, Ardjmand A. The effect of an ergometric training program on pregnants weight gain and low back pain. Gazzetta Medica Italiana Archivio per le Scienze Mediche 2007; 166: 209-13.
  39. [55]Yeo S, Steele NM, Chang MC, Leclaire SM, Ronis DL, Hayashi R. Effect of exercise on blood pressure in pregnant women with a high risk of gestational hypertensive disorders. J Reprod Med 2000; 45: 293-8. 10804484
  40. [56]Asbee SM, Jenkins TR, Butler JR, White J, Elliot M, Rutledge A. Preventing excessive weight gain during pregnancy through dietary and lifestyle counseling: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113: 305-12. 19155899
  41. [57]Bung P, Artal R, Khodiguian N, Kjos S. Exercise in gestational diabetes. An optional therapeutic approach? Diabetes 1991; 40(suppl 2): 182-5. 1748256
  42. [58]Ferrara A, Hedderson MM, Albright CL, Ehrlich SF, Quesenbery CP, Peng TP, et al. A pregnancy and postpartum lifestyle intervention in women with gestational diabetes mellitus reduces diabetes risk factors. A feasibility randomized control trial. Diabetes Care 2011; 34: 1519-25. 21540430 PMC3120183
  43. [59]Guelinckx I, Devlieger R, Mullie P, Vansant G. Effect of lifestyle intervention on dietary habits, physical activity, and gestational weight gain in obese pregnant women: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2010; 91: 373-80. 19955397
  44. [60]Huang TT, Yeh CY, Tsai YC. A diet and physical activity intervention for preventing weight retention among Taiwanese childbearing women: a randomised controlled trial. Midwifery 2011; 27: 257-64. 19775782
  45. [61]Hui A, Back L, Ludwig S, Gardiner P, Sevenhuysen G, Dean H, et al. Lifestyle intervention on diet and exercise reduced excessive gestational weight gain in pregnant women under a randomised controlled trial. BJOG 2011; 119: 70-7. 22017967
  46. [62]Hui AL, Ludwig SM, Gardiner P, Sevenhuysen G, Murray R, Morris M, et al. Community-based exercise and dietary intervention during pregnancy: a pilot study. Can J Diabetes 2006; 30: 169-75.
  47. [63]Jeffries K, Shub A, Walker SP, Hiscock R, Permezel M. Reducing excessive weight gain in pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial. Med J Aust 2009; 191: 429-33. 19835535
  48. [64]Kulpa PJ, White BM, Visscher R. Aerobic exercise in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 156: 1395-403. 3591854
  49. [65]Phelan S, Phipps MG, Abrams B, Darroch F, Schaffner A, Wing RR. Randomized trial of a behavioral intervention to prevent excessive gestational weight gain: the Fit for Delivery Study. Am J Clin Nutr 2011; 93: 772-9. 21310836 PMC3057546
  50. [66]Polley BA, Wing RR, Sims CJ. Randomized controlled trial to prevent excessive weight gain in pregnant women. Int J Obes 2002; 26: 1494-502. 12439652
  51. [67]Vinter CA, Jensen DM, Ovesen P, Beck-Nielsen H, Jorgensen JS. The LiP (Lifestyle in Pregnancy) study: a randomized controlled trial of lifestyle intervention in 360 obese pregnant women. Diabetes Care 2011; 34: 2502-7. 21972411 PMC3220844
  52. [68]Carmichael SL, Shaw GM, Schaffer DM, Laurent C, Selvin S. Dieting behaviors and risk of neural tube defects. Am J Epidemiol 2003; 158: 1127-31. 14652296
  53. [69]Clapp JF, III. The course of labor after endurance exercise during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163: 1799-805. 2256485
  54. [70]Clapp JF, III, Capeless EL. Neonatal morphometrics after endurance exercise during pregnancy. Am Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163: 1805-11. 2256486
  55. [71]Dale E, Mullinax KM, Bryan DH. Exercise during pregnancy: effects on the fetus. C J Appl Sport Sci 1982; 7: 98-103. 7105378
  56. [72]De Rooij SR, Painter RC, Holleman F, Bossuyt PM, Roseboom TJ. The metabolic syndrome in adults prenatally exposed to the Dutch famine. Am J Clin Nutr 2007; 86: 1219-24. 17921405
  57. [73]Gregory PB, Rush D. Iatrogenic caloric restriction in pregnancy and birthweight. Am J Perinatol 1987; 4: 365-71. 3651196
  58. [74]Hatch MC, Shu XO, McLean DE, Levin B, Begg M, Reuss L, et al. Maternal exercise during pregnancy, physical fitness, and fetal growth. Am J Epidemiol 1993; 137: 1105-14. 8317440
  59. [75]Knudsen VK, Orozova-Bekkevold IM, Mikkelsen TB, Wolff S, Olsen SF. Major dietary patterns in pregnancy and fetal growth. Eur J Clin Nutr 2008; 62: 463-70. 17392696
  60. [76]Lenders CM, Hediger ML, Scholl TO, Khoo CS, Slap GB, Stallings VA. Effect of high-sugar intake by low-income pregnant adolescents on infant birth weight. J Adolesc Health 1994; 15: 596-602. 7857959
  61. [77]Lenders CM, Hediger ML, Scholl TO, Khoo CS, Slap GB, Stallings VA. Gestational age and infant size at birth are associated with dietary sugar intake among pregnant adolescents. J Nutr 1997; 127: 1113-7. 9187625
  62. [78]Lumey LH, Stein AD, Kahn HS, Romijn JA. Lipid profiles in middle-aged men and women after famine exposure during gestation: the Dutch Hunger Winter Families Study. Am J Clin Nutr 2009; 89: 1737-43. 19386743 PMC2682992
  63. [79]Magann EF, Evans SF, Weitz B, Newnham J. Antepartum, intrapartum, and neonatal significance of exercise on healthy low-risk pregnant working women. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99: 466-72. 11864675
  64. [80]Neugebauer R, Hoek HW, Susser E. Prenatal exposure to wartime famine and development of antisocial personality disorder in early adulthood. JAMA 1999; 282: 455-62. 10442661
  65. [81]Ravelli AC, van der Meulen JH, Michels RP, Osmond C, Barker DJ, Hales CN, et al. Glucose tolerance in adults after prenatal exposure to famine. Lancet 1998; 351: 173-7. 9449872
  66. [83]Roseboom TJ, van der Meulen JH, Osmond C, Barker DJ, Ravelli AC, Bleker OP. Plasma lipid profiles in adults after prenatal exposure to the Dutch famine. Am J Clin Nutr 2000; 72: 1101-6. 11063435
  67. [84]Roseboom TJ, van der Meulen JH, Osmond C, Barker DJ, Ravelli AC, Schroeder-Tanka JM, et al. Coronary heart disease after prenatal exposure to the Dutch famine, 1944-45. Heart 2000; 84: 595-8. 11083734 PMC1729504
  68. [85]Schramm WF, Stockbauer JW, Hoffman HJ. Exercise, employment, other daily activities, and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Am J Epidemiol 1996; 143: 211-8. 8561154
  69. [86]Stanner SA, K Bulmer, C Andrès, O E Lantseva, V Borodina, V V Poteen, et al. Does malnutrition in utero determine diabetes and coronaryè heart disease in adulthood? Results from the Leningrad siege study, a cross sectional study. BMJ 1997; 315: 1342-8. 9402775 PMC2127836
  70. [87]Stein AD, Kahn HS, Rundle A, Zybert PA, van der Pal-de Bruin, Lumey LH. Anthropometric measures in middle age after exposure to famine during gestation: evidence from the Dutch famine. Am J Clin Nutr 2007; 85: 869-76. 17344511
  71. [88]Vujkovic M, Ocke MC, Van Der Spek PJ, Yazdanpanah N, Steegers EA, Steegers-Theunissen RP. Maternal western dietary patterns and the risk of developing a cleft lip with or without a cleft palate. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110: 378-84. 17666614
  72. [89]Yazdy MM, Liu S, Mitchell AA, Werler MM. Maternal dietary glycemic intake and the risk of neural tube defects. Am J Epidemiol 2010; 171: 407-14. 20042435 PMC2842193
  73. [90]Painter RC, De R, Sr., Bossuyt PM, Osmond C, Barker DJ, Bleker OP, et al. A possible link between prenatal exposure to famine and breast cancer: a preliminary study. Am J Hum Biol 2006; 18: 853-6. 17039469
  74. [91]De Rooij SR, Painter RC, Phillips DI, Osmond C, Tanck MW, Bossuyt PM, et al. Cortisol responses to psychological stress in adults after prenatal exposure to the Dutch famine. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2006; 31: 1257-65. 17081701
  75. [93]Clarke PE, Gross H. Women’s behaviour, beliefs and information sources about physical exercise in pregnancy. Midwifery 2009; 20: 133-41. 15177856
  76. [94]Gross H, Bee PE. Perceptions of effective advice in pregnancy. The case of activity. Clin Eff Nurs 2004; 8: 161-9.
  77. [95]Ray JG, Diamond P, Singh G, Bell CM. Brief overview of maternal triglycerides as a risk factor for pre-eclampsia. BJOG 2006; 113: 379-86. 16553649
  78. [96]Qiu C, Coughlin KB, Frederick IO, Sorensen TK, Williams MA. Dietary fiber intake in early pregnancy and risk of subsequent preeclampsia. Am J Hypertens 2008; 21: 903-9. 18636070
  79. [98]Lambert PC, Sutton RJ, Abrams KR, Jones DR. A comparison of summary patient-level covariates in meta-regression with individual patient data meta-analysis. Clin Epidemiol 2002; 55: 86-94. 11781126

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thangaratinam, S., Rogozinska, E., Jolly, K., Glinkowski, S., Roseboom, T., Tomlinson, J. W., Kunz, R., Mol, B. W., Coomarasamy, A., & Khan, K. S.
Affiliations
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • University of Basel (CH)
Corresponding author
Thangaratinam, S.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2012-05-16
Volume
344
Issue
may16 4
Pages
e2088-e2088
ISSN
1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074585667
Cited by
802
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 77 · 2016: 88 · 2015: 89 · 2014: 81 · 2013: 53 · 2012: 28
FWCI
13.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • edoc (University of Basel) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (09/27/06)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
pregnancy, dietary intervention, lifestyle intervention, gestational weight gain, maternal weight, birth weight, large for gestational age, small for gestational age, physical activity, preeclampsia, shoulder dystocia, obstetric outcomes, gestational diabetes mellitus, preterm birth
MeSH terms
Body Weight, Diet, Reducing, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Motor Activity, Obesity, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Pregnancy Outcome, Risk Factors, Weight Loss, Body Mass Index, Confidence Intervals, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Risk Reduction Behavior, Premature Birth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review