The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Long-Term Prognosis of Diabetic Foot Patients and Their Limbs
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: There is a dearth of long-term data regarding patient and limb survival in patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). The purpose of our study was therefore to prospectively investigate the limb and person survival of DFU patients during a follow-up period of more than 10 years. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Two hundred forty-seven patients with DFUs and without previous major amputation consecutively presenting to a single diabetes center between June 1998 and December 1999 were included in this study and followed up until May 2011. Mean patient age was 68.8 ± 10.9 years, 58.7% were male, and 55.5% had peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Times to first major amputation and to death were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox multiple regression. RESULTS: A first major amputation occurred in 38 patients (15.4%) during follow-up. All but one of these patients had evidence of PAD at inclusion in the study, and 51.4% had severe PAD [ankle-brachial pressure index ≤0.4]). Age (hazard ratio [HR] per year, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.01–1.10]), being on dialysis (3.51 [1.02–12.07]), and PAD (35.34 [4.81–259.79]) were significant predictors for first major amputation. Cumulative mortalities at years 1, 3, 5, and 10 were 15.4, 33.1, 45.8, and 70.4%, respectively. Significant predictors for death were age (HR per year, 1.08 [95% CI, 1.06–1.10]), male sex ([1.18–2.32]), chronic renal insufficiency (1.83 [1.25–2.66]), dialysis (6.43 [3.14–13.16]), and PAD (1.44 [1.05–1.98]). CONCLUSIONS: Although long-term limb salvage in this modern series of diabetic foot patients is favorable, long-term survival remains poor, especially among patients with PAD or renal insufficiency.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sex and Gender Differences in Risk, Pathophysiology and Complications of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Kautzky-Willer, A., Harreiter, J., & Pacini, G. (2016) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2015-1137 · Cited by 2,043
Armstrong, D. G., Swerdlow, M. A., Armstrong, A. A., Conte, M. S., Padula, W. V., & Bus, S. A. (2020) · Journal of Foot and Ankle Research · doi:10.1186/s13047-020-00383-2 · Cited by 975
Self-citationHingorani, A., LaMuraglia, G. M., Henke, P., Meissner, M. H., Loretz, L., Zinszer, K. M., Driver, V. R., Frykberg, R., Carman, T. L., Marston, W., et al. (2016) · Journal of Vascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2015.10.003 · Cited by 641
Current challenges and opportunities in the prevention and management of diabetic foot ulcers.
Jeffcoate, W. J., Vileikyte, L., Boyko, E. J., Armstrong, D. G., & Boulton, A. J. M. (2018) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc17-1836 · Cited by 475
Self-citationHinchliffe, R. J., Forsythe, R. O., Apelqvist, J., Boyko, E. J., Fitridge, R., Hong, J. P., Katsanos, K., Mills, J. L., Nikol, S., Reekers, J., et al. (2020) · Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews · doi:10.1002/dmrr.3276 · Cited by 383
Metadata
- Authors
- Morbach, S., Furchert, H., Gröblinghoff, U., Hoffmeier, H., Kersten, K., Klauke, G.-T., Klemp, U., Roden, T., Icks, A., Haastert, B., Rümenapf, G., Abbas, Z. G., Bharara, M., & Armstrong, D. G.
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2012-09-11
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2021-2027
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2109632681
- Cited by
- 446
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-Term Prognosis of Diabetic Foot Patients and Their Limbs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/dc12-0200
- The paper
- Morbach, S., Furchert, H., Gröblinghoff, U., Hoffmeier, H., Kersten, K., Klauke, G.-T., Klemp, U., Roden, T., Icks, A., Haastert, B., Rümenapf, G., Abbas, Z. G., Bharara, M., & Armstrong, D. G. (2012). Long-Term Prognosis of Diabetic Foot Patients and Their Limbs. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc12-0200
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.