Cited by 475Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and ManagementSkin Diseases and DiabetesWound Healing and Treatments

Current challenges and opportunities in the prevention and management of diabetic foot ulcers.

Open access
Jeffcoate, William J., Vileikyte, Loretta, Boyko, Edward J., Armstrong, David G., Boulton, Andrew J.M.·2018·Diabetes Care

Abstract

Diabetic foot ulcers remain a major health care problem. They are common, result in considerable suffering, frequently recur, and are associated with high mortality, as well as considerable health care costs. While national and international guidance exists, the evidence base for much of routine clinical care is thin. It follows that many aspects of the structure and delivery of care are susceptible to the beliefs and opinion of individuals. It is probable that this contributes to the geographic variation in outcome that has been documented in a number of countries. This article considers these issues in depth and emphasizes the urgent need to improve the design and conduct of clinical trials in this field, as well as to undertake systematic comparison of the results of routine care in different health economies. There is strong suggestive evidence to indicate that appropriate changes in the relevant care pathways can result in a prompt improvement in clinical outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc17-1836

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two national surveys of clinicians in the United States and Australia show that the total contact cast was used in only 2% and 15% of patients, respectively, as a primary means of off-loading.

    “Two national surveys of clinicians in the United States and Australia show that the total contact cast was used in only 2% and 15% of patients, respectively, as a primary means of off-loading.56,57”

    From Diabetic Foot Ulcers (2023) · cites this paper as [57]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jeffcoate, W. J., Vileikyte, L., Boyko, E. J., Armstrong, D. G., & Boulton, A. J. M.
Affiliations
  • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
  • Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K., and Diabetes Research Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL
  • VA Puget Sound Health Care System (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
Corresponding author
Jeffcoate, William J.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2018-03-12
Volume
41
Issue
4
Pages
645-652
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2790092059
Cited by
475
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 9
FWCI
7.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Diseases and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
Keywords
diabetic foot ulcer, ulcer prevention, ulcer treatment, regional variation in outcomes, clinical trial design, care pathways, routine clinical practice, health care costs, mortality
MeSH terms
Delivery of Health Care, Geography, Humans, Preventive Medicine, Incidence, Treatment Outcome, Health Care Costs, Diabetic Foot, Critical Pathways, Quality Improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review