Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 282

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Risk Factors for Plantar Foot Ulcer Recurrence in Neuropathic Diabetic Patients

Open access
Waaijman, Roelof, de Haart, Mirjam, Arts, Mark L.J., Wever, Daniel, Verlouw, Anke J.W.E., Nollet, Frans, Bus, Sicco A.·2014·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Recurrence of plantar foot ulcers is a common and major problem in diabetes but not well understood. Foot biomechanics and patient behavior may be important. The aim was to identify risk factors for ulcer recurrence and to establish targets for ulcer prevention. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: As part of a footwear trial, 171 neuropathic diabetic patients with a recently healed plantar foot ulcer and custom-made footwear were followed for 18 months or until ulceration. Demographic data, disease-related parameters, presence of minor lesions, barefoot and in-shoe plantar peak pressures, footwear adherence, and daily stride count were entered in a multivariate multilevel logistic regression model of plantar foot ulcer recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 71 patients had a recurrent ulcer. Significant independent predictors were presence of minor lesions (odds ratio 9.06 [95% CI 2.98–27.57]), day-to-day variation in stride count (0.93 [0.89–0.99]), and cumulative duration of past foot ulcers (1.03 [1.00–1.06]). Significant independent predictors for those 41 recurrences suggested to be the result of unrecognized repetitive trauma were presence of minor lesions (10.95 [5.01–23.96]), in-shoe peak pressure <200 kPa with footwear adherence >80% (0.43 [0.20–0.94]), barefoot peak pressure (1.11 [1.00–1.22]), and day-to-day variation in stride count (0.91 [0.86–0.96]). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of a minor lesion was clearly the strongest predictor, while recommended use of adequately offloading footwear was a strong protector against ulcer recurrence from unrecognized repetitive trauma. These outcomes define clear targets for diabetic foot screening and ulcer prevention.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc13-2470

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 282

Metadata

Authors
Waaijman, R., de Haart, M., Arts, M. L. J., Wever, D., Verlouw, A. J. W. E., Nollet, F., & Bus, S. A.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2014-05-10
Volume
37
Issue
6
Pages
1697-1705
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2143906686
Cited by
282
References
2
FWCI
10.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk Factors for Plantar Foot Ulcer Recurrence in Neuropathic Diabetic Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/dc13-2470
The paper
Waaijman, R., de Haart, M., Arts, M. L. J., Wever, D., Verlouw, A. J. W. E., Nollet, F., & Bus, S. A. (2014). Risk Factors for Plantar Foot Ulcer Recurrence in Neuropathic Diabetic Patients. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc13-2470

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.