Cited by 407Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and ManagementGrowth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors

New insulin glargine 300 units · mL-1 provides a more even activity profile and prolonged glycemic control at steady state compared with insulin glargine 100 units · mL-1

Becker, Reinhard H.A., Dahmen, Raphael, Bergmann, Karin, Lehmann, Anne, Jax, Thomas, Heise, Tim·2015·Diabetes Care

Abstract

Objective To characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of a new insulin glargine comprising 300 units · mL(-1) (Gla-300), compared with insulin glargine 100 units · mL(-1) (Gla-100) at steady state in people with type 1 diabetes. Research design and methods A randomized, double-blind, crossover study (N = 30) was conducted, applying the euglycemic clamp technique over a period of 36 h. In this multiple-dose to steady-state study, participants received once-daily subcutaneous administrations of either 0.4 (cohort 1) or 0.6 units · kg(-1) (cohort 2) Gla-300 for 8 days in one treatment period and 0.4 units · kg(-1) Gla-100 for 8 days in the other. Here we focus on the results of a direct comparison between 0.4 units · kg(-1) of each treatment. PK and PD assessments performed on the last treatment day included serum insulin measurements using a radioimmunoassay and the automated euglycemic glucose clamp technique over 36 h. Results At steady state, insulin concentration (INS) and glucose infusion rate (GIR) profiles of Gla-300 were more constant and more evenly distributed over 24 h compared with those of Gla-100 and lasted longer, as supported by the later time (∼ 3 h) to 50% of the area under the serum INS and GIR time curves from time zero to 36 h post dosing. Tight blood glucose control (≤ 105 mg · dL(-1)) was maintained for approximately 5 h longer (median of 30 h) with Gla-300 compared with Gla-100. Conclusions Gla-300 provides more even steady-state…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc14-0006

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Becker, R. H. A., Dahmen, R., Bergmann, K., Lehmann, A., Jax, T., & Heise, T.
Affiliations
  • Sanofi (Germany) (DE)
  • Profil Institute for Metabolic Research (DE)
Corresponding author
Becker, Reinhard H.A.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2014-08-22
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
637-643
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W1849264946
Cited by
407
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
31.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
Keywords
insulin glargine, long-acting insulin, type 1 diabetes, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, duration of action, glycemic control, glucose infusion rate, euglycemic clamp
MeSH terms
Insulin Glargine, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Middle Aged, Time Factors, Cross-Over Studies, Insulin, Long-Acting, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review