Cited by 194Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Mortality in type 1 diabetes in the DCCT/EDIC versus the general population

Open access
The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT)/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) Study Research Group·2016·Diabetes Care

Abstract

Objective Historically, mortality in type 1 diabetes has exceeded that in the general population. We compared mortality in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) study cohort to that of the current general U.S. Research design and methods The DCCT (1983-1993) compared intensive versus conventional therapy, with HbA1c levels of ∼7 vs. 9%, respectively, over an average of 6.5 years of treatment. EDIC is the observational follow-up study of the DCCT (1994 to the present). Vital status was ascertained for 97.5% of the original DCCT cohort (n = 1,441) after a mean of 27 years follow-up. Expected mortality during DCCT/EDIC was estimated using the current age-, sex-, and race-specific risks in the general U.S. population, and the observed versus expected mortality compared using standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) and Poisson regression models. Results Mortality in the DCCT intensive therapy group was nonsignificantly lower than that in the general U.S. population (SMR = 0.88 [95% CI 0.67, 1.16]), whereas mortality in the DCCT conventional therapy group was significantly greater than that in the general population (SMR = 1.31 [95% CI 1.05, 1.65]). The SMR increased with increasing mean HbA1c, and above an HbA1c of 9%, the rate of increase in SMR among females was greater than that among males. Conclusions Overall mortality in the combined DCCT/EDIC cohort was similar to that of the general population but was…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc15-2399

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the DCCT, lower A1C with intensive management (7%) led to ≥50% reductions in microvascular complications over 6 years of treatment.

    “In this landmark trial, lower A1C with intensive management (7%) led to $50% reductions in microvascular complications over 6 years of treatment.”
  • In the DCCT, intensive therapy was associated with a higher rate of severe hypoglycemia than conventional treatment (62 compared with 19 episodes per 100 person-years of therapy).

    “However, intensive therapy was associated with a higher rate of severe hypoglycemia than conventional treatment (62 compared with 19 episodes per 100 person-years of therapy) (1).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT)/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) Study Research Group
Corresponding author
The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT)/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) Study Research Group
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2016-07-12
Volume
39
Issue
8
Pages
1378-1383
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2567623101
Cited by
194
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 4
FWCI
22.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Division of Diabetes Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U01 DK094176, U01 DK094157)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, mortality, intensive insulin therapy, conventional therapy, HbA1c, glycemic control, standardized mortality ratio, sex differences, vital status
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Insulin, Male, Risk Factors, United States, Cohort Studies, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review