Cardiometabolic disease staging predicts effectiveness of weight-loss therapy to prevent type 2 diabetes: pooled results from phase III clinical trials assessing phentermine/topiramate extended release
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of medication-assisted weight loss to prevent diabetes as a function of the baseline weighted Cardiometabolic Disease Staging (CMDS) score. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We pooled data from 3,040 overweight and obese participants in three randomized controlled trials—CONQUER, EQUIP, and SEQUEL—assessing efficacy and safety of phentermine/topiramate extended release (ER) for weight loss. In these double-blind phase III trials, overweight/obese adult patients were treated with a lifestyle intervention and randomly assigned to placebo versus once-daily oral phentermine/topiramate ER. The weighted CMDS score was calculated using baseline quantitative clinical data including waist circumference, blood glucose, blood pressure, and blood lipids. Incident diabetes was defined based on serial measures of fasting glucose, 2-h oral glucose tolerance test glucose, and/or HbA1c. RESULTS: The absolute decrease in 1-year diabetes incidence rates in subjects treated with medication versus placebo was greatest in those with high-risk CMDS scores at baseline (10.43–6.29%), intermediate in those with moderate CMDS risk (4.67–2.37%), and small in the low-risk category (1.51–0.67%). The number of participants needed to treat to prevent one new case of diabetes over a 56-week period was 24, 43, and 120 in those with baseline CMDS scores of ≥60, 30–59, and 0–29, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Numbers needed to treat to prevent one case of type 2 diabetes are markedly lower in patients with high-risk scores. CMDS can be used to quantify risk of diabetes in overweight/obese individuals and predict the effectiveness of weight-loss therapy to prevent diabetes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cardiometabolic Disease Staging uses two models: a validated categorical approach indicating that people meeting criteria for any two of impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance, or metabolic syndrome are at greatest risk of both type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, and a logistic regression equation providing quantitative 10-year risk assessment that has superior accuracy to AD
“Cardiometabolic Disease Staging is based on the number and severity of metabolic syndrome traits and employs two models: (1) a validated categorical approach indicating that persons who meet criteria for a combination of IFG, IGT, or metabolic syndrome (any 2 of the 3) are at greatest risk of both T2D and CVD,806 and (2) a logistic regression equation providing a quantitative 10-year risk assess”
From American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update. (2022) · cites this paper as [882]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 37
- Authors
- Guo, F., & Garvey, W. T.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
- University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
- Corresponding author
- Guo, Fangjian
- Garvey, W. Timothy
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2017-04-28
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 856-862
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- PMC
- PMC5481985
- OpenAlex
- W2608223794
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 2.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK-038765, P30-DK-079626)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (T32-HD-055163, K12-HD-052023)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- type 2 diabetes prevention, weight loss treatment, obesity, overweight, diabetes risk stratification, number needed to treat, lifestyle intervention, EQUIP, sequels
- MeSH terms
- Topiramate, Adult, Blood Glucose, Delayed-Action Preparations, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Double-Blind Method, Female, Fructose, Humans, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Phentermine, Weight Loss, Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic, Anti-Obesity Agents, Waist Circumference
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review