A randomized controlled trial on the safety and efficacy of exenatide therapy for the inpatient management of general medicine and surgery patients with type 2 diabetes
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: This multicenter, open-label, randomized trial examined the safety and efficacy of exenatide alone or in combination with basal insulin in non–critically ill patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 150 patients with blood glucose (BG) between 140 and 400 mg/dL, treated at home with diet, oral agents, or insulin at a total daily dose <0.5 units/kg, were randomized to exenatide alone (5 μg twice daily), exenatide plus basal insulin, or a basal-bolus insulin regimen. The primary end point was difference in mean daily BG concentration among groups. RESULTS: Mean daily BG was similar between patients treated with exenatide plus basal and a basal-bolus regimen (154 ± 39 vs. 166 ± 40 mg/dL, P = 0.31), and exenatide plus basal resulted in lower daily BG than did exenatide alone (177 ± 41 mg/dL, P = 0.02). Exenatide plus basal resulted in a higher proportion of BG levels in target range between 70 and 180 mg/dL compared with exenatide and basal-bolus (78% vs. 62% vs. 63%, respectively, P = 0.023). More patients in the exenatide and exenatide plus basal groups experienced nausea or vomiting than in the basal-bolus group (10% vs. 11% vs. 2%, P = 0.17), with three patients (6%) discontinued exenatide owing to adverse events. There were no differences in hypoglycemia <54 mg/dL (2% vs. 0% vs. 4%, P = 0.77) or length of stay (5 vs. 4 vs. 4 days, P = 0.23) among basal plus exenatide, exenatide, and basal-bolus groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this pilot study indicate that exenatide alone or in combination with basal insulin is safe and effective for the management of hospitalized general medical and surgical patients with T2D.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Data on the inpatient use of GLP-1 RAs are still mostly limited to research studies and select populations that are medically stable.
“Data on the inpatient use of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are still mostly limited to research studies and select populations that are medically stable (95,96).”
From 16. Diabetes Care in the Hospital: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [96]
Several studies compared basal insulin formulations including glargine U100, detemir U100, glargine U300, and degludec U100 and found similar glycemic control.
“Several studies have compared different basal insulin formulations, including glargine U100, insulin detemir U100, glargine U300, and degludec U100, with similar glycemic control results.92,107,1343–1346”
From American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update. (2022) · cites this paper as [1343]
The Study Procedures mention glargine or detemir as basal-insulin options, but do not compare their glycemic outcomes. The Results and Conclusions report similar glycemic control for exenatide plus basal insulin versus a basal-bolus regimen, not across basal-insulin formulations. Searches for glargine U300, degludec, and formulation comparisons found no supporting passage in our copy; page numbers were not available. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 85
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [28]28. Moghissi ES, Korytkowski MT, DiNardo M, et al.; American Association of Clinical Endo- crinologists; American Diabetes Association. American Association of Clinical Endocrinolo- gists and American Diabetes Association con- sensus statement on inpatient glycemic control. Diabetes Care 2009;32:1119-1131
- Authors
- Fayfman, M., Galindo, R. J., Rubin, D. J., Mize, D. L., Anzola, I., Urrutia, M. A., Ramos, C., Pasquel, F. J., Haw, J. S., Vellanki, P., Wang, H., Albury, B. S., Weaver, R., Cardona, S., & Umpierrez, G. E.
- Affiliations
- Emory University (US)
- Temple University (US)
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Umpierrez, Guillermo E.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2019-01-24
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 450-456
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- PMC
- PMC6905476
- OpenAlex
- W2911729520
- Cited by
- 85
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7
- FWCI
- 9.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- AstraZeneca
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
- Keywords
- exenatide, type 2 diabetes, basal insulin, multiple daily insulin injections, glycemic control, hospitalized patients, nausea and vomiting, hypoglycemia, length of hospital stay, GLP-1 receptor agonists
- MeSH terms
- Exenatide, Adult, Aged, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Inpatients, Insulin, Male, Middle Aged, Nausea, Pilot Projects, Surgery Department, Hospital, Vomiting, Treatment Outcome, Diabetes Complications, General Practice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review