Cited by 42Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and ManagementPeripheral Artery Disease ManagementDiabetes Management and Research

Racial, rural, and regional disparities in diabetes-related lower-extremity amputation rates, 2009-2017.

Open access
Akinlotan, Marvellous A., Primm, Kristin, Bolin, Jane N., Ferdinand Cheres, Abdelle L., Lee, JuSung, Callaghan, Timothy, Ferdinand, Alva O.·2021·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To examine the racial/ethnic, rural-urban, and regional variations in the trends of diabetes-related lower-extremity amputations (LEAs) among hospitalized U.S. adults from 2009 to 2017. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We used the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) (2009–2017) to identify trends in LEA rates among those primarily hospitalized for diabetes in the U.S. We conducted multivariable logistic regressions to identify individuals at risk for LEA based on race/ethnicity, census region location (North, Midwest, South, and West), and rurality of residence. RESULTS From 2009 to 2017, the rates of minor LEAs increased across all racial/ethnic, rural/urban, and census region categories. The increase in minor LEAs was driven by Native Americans (annual percent change [APC] 7.1%, P < 0.001) and Asians/Pacific Islanders (APC 7.8%, P < 0.001). Residents of non-core (APC 5.4%, P < 0.001) and large central metropolitan areas (APC 5.5%, P < 0.001) experienced the highest increases over time in minor LEA rates. Among Whites and residents of the Midwest and non-core and small metropolitan areas there was a significant increase in major LEAs. Regression findings showed that Native Americans and Hispanics were more likely to have a minor or major LEA compared with Whites. The odds of a major LEA increased with rurality and was also higher among residents of the South than among those of the Northeast. A steep decline in major–to–minor amputation ratios was observed, especially among Native Americans. CONCLUSIONS Despite increased risk of diabetes-related lower-limb amputations in underserved groups, our findings are promising when the major–to–minor amputation ratio is considered.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc20-3135

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among Medicare beneficiaries, patients identifying as non-Hispanic Black had twice the odds of lower extremity amputation within 1 year of foot ulcer diagnosis after adjusting for multiple covariates (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.93-2.03) compared with those identifying as non-Hispanic White.

    “Among Medicare beneficiaries (total sample, 643 287), patients identifying as non-Hispanic Black had twice the odds of lower extremity amputation within 1 year of foot ulcer diagnosis after adjusting for multiple covariates (odds ratio [OR], 1.98; 95% CI, 1.93-2.03;P < .001[absolute rates not provided]) compared with those identifying as non-Hispanic White.19”

    From Diabetic Foot Ulcers (2023) · cites this paper as [19]

    The 'Factors Associated With a Major Amputation' section reports higher adjusted odds for Black than White patients, but gives OR 1.12 (95% CI 1.08–1.16), not 1.98. The Abstract describes hospitalized U.S. adults in the National Inpatient Sample, not a Medicare cohort followed for one year after foot-ulcer diagnosis. Page numbers were not supplied for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Rockville, MD, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US). Accessed 8 December 2020. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK65152/
  2. Kim H-J, Fay MP, Feuer EJ, Midthune DN. Permutation tests for joinpoint regression with applications to cancer rates. Stat Med 2000;19: 335-351

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Akinlotan, M. A., Primm, K., Bolin, J. N., Ferdinand Cheres, A. L., Lee, J., Callaghan, T., & Ferdinand, A. O.
Affiliations
  • Texas A&M University (US)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • University Hospitals - Portage, Geagua and Ahuja Medical Centers Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Cleveland, OH
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio (US)
Corresponding author
Akinlotan, Marvellous A.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2021-07-22
Volume
44
Issue
9
Pages
2053-2060
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W3184903838
Cited by
42
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6
FWCI
5.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (U1CRH30040)
  • Health Resources and Services Administration
  • Office of Rural Health
  • Federal Office of Rural Health Policy
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Peripheral Artery Disease Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
racial and ethnic disparities, urban-rural differences, regional disparities, Native Americans, Hispanic Americans, hospitalization trends, underserved populations, diabetes complications
MeSH terms
Adult, Amputation, Surgical, Diabetes Mellitus, Extremities, Humans, Rural Population, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review