Cited by 41Diabetes Management and ResearchClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlDiet and metabolism studies

Controversies around the measurement of blood ketones to diagnose and manage diabetic ketoacidosis

Open access
Kilpatrick, Eric S., Butler, Alexandra E., Ostlundh, Linda, Atkin, Stephen L., Sacks, David B.·2022·Diabetes Care

Abstract

The measurement of blood ketones in preference to urine ketones has become a well-established tool in the diagnosis and management of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). However, there remains considerable disparity between diabetes guidelines regarding if, how, and when this test should be used. While recent guidelines now mainly emphasize blood measurement, several issues nonetheless remain. Many laboratories still measure blood ketones using a semiquantitative test that does not measure the predominant ketone, β-hydroxybutyrate (BOHB), which may hinder patient management. Even when BOHB is measured, the evidence for cutoffs used in DKA diagnosis or exclusion is limited, while its use in gauging severity, treatment progress, and resolution is not fully clear. Lastly, although employing point-of-care meters instead of a laboratory for BOHB measurement brings undoubted benefits, this approach has its own challenges. This article provides a perspective on these topics to complement current recommendations and to suggest how future research may improve its use in the DKA context.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc21-2279

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kilpatrick, E. S., Butler, A. E., Ostlundh, L., Atkin, S. L., & Sacks, D. B.
Affiliations
  • Manchester Royal Infirmary (GB)
  • Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland - Bahrain (BH)
  • College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2022-01-17
Volume
45
Issue
2
Pages
267-272
ISSN
0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4206613598
Cited by
41
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Diet and metabolism studies
Keywords
diabetic ketoacidosis, beta-hydroxybutyrate, urinary ketones, diabetes guidelines, ketone testing
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Ketones, Diabetic Ketoacidosis, Point-of-Care Systems, 3-Hydroxybutyric Acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review