The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Glycemic Improvement and Health Equity in the National Diabetes Prevention Program
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Despite guideline recommendations, only 3% of adults in the US with prediabetes participate in DPPs.
“Despite guideline recommendations,40 only 3% of adults in the US with prediabetes participate in DPPs.41”
From An AI-Powered Lifestyle Intervention vs Human Coaching in the Diabetes Prevention Program: A Randomized Clinical Trial (2025) · cites this paper as [40]
Community-based programs report at least 5% weight loss in 13.5% to 35.5% of participants at 12 months.
“While the original DPP reported at least 5% weight loss in 44% of participants at 12 months, community-based programs report this degree of weight loss in 13.5% to 35.5% of participants.44,45”
From An AI-Powered Lifestyle Intervention vs Human Coaching in the Diabetes Prevention Program: A Randomized Clinical Trial (2025) · cites this paper as [45]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Gruss, 2019, Public health approaches to type 2 diabetes prevention: the US National Diabetes Prevention Program and beyond, Curr Diab Rep, 19, 78, 10.1007/s11892-019-1200-z · DOI · Paper page
- Campione, 2022, Use and impact of type 2 diabetes prevention interventions, Am J Prev Med, 63, 603, 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.04.002 · DOI
- Ritchie, 2021, Patient-centered goal-setting in the National Diabetes Prevention Program: a pilot study, Diabetes Care, 44, 2464, 10.2337/dc21-0677 · DOI
- Ritchie, Patient-centered goal setting to advance health equity in diabetes prevention, ADCES Pract
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mathioudakis, N., Lalani, B., Abusamaan, M. S., Alderfer, M., Alver, D., Dobs, A., Kane, B., McGready, J., Riekert, K., Ringham, B., et al. (2025) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2025.19563 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Ritchie, N. D., Sauder, K. A., & Perreault, L.
- Affiliations
- Denver Health Medical Center (US)
- University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
- Colorado School of Public Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ritchie, Natalie D.
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2023-04-21
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- e128-e129
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- PMC
- PMC10234737
- OpenAlex
- W4366603339
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- National Institutes of Health (R01DK119478, R01DK130900, UG3HL162967)
- American Diabetes Association
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- National Diabetes Prevention Program, health equity, prediabetes, diabetes prevention, HbA1c, racial and ethnic disparities
- MeSH terms
- Health Equity, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
