Psychiatric status of diabetic youth matched with a control group
Abstract
The psychiatric status of 40 diabetic youths in good control and 40 diabetic youths in poor control was compared with the psychiatric status of a matched nondiabetic control group selected from a family practice clinic. The numbers of youths with psychiatric diagnoses, interpersonal conflicts, and noninterpersonal conflicts were determined from a semistructured psychiatric interview done by the investigator. The good-control diabetic group had significantly fewer youths with both types of conflicts when compared with the control group and the poor-control diabetic group. However, psychiatric diagnoses were made with equal frequency in all three groups. Results of a parent questionnaire concerning a youth's behavior problems revealed significant differences only for two items—“anxiety” and “depression”—which were more frequent problems for diabetic youths in poor control. The good-control diabetic group seemed to be in the best mental health, and their families were less prone to divorce. Youths in poor diabetic control were not very different psychologically from the nondiabetic control group except for the parents' report of more frequent anxiety and depression. It was speculated that these youths were more anxious because of the progression of the diabetic condition, which became less predictable as the control worsened. The low per cent of psychiatric diagnoses in the investigator's groups was in contrast to other studies. The results of the study seemed to indicate that t…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous studies produced equivocal and inconclusive findings.
“These studies have produced equivocal and inconclusive findings.”
From Risks of psychiatric disorders and suicide attempts in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a population-based cohort study (2015) · cites this paper as [10]
Previous studies on the effect of childhood type 1 diabetes on psychopathology used only small and highly selected clinical samples.
“Previous studies on the effect of childhood type 1 diabetes on the development of psychopathology have only used small and highly selected clinical samples (7–12).”
From Risks of psychiatric disorders and suicide attempts in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a population-based cohort study (2015) · cites this paper as [10]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Butwicka, A., Frisén, L., Almqvist, C., Zethelius, B., & Lichtenstein, P. (2015) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc14-0262 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
- Authors
- Simonds, J. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Missouri (US)
- Corresponding author
- Simonds, John F
- Venue
- Diabetes
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 1977-10-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 921-925
- ISSN
- 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-327X
- OpenAlex
- W2130512505
- Cited by
- 90
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diabetes (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Keywords
- pediatric diabetes, diabetic control, mental health status, anxiety, depression, interpersonal conflict, family conflict, divorce, behavioral problems, mental health
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Anxiety, Depression, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Divorce, Female, Humans, Male
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review