Cited by 124Diabetes and associated disordersT-cell and B-cell ImmunologyPancreatic function and diabetes

Spontaneous autoimmune diabetes mellitus in the BB rat

Like, Arthur A, Butler, Leonard, Williams, R Michael, Appel, Michael C, Weringer, Elora J, Rossini, Aldo A·1982·Diabetes

Abstract

The BioBreeding Rat is a recently discovered model of spontaneous diabetes mellitus. Studies to date have revealed the following characteristics of the syndrome: genetic predisposition, equal frequency and severity among males and females, absence of obesity, life sustaining requirement for insulin therapy, lymphocytic insulitis with destruction of pancreatic beta-cells, lymphocytic thyroiditis and the presence of autoantibodies to smooth muscle, thyroid colloid and other cellular antigens. Animals raised in a germ-free environment evidence diabetes with equal frequency and severity. Support for a cell-mediated autoimmune pathogenesis of the diabetic syndrome is derived from the following experiments: administration of antiserum to rat lymphocytes prevents diabetes in susceptible animals and normaliies plasma glucose levels in 36% of diabetic rats; neonatal thymectomy almost completely prevents the occurrence of diabetes. Although the BB rat may not be an appropriate model for studying the vascular complications of diabetes, peripheral nerve functional and ultrastructural defects have been reported and renal glomerular immuneglobulin deposits have been observed in long-term diabetic animals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diab.31.1.s7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The rat is particularly amenable to measurements of cognitive-behavioral, endocrine, muscle, and cardiovascular endpoints, and extensive historical data exist on physiological changes with aging.

    “The rat is particularly amendable to measurements of cognitive-behavioral, endocrine (e.g., glucose tolerance), muscle, and cardiovascular endpoints, and there is extensive historical data on physiological changes with aging [42–46].”

    From Reducing Senescent Cell Burden in Aging and Disease (2020) · cites this paper as [46]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Like, A. A., Butler, L., Williams, R. M., Appel, M. C., Weringer, E. J., & Rossini, A. A.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
Venue
Diabetes
Published
1982-04-01
Volume
31
Issue
Supplement_1
Pages
7-13
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W2329530836
Cited by
124
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
9.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
Keywords
BioBreeding rat, spontaneous diabetes mellitus, autoimmune diabetes, beta cell destruction, lymphocytic thyroiditis, autoantibodies, cell-mediated autoimmunity, thymectomy, genetic susceptibility, peripheral nerve defect, animal models of diabetes
MeSH terms
Animals, Autoimmune Diseases, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental, Disease Models, Animal, Glucose, Glycosuria, Islets of Langerhans, Rats, Inbred Strains, Thymectomy, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review