Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 181

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Discordance of Exocrine and Endocrine Growth After 90% Pancreatectomy in Rats

Brockenbrough, J Scott, Weir, Gordon C, Bonner-Weir, Susan·1988·Diabetes

Abstract

As we have previously shown, by 8 wk after 90% pancreatectomy (PX) in the rat, there is considerable regeneration of both exocrine and endocrine pancreas. In this study we examine the growth of both the exocrine and endocrine tissue 3, 7, 14, and 21 days after PX by following the pancreatic content of insulin, glucagon, and amylase as well as the mitotic indices for exocrine and islet β-cells. By 7 days the pancreatic remnant weighed more than the anatomically equivalent tissue in the sham, the remnant equivalent. The growth of the exocrine tissue and the endocrine β-cells was discordant during these initial weeks after PX, as shown by the mitotic index. The mitotic index, measured as accumulated mitotic figures after a 4-h colchicine treatment, for both the exocrine and β-cells in the sham animals was low and unchanging at the different time points (∼0.5%). At 3 and 7 days after PX, both the exocrine and β-cells had mitotic indices three- to fourfold that of the sham animals. At 14 days after PX, the exocrine cells had a slightly, albeit significantly, elevated mitotic index, whereas that of the β-cells was still double that of the shams. By 21 days there was no difference in mitotic index for exocrine tissue, but the β-cells on the PX animals had a mitotic index still double that of the shams. Another index of growth, the cell birthrate, was estimated at 7 days from the slope of regression lines of the mitotic frequency accumulated 1, 2, 3, and 4 h after colchicine. The cell birthrates of both the exocrine cells (PX 3.8 ± 0.96%, sham 0.96 ± 0.72%) and the β-cells (PX 7.2 ± 1.7%, sham 0.72 ± 0.96%) were significantly elevated in the pancreatic remnant. Thus, both exocrine cells and endocrine β-cells undergo considerable growth in the initial 3 wk after PX. However, there is discordance in their growth with respect to each other. In addition, these adult β-cells have a greater and more sustained growth than previously thought possible. The PX model could therefore become a useful model for studying the mechanisms of both exocrine and endocrine regeneration.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diab.37.2.232

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 181

Metadata

Authors
Brockenbrough, J. S., Weir, G. C., & Bonner-Weir, S.
Venue
Diabetes
Published
1988-02-01
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
232-236
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W1983101319
Cited by
181
References
0
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Discordance of Exocrine and Endocrine Growth After 90% Pancreatectomy in Rats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diab.37.2.232
The paper
Brockenbrough, J. S., Weir, G. C., & Bonner-Weir, S. (1988). Discordance of Exocrine and Endocrine Growth After 90% Pancreatectomy in Rats. Diabetes. https://doi.org/10.2337/diab.37.2.232

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.