The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Chronology and Determinants of Tissue Repair in Diabetic Lower-Extremity Ulcers
Abstract
The natural history of tissue repair and the critical determinants of faulty healing of diabetic ulcers remain obscure despite recent advances in our knowledge of the cellular physiology of normal cutaneous healing. To characterize the chronology and identify important factors affecting healing, we applied an objective method to quantify the rate of wound healing of full-thickness lower-extremity ulcers in 46 diabetic outpatients who received local wound care under a standardized clinical protocol. The initial ulcer healing rate, eventual status of tissue repair, and definitive clinical outcome were not significantly associated with age; diabetes type, duration, or treatment; level or change in glycosylated hemoglobin; current smoking; presence of sensory neuropathy; ulcer location or class; initial infection; or frequency of recurrent infections. However, direct measures of local cutaneous perfusion, estimated by periwound measurements of transcutaneous O2 tension (TcPo2) and transcutaneous CO2 tension (TcPco2), were significantly associated with the initial rate of tissue repair (P = 0.003 and 0.005, respectively). The strong prediction of early healing by these parameters of local skin perfusion was independent from the effects of segmental Doppler arterial blood pressure at the dorsalis pedis, although eventual ulcer reepithelialization was significantly related to foot blood pressure and periwound TcPo2 and TcPco2. We conclude that periwound cutaneous perfusion is the critical physiological determinant of diabetic ulcer healing, indicating a 39-fold increased risk of early healing failure when the average periwound TcPo2 is <20 mmHg.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
PERSPECTIVE ARTICLE: Growth factors and cytokines in wound healing
Barrientos, S., Stojadinovic, O., Golinko, M. S., Brem, H., & Tomic‐Canic, M. (2008) · Wound Repair and Regeneration · doi:10.1111/j.1524-475x.2008.00410.x · Cited by 3,583
Wound healing and its impairment in the diabetic foot
Falanga, V. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67700-8 · Cited by 2,639
Risk Factors for Foot Infections in Individuals With Diabetes
Lavery, L. A., Armstrong, D. G., Wunderlich, R. P., Mohler, M. J., Wendel, C. S., & Lipsky, B. A. (2006) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc05-2425 · Cited by 787
Hingorani, A., LaMuraglia, G. M., Henke, P., Meissner, M. H., Loretz, L., Zinszer, K. M., Driver, V. R., Frykberg, R., Carman, T. L., Marston, W., et al. (2016) · Journal of Vascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2015.10.003 · Cited by 641
Dowd, S. E., Wolcott, R. D., Sun, Y., McKeehan, T., Smith, E., & Rhoads, D. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003326 · Cited by 481
Metadata
- Authors
- Pecoraro, R. E., Ahroni, J. H., Boyko, E. J., & Stensel, V. L.
- Venue
- Diabetes
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 1991-10-01
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1305-1313
- ISSN
- 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-327X
- OpenAlex
- W2060411441
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chronology and Determinants of Tissue Repair in Diabetic Lower-Extremity Ulcers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diab.40.10.1305
- The paper
- Pecoraro, R. E., Ahroni, J. H., Boyko, E. J., & Stensel, V. L. (1991). Chronology and Determinants of Tissue Repair in Diabetic Lower-Extremity Ulcers. Diabetes. https://doi.org/10.2337/diab.40.10.1305
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.