Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 546

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Evidence for Distinctive and Intrinsic Defects in Insulin Action in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

Dunaif, Andrea, Segal, Karen R, Shelley, Donna R, Green, Georgette, Dobrjansky, Areta, Licholai, Teresa·1992·Diabetes

Abstract

Women with PCO have a unique but poorly characterized disorder of insulin action. Obese (n = 16) and nonobese (n = 14) PCO women and age- and weight-matched normal, nondiabetic ovulatory women (obese, n = 15; nonobese, n = 17) had insulin action determined in vivo with sequential multiple insulin dose euglycemic clamps and in isolated abdominal adipocytes to clarify the mechanisms of insulin resistance. PCO resulted in significant increases in the ED50 insulin for glucose utilization in vivo (P < 0.001) and in adipocytes (P < 0.01), without significant changes in adipocyte insulin-binding sites. PCO also resulted in significant decreases in maximal insulin-stimulated rates of glucose utilization in vivo (P < 0.01) and in adipocytes (P < 0.01). Obesity resulted in smaller decreases in insulin sensitivity than PCO (ED50 insulin, P < 0.001 in vivo and P < 0.05 in adipocytes), but greater decreases in insulin responsiveness (Vmax P < 0.001 in vivo and in adipocytes). The ED50 insulin for suppression of HGP was increased only in obese PCO women (P < 0.001), and the interactions between PCO and obesity on this parameter were statistically significant. No significant correlations between androgen or estrogen levels and adipocyte insulin binding or action were found. Because insulin binding was not changed, we conclude that the major lesion causing insulin resistance in PCO is a striking decrease in insulin sensitivity secondary to a defect in the insulin receptor and/or postreceptor signal transduction. PCO also is associated with modest but significant decreases in glucose transport. These defects in insulin action appear to represent intrinsic abnormalities that are independent of obesity, metabolic derangements, body fat topography, and sex hormone levels. Conversely, changes in hepatic insulin sensitivity appear to be acquired with obesity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diab.41.10.1257

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 546

Metadata

Authors
Dunaif, A., Segal, K. R., Shelley, D. R., Green, G., Dobrjansky, A., & Licholai, T.
Venue
Diabetes
Published
1992-10-01
Volume
41
Issue
10
Pages
1257-1266
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W2144817422
Cited by
546
References
0
FWCI
6.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence for Distinctive and Intrinsic Defects in Insulin Action in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diab.41.10.1257
The paper
Dunaif, A., Segal, K. R., Shelley, D. R., Green, G., Dobrjansky, A., & Licholai, T. (1992). Evidence for Distinctive and Intrinsic Defects in Insulin Action in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Diabetes. https://doi.org/10.2337/diab.41.10.1257

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.