The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Insulin Lispro in CSII: Results of a Double-Blind Crossover Study
Abstract
Insulin lispro is a human insulin analog that dissociates more rapidly than human regular insulin after subcutaneous injection, resulting in higher insulin levels at an earlier point in time and a shorter duration of action. The aim of the study was to evaluate if this pharmacokinetic difference would translate into better postprandial and overall control in 30 IDDM patients (age, 35.1 ± 1.5 years; male-female ratio, 17:13; BMI, 24.8 ± 0.5 kg/m2; HbA1c, 8.03 ± 0.13% at baseline) treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII; Disetronic H-TRON V100) in a double-blind crossover clinical study. Patients were randomized to insulin lispro or human regular insulin for 3 months before crossing over to the other insulin for another 3 months. All meal boluses were given immediately before breakfast, lunch, and supper. An eight-point blood glucose profile was measured once weekly, and HbA1c levels were measured monthly. At the end of the 3-month treatment period, HbA1c levels were significantly lower with insulin lispro, compared with human regular insulin: 7.66 ± 0.13 vs. 8.00 ± 0.16% (P = 0.0041). While preprandial, bedtime, and 2:00 A.M. values for blood glucose were not significantly different, 1-h postprandial blood glucose was significantly improved after breakfast, lunch, and dinner with insulin lispro, compared with human regular insulin: 8.35 vs. 9.79 mmol/l (P = 0.006), 7.58 vs. 8.74 mmol/l (P = 0.049), and 7.85 vs. 9.01 mmol/l (P = 0.03). The incidence of hypoglycemia per 30 days (blood glucose levels, <3.0 mmol/l) was 8.4 ± 1.3 before randomization, decreasing to 6.0 ± 0.9 for insulin lispro and to 7.6 ± 1.3 for regular insulin during the last month of the study. Two patients in each group reported insulin precipitation. We conclude that insulin lispro improves glycemic control in CSII without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 190: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
(2018) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002501 · Cited by 1,820
Management of diabetes and hyperglycemia in hospitals.
Clement, S., Braithwaite, S. S., Magee, M. F., Ahmann, A., Smith, E. P., Schafer, R. G., Hirsch, I. B., & on behalf of the Diabetes in Hospitals Writing Committee (2004) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.27.2.553 · Cited by 1,266
Hirsch, I. B. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra040832 · Cited by 667
Outpatient Insulin Therapy in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Scientific Review
DeWitt, D. E., & Hirsch, I. B. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.17.2254 · Cited by 502
Practice Bulletin No. 180: gestational diabetes mellitus.
(2017) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002159 · Cited by 324
Metadata
- Authors
- Zinman, B., Tildesley, H., Chiasson, J.-L., Tsui, E., & Strack, T.
- Venue
- Diabetes
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 1997-03-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 440-450
- ISSN
- 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-327X
- OpenAlex
- W2150944287
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Insulin Lispro in CSII: Results of a Double-Blind Crossover Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diab.46.3.440
- The paper
- Zinman, B., Tildesley, H., Chiasson, J.-L., Tsui, E., & Strack, T. (1997). Insulin Lispro in CSII: Results of a Double-Blind Crossover Study. Diabetes. https://doi.org/10.2337/diab.46.3.440
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.