Failure of physiological plasma glucose excursions to entrain high-frequency pulsatile insulin secretion in type 2 diabetes.
Open accessAbstract
Insulin is released in high-frequency pulsatile bursts at intervals of 6-13 min. Intrapancreatic mechanisms are assumed to coordinate pulsatile insulin release, but small oscillations in plasma glucose concentrations may contribute further. To gain additional insight into beta-cell (patho)physiology, we explored the ability of repetitive small glucose infusions (6 mg/kg over 1 min every 10 min) to modify rapid pulsatile insulin secretion in 10 type 2 diabetic individuals (plasma glucose 9.3 +/- 1.0 mmol/l, HbA1c 7.9 +/- 0.5%, mean +/- SE) and 10 healthy subjects. All subjects were investigated twice in randomly assigned order: during saline and during glucose exposure. Blood was collected every minute for 90 min to create a plasma insulin concentration time-series for analysis using 3 complementary algorithms: namely, spectral analysis, autocorrelation analysis, and approximate entropy (ApEn). During saline infusion, none of the algorithms were able to discriminate between diabetic and control subjects (P > 0.20). During glucose entrainment, spectral density peaks (SP) and autocorrelation coefficients (AC) increased significantly (P < 0.001), and ApEn decreased (P < 0.01), indicating more regular insulin time-series in the healthy volunteers. However, no differences were observed in the diabetic individuals between the glucose and saline conditions. Furthermore, in spite of identical absolute glucose excursions (approximately 0.3 mmol/l) glucose pulse entrainment led to a complete (SP: 4.76 +/- 0.62 [range 2.08-7.60] vs. 17.24 +/- 0.93 [11.70-20.58], P < 0.001; AC: 0.01 +/- 0.05 [0.33-0.24] vs. 0.64 +/- 0.05 [0.35-0.83], P < 0.001) or almost complete (ApEn: 1.59 +/- 0.02 [1.48-1.67] vs. 1.42 +/- 0.05 [1.26-1.74], P < 0.005) separation of the insulin time-series in diabetic and control subjects. Even elevating the glucose infusion rate in the diabetic subjects to achieve comparable relative (and hence higher absolute) glucose excursions (approximately 4.9%) failed to entrain pulsatile insulin secretion in this group. In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that failure to respond adequately with regular oscillatory insulin secretion to recurrent high-frequency and (near)-physiological glucose excursion is a manifest feature of beta-cell malfunction in type 2 diabetes. Whether the model will be useful in unmasking subtle (possible prediabetic) defects in beta-cell sensitivity to glucose drive remains to be determined.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Plasma insulin oscillations are less apparent in patients with T2DM.
“These oscillations are less apparent in patients with T2DM (285, 483).”
From Pancreatic β-Cell Electrical Activity and Insulin Secretion: Of Mice and Men (2018) · cites this paper as [285]
The Serum insulin and plasma glucose concentrations section reports much smaller insulin oscillations in participants with type 2 diabetes during glucose entrainment. But during saline administration, oscillatory peaks were comparable between groups. The unqualified claim extends the finding beyond the condition in which the difference was observed. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Ehrmann, D. A., Sturis, J., Byrne, M. M., Karrison, T., Rosenfield, R. L., & Polonsky, K. S. (1995) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci118064 · Cited by 426 · see citing works
Self-citationVaag, A., Henriksen, J. E., Madsbad, S., Holm, N., & Beck-Nielsen, H. (1995) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci117715 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
SIMON, C., BRANDENBERGER, G., & FOLLENIUS, M. (1987) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem-64-4-669 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
O'Meara, N. M., Sturis, J., Van Cauter, E., & Polonsky, K. S. (1993) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci116560 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pancreatic β-Cell Electrical Activity and Insulin Secretion: Of Mice and Men
Rorsman, P., & Ashcroft, F. M. (2018) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00008.2017 · Cited by 793 · see citing works
Diabetes: Models, Signals, and Control
Cobelli, C., Dalla Man, C., Sparacino, G., Magni, L., De Nicolao, G., & Kovatchev, B. P. (2009) · IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/rbme.2009.2036073 · Cited by 511 · see citing works
The cell biology of systemic insulin function
Tokarz, V. L., MacDonald, P. E., & Klip, A. (2018) · Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201802095 · Cited by 471 · see citing works
“…β-cells (Ferdaoussi and MacDonald, 2017; Gandasi et al., 2017) and impaired pulsatile secretion of insulin in diabetic individuals (Lang et al., 1981; Hollingdal et al., 2000; Laedtke et al., 2000) • Reduced hepatic insulin clearance (Jung et al., 2018) and CEA CAM1 expression (Lee, 2011) in…”
BackgroundPulsatile Portal Vein Insulin Delivery Enhances Hepatic Insulin Action and Signaling
Matveyenko, A. V., Liuwantara, D., Gurlo, T., Kirakossian, D., Dalla Man, C., Cobelli, C., White, M. F., Copps, K. D., Volpi, E., Fujita, S., et al. (2012) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/db11-1462 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hollingdal, M., Juhl, C. B., Pincus, S. M., Sturis, J., Veldhuis, J. D., Polonsky, K. S., Pørksen, N., & Schmitz, O.
- Affiliations
- Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
- Venue
- Diabetes
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2000-08-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1334-1340
- ISSN
- 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-327X
- OpenAlex
- W2121517988
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Diabetes (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Novo Nordisk
- Diabetesforeningen
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Keywords
- type 2 diabetes, pulsatile insulin secretion, beta-cell function, approximate entropy, spectral analysis, autocorrelation
- MeSH terms
- Insulin Secretion, Algorithms, Blood Glucose, C-Peptide, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Fatty Acids, Nonesterified, Female, Glucose, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Infusions, Intravenous, Insulin, Male, Middle Aged, Reference Values, Time Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review