Cited by 71Pancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and Management

Failure of physiological plasma glucose excursions to entrain high-frequency pulsatile insulin secretion in type 2 diabetes.

Open access
Hollingdal, M, Juhl, C B, Pincus, S M, Sturis, J, Veldhuis, J D, Polonsky, K S, Pørksen, N, Schmitz, O·2000·Diabetes

Abstract

Insulin is released in high-frequency pulsatile bursts at intervals of 6-13 min. Intrapancreatic mechanisms are assumed to coordinate pulsatile insulin release, but small oscillations in plasma glucose concentrations may contribute further. To gain additional insight into beta-cell (patho)physiology, we explored the ability of repetitive small glucose infusions (6 mg/kg over 1 min every 10 min) to modify rapid pulsatile insulin secretion in 10 type 2 diabetic individuals (plasma glucose 9.3 +/- 1.0 mmol/l, HbA1c 7.9 +/- 0.5%, mean +/- SE) and 10 healthy subjects. All subjects were investigated twice in randomly assigned order: during saline and during glucose exposure. Blood was collected every minute for 90 min to create a plasma insulin concentration time-series for analysis using 3 complementary algorithms: namely, spectral analysis, autocorrelation analysis, and approximate entropy (ApEn). During saline infusion, none of the algorithms were able to discriminate between diabetic and control subjects (P > 0.20). During glucose entrainment, spectral density peaks (SP) and autocorrelation coefficients (AC) increased significantly (P < 0.001), and ApEn decreased (P < 0.01), indicating more regular insulin time-series in the healthy volunteers. However, no differences were observed in the diabetic individuals between the glucose and saline conditions. Furthermore, in spite of identical absolute glucose excursions (approximately 0.3 mmol/l) glucose pulse entrainment led to a complete (SP: 4.76 +/- 0.62 [range 2.08-7.60] vs. 17.24 +/- 0.93 [11.70-20.58], P < 0.001; AC: 0.01 +/- 0.05 [0.33-0.24] vs. 0.64 +/- 0.05 [0.35-0.83], P < 0.001) or almost complete (ApEn: 1.59 +/- 0.02 [1.48-1.67] vs. 1.42 +/- 0.05 [1.26-1.74], P < 0.005) separation of the insulin time-series in diabetic and control subjects. Even elevating the glucose infusion rate in the diabetic subjects to achieve comparable relative (and hence higher absolute) glucose excursions (approximately 4.9%) failed to entrain pulsatile insulin secretion in this group. In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that failure to respond adequately with regular oscillatory insulin secretion to recurrent high-frequency and (near)-physiological glucose excursion is a manifest feature of beta-cell malfunction in type 2 diabetes. Whether the model will be useful in unmasking subtle (possible prediabetic) defects in beta-cell sensitivity to glucose drive remains to be determined.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diabetes.49.8.1334

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Plasma insulin oscillations are less apparent in patients with T2DM.

    “These oscillations are less apparent in patients with T2DM (285, 483).”

    From Pancreatic β-Cell Electrical Activity and Insulin Secretion: Of Mice and Men (2018) · cites this paper as [285]

    The Serum insulin and plasma glucose concentrations section reports much smaller insulin oscillations in participants with type 2 diabetes during glucose entrainment. But during saline administration, oscillatory peaks were comparable between groups. The unqualified claim extends the finding beyond the condition in which the difference was observed. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hollingdal, M., Juhl, C. B., Pincus, S. M., Sturis, J., Veldhuis, J. D., Polonsky, K. S., Pørksen, N., & Schmitz, O.
Affiliations
Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
Venue
Diabetes
Published
2000-08-01
Volume
49
Issue
8
Pages
1334-1340
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W2121517988
Cited by
71
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Diabetesforeningen
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, pulsatile insulin secretion, beta-cell function, approximate entropy, spectral analysis, autocorrelation
MeSH terms
Insulin Secretion, Algorithms, Blood Glucose, C-Peptide, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Fatty Acids, Nonesterified, Female, Glucose, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Infusions, Intravenous, Insulin, Male, Middle Aged, Reference Values, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review