Cited by 157Diabetes and associated disordersDiabetes Management and ResearchPancreatic function and diabetes

The Discovery of Type 1 Diabetes

Open access
Gale, Edwin A.M.·2001·Diabetes

Abstract

The etiological heterogeneity of idiopathic diabetes has been recognized for 25 years, and subdivision into type 1 and type 2 diabetes is fundamental to the way we think about the disease. Review of the literature suggests that the concept of type 1 diabetes as an immunemediated disease emerged rapidly over the period from 1974 to 1976 and showed many of the features of a classic paradigm shift. A few key observations triggered recognition and acceptance of the new paradigm, but the necessary context was provided by scientific developments in areas mainly unrelated to diabetes. The disease paradigm established by 1976 is still widely accepted, and its essential features have been modified only in detail by the revolution in molecular biology that has occurred over the intervening period. Notwithstanding, some of the underlying assumptions remain imprecise, unchallenged, or unconfirmed. Appreciation of the historical origin and subsequent evolution of these fundamental concepts could stimulate critical analysis and help prepare the way for a new paradigm.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diabetes.50.2.217

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • By the end of the 1970s, work led to recognition that immune-mediated loss of insulin-secreting cells was the cause of insulin-dependent diabetes.

    “By the end of the 1970s, this work led to the recognition that immune-mediated loss of insulin-secreting cells was the cause of insulin-dependent diabetes3.”

    From 100 years of insulin: celebrating the past, present and future of diabetes therapy (2021) · cites this paper as [3]

    In “The Road to Autoimmune Diabetes” (page unavailable), Gale describes evidence that converged on an autoimmune paradigm during the 1970s, and “Animal Models of Diabetes” describes immune-mediated models developed in 1976. But the latter section also says viral infection was still thought to account for many cases and describes both immune-mediated and non-immune-mediated forms of type 1 diabetes. The claim overstates the paper by presenting immune-mediated cell loss as the established cause of all insulin-dependent diabetes by the end of the decade. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Franco Bottazzo was the first to successfully visualize islet cell antibodies using indirect immunofluorescence, confirming the presence of antibodies reactive to the islet.

    “In a now famous ‘eureka’ moment, in 1974, Franco Bottazzo, a research fellow in Deborah Doniach’s laboratory in London, was the first to successfully visualize islet cell antibodies using indirect immunofluorescence, thereby confirming the presence of antibodies reactive to the islet.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Kuhn TS: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago, Univer- sity of Chicago Press, 1970
  2. Wells HG: Addison's disease with selective destruction of the suprarenal cor- tex. Arch Pathol 10:499-523, 1930
  3. Sexton C: The Seeds of Time: The Life of Sir Macfarlane Burnet. Oxford, U.K., Oxford University Press, 1991
  4. Renold AE, Soeldner JS, Steinke J: Immunological studies with homolo- gous and heterologous pancreatic insulin in the cow. In Ciba Foundation Col- loquia: Aetiology of Diabetes and Its Complications. Vol. 15. London, Churchill, 1964, p. 122-139
  5. Williams RH, Ed. Philadelphia, W.B. Saunders, 1974, p. 502-626
  6. Burnet M: Self and Not-Self. Cambridge, U.K., Cambridge University Press, 1969 101.
  7. Weatherall D: Science and the Quiet Art: Medical Research and Patient Care. Oxford, U.K., Oxford University Press, 1995 104.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gale, E. A. M.
Affiliations
University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
Gale, Edwin A.M.
Venue
Diabetes
Published
2001-02-01
Volume
50
Issue
2
Pages
217-226
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W2094929545
Cited by
157
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, etiologic heterogeneity, immunological etiology, history of diabetes research
MeSH terms
Animals, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Disease Models, Animal, Endocrinology, Humans, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, History, 19th Century, History, 20th Century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review