Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 173

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recombinant Human Erythropoietin Stimulates Angiogenesis and Wound Healing in the Genetically Diabetic Mouse

Open access
Galeano, Mariarosaria, Altavilla, Domenica, Cucinotta, Domenico, Russo, Giuseppina T., Calò, Margherita, Bitto, Alessandra, Marini, Herbert, Marini, Rolando, Adamo, Elena B., Seminara, Paolo, Minutoli, Letteria, Torre, Valerio, Squadrito, Francesco·2004·Diabetes

Abstract

The effects of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) in diabetes-related healing defects were investigated by using an incisional skin-wound model produced on the back of female diabetic C57BL/KsJ-m+/+Leptdb mice (db+/db+) and their normoglycemic littermates (db+/+m). Animals were treated with rHuEPO (400 units/kg in 100 μl s.c.) or its vehicle alone (100 μl). Mice were killed on different days (3, 6, and 12 days after skin injury) for measurement of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) mRNA expression and protein synthesis, for monitoring angiogenesis by CD31 expression, and for evaluating histological changes. Furthermore, we evaluated wound-breaking strength at day 12. At day 6, rHuEPO injection in diabetic mice resulted in an increase in VEGF mRNA expression (vehicle = 0.33 ± 0.1 relative amount of mRNA; rHuEPO = 0.9 ± 0.09 relative amount of mRNA; P < 0.05) and protein wound content (vehicle = 23 ± 5 pg/wound; rHuEPO = 92 ± 12 pg/wound; P < 0.05) and caused a marked increase in CD31 gene expression (vehicle = 0.18 ± 0.05 relative amount of mRNA; rHuEPO = 0.98 ± 0.21 relative amount of mRNA; P < 0.05) and protein synthesis. Furthermore, rHuEPO injection improved the impaired wound healing and, at day 12, increased the wound-breaking strength in diabetic mice (vehicle = 12 ± 2 g/mm; rHuEPO 21 ± 5 g/mm; P < 0.05). Erythropoietin may have a potential application in diabetes-related wound disorders.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diabetes.53.9.2509

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 173

Metadata

Authors
Galeano, M., Altavilla, D., Cucinotta, D., Russo, G. T., Calò, M., Bitto, A., Marini, H., Marini, R., Adamo, E. B., Seminara, P., Minutoli, L., Torre, V., & Squadrito, F.
Venue
Diabetes
Published
2004-09-01
Volume
53
Issue
9
Pages
2509-2517
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W2101004964
Cited by
173
References
2
FWCI
4.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recombinant Human Erythropoietin Stimulates Angiogenesis and Wound Healing in the Genetically Diabetic Mouse. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diabetes.53.9.2509
The paper
Galeano, M., Altavilla, D., Cucinotta, D., Russo, G. T., Calò, M., Bitto, A., Marini, H., Marini, R., Adamo, E. B., Seminara, P., Minutoli, L., Torre, V., & Squadrito, F. (2004). Recombinant Human Erythropoietin Stimulates Angiogenesis and Wound Healing in the Genetically Diabetic Mouse. Diabetes. https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.53.9.2509

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.