Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 403

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Considerations in the Design of Hyperinsulinemic-Euglycemic Clamps in the Conscious Mouse

Ayala, Julio E., Bracy, Deanna P., McGuinness, Owen P., Wasserman, David H.·2006·Diabetes

Abstract

Despite increased use of the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp to study insulin action in mice, the effects of experimental parameters on the results obtained have not been addressed. In our studies, we determined the influences of sampling sites, fasting duration, and insulin delivery on results obtained from clamps in conscious mice. Carotid artery and jugular vein catheters were implanted in C57BL/6J mice (n = 6–10/group) fed a normal diet for sampling and infusions. After a 5-day recovery period, mice underwent a 120-min clamp (2.5-mU · kg−1 · min−1 insulin infusion; ∼120–130 mg/dl glucose) while receiving [3-3H]glucose to determine glucose appearance (endoRa) and disappearance (Rd). Sampling large volumes (∼100 μl) from the cut tail resulted in elevated catecholamines and basal glucose compared with artery sampling. Catecholamines were not elevated when taking small samples (∼ 5 μl) from the cut tail. Overnight (18-h) fasting resulted in greater loss of total body, lean, and fat masses and hepatic glycogen but resulted in enhanced insulin sensitivity compared with 5-h fasting. Compared with a 16-mU/kg insulin prime, a 300-mU/kg prime resulted in hepatic insulin resistance and slower acquisition of steady-state glucose infusion rates (GIR) after a 5-h fast. The steady-state GIR was expedited after the 300-mU/kg prime in 18-h–fasted mice. The GIR and Rd rose with increasing insulin infusions (0.8, 2.5, 4, and 20 mU · kg−1 · min−1), but endoRa was fully suppressed with doses higher than 0.8 mU · kg−1 · min−1. Thus, common variations in experimental factors yield different results and should be considered in designing and interpreting clamps.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diabetes.55.02.06.db05-0686

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Cited by

See all 403

Metadata

Authors
Ayala, J. E., Bracy, D. P., McGuinness, O. P., & Wasserman, D. H.
Venue
Diabetes
Published
2006-02-01
Volume
55
Issue
2
Pages
390-397
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W2153302582
Cited by
403
References
11
FWCI
11.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Considerations in the Design of Hyperinsulinemic-Euglycemic Clamps in the Conscious Mouse. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diabetes.55.02.06.db05-0686
The paper
Ayala, J. E., Bracy, D. P., McGuinness, O. P., & Wasserman, D. H. (2006). Considerations in the Design of Hyperinsulinemic-Euglycemic Clamps in the Conscious Mouse. Diabetes. https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.55.02.06.db05-0686

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.