Cited by 78Diabetes Management and ResearchFood composition and propertiesDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Factors Affecting Interpretation of Postprandial Glucose and Insulin Areas

Gannon, Mary C, Nuttall, Frank Q·1987·Diabetes Care

Abstract

Recently there has been an increased interest in determining the circulating glucose concentration after the ingestion of various individual foods and mixed meals. The purpose of these determinations is to systematically rank foods with respect to their quantitative effect on postmeal glucose concentration. Potentially such data could be useful in designing a diet for individuals with diabetes. We believe this concept is good. However, several factors that may affect interpretation of the data used to develop this ranking need to be considered before the utility of this approach to dietary management can be assessed: 1) duration of time over which the data are collected and analyzed; 2) use of absolute versus incremental areas in the determinations; 3) inclusion or exclusion of negative areas if incremental areas are used; 4) differences in response to a given food in males compared with females; 5) severity of diabetes; 6) confounding effects of oral agents or insulin treatment; 7) reproducibility of data; 8) differences in collection of blood sample; 9) food composition, processing, and preparation; 10) the dose-response relationship to ingestion of a given carbohydrate; 11) the meal being studied, i.e., first, second, or third meal of the day; and 12) a possible effect of the composition of the previous meal, if the response is tested to any meal other than the first meal of the day.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diacare.10.6.759

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For legumes, RGR markedly increased as length of blood sampling increased.

    “For legumes, the RGR markedly increased as the length of time of blood sampling increased.”

    From Glycaemic index methodology (2005) · cites this paper as Gannon & Nuttal (1987)

  • After sucrose, milk and fructose, RGR markedly decreased as length of blood sampling increased.

    “After sucrose, milk and fructose, the RGR markedly decreased as the length of time over which blood was sampled increased, presumably because blood glucose concentrations after these test meals undershot more than after glucose.”

    From Glycaemic index methodology (2005) · cites this paper as Gannon & Nuttal (1987)

  • For starchy foods such as bread, oats and potato, there was only a small effect of time of blood sampling on RGR.

    “For starchy foods such as bread, oats and potato, there was only a small effect of time of blood sampling on RGR.”

    From Glycaemic index methodology (2005) · cites this paper as Gannon & Nuttal (1987)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gannon, M. C., & Nuttall, F. Q.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
1987-11-01
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
759-763
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2035828485
Cited by
78
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
postprandial blood glucose, insulin response, glycemic index, mixed meal, diabetic diet, sex differences, oral antidiabetic drugs, insulin therapy, reproducibility, dose-response relationship
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diet, Diabetic, Eating, Female, Humans, Insulin, Male, Reference Values, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review