Factors Affecting Interpretation of Postprandial Glucose and Insulin Areas
Abstract
Recently there has been an increased interest in determining the circulating glucose concentration after the ingestion of various individual foods and mixed meals. The purpose of these determinations is to systematically rank foods with respect to their quantitative effect on postmeal glucose concentration. Potentially such data could be useful in designing a diet for individuals with diabetes. We believe this concept is good. However, several factors that may affect interpretation of the data used to develop this ranking need to be considered before the utility of this approach to dietary management can be assessed: 1) duration of time over which the data are collected and analyzed; 2) use of absolute versus incremental areas in the determinations; 3) inclusion or exclusion of negative areas if incremental areas are used; 4) differences in response to a given food in males compared with females; 5) severity of diabetes; 6) confounding effects of oral agents or insulin treatment; 7) reproducibility of data; 8) differences in collection of blood sample; 9) food composition, processing, and preparation; 10) the dose-response relationship to ingestion of a given carbohydrate; 11) the meal being studied, i.e., first, second, or third meal of the day; and 12) a possible effect of the composition of the previous meal, if the response is tested to any meal other than the first meal of the day.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For legumes, RGR markedly increased as length of blood sampling increased.
“For legumes, the RGR markedly increased as the length of time of blood sampling increased.”
From Glycaemic index methodology (2005) · cites this paper as Gannon & Nuttal (1987)
After sucrose, milk and fructose, RGR markedly decreased as length of blood sampling increased.
“After sucrose, milk and fructose, the RGR markedly decreased as the length of time over which blood was sampled increased, presumably because blood glucose concentrations after these test meals undershot more than after glucose.”
From Glycaemic index methodology (2005) · cites this paper as Gannon & Nuttal (1987)
For starchy foods such as bread, oats and potato, there was only a small effect of time of blood sampling on RGR.
“For starchy foods such as bread, oats and potato, there was only a small effect of time of blood sampling on RGR.”
From Glycaemic index methodology (2005) · cites this paper as Gannon & Nuttal (1987)
Cites
Collier, G., & O'Dea, K. (1983) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/37.6.941 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Nuttall, F. Q., Gannon, M. C., Wald, J. L., & Ahmed, M. (1985) · Journal of the American College of Nutrition · doi:10.1080/07315724.1985.10720086 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Self-citationA minimal-model-based glucose clamp yielding insulin sensitivity independent of glycemia
Pacini, G., Finegood, D. T., & Bergman, R. N. (1982) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/diab.31.5.432 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The glycemic index: methodology and clinical implications
Wolever, T., Jenkins, D., Jenkins, A., & Josse, R. (1991) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/54.5.846 · Cited by 1,168 · see citing works
Brouns, F., Bjorck, I., Frayn, K. N., Gibbs, A. L., Lang, V., Slama, G., & Wolever, T. M. S. (2005) · Nutrition Research Reviews · doi:10.1079/nrr2005100 · Cited by 1,061 · see citing works
Plasma glucose and insulin response to macronutrients in nondiabetic and NIDDM subjects
Nuttall, F. Q., & Gannon, M. C. (1991) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.14.9.824 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Individual variations in glycemic responses to carbohydrates and underlying metabolic physiology
Wu, Y., Ehlert, B., Metwally, A. A., Perelman, D., Park, H., Brooks, A. W., Abbasi, F., Michael, B., Celli, A., Bejikian, C., et al. (2025) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-025-03719-2 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Torsdottir, I., & Andersson, H. (1989) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/bf00285289 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Wolever, T. M., Zurbau, A., Koecher, K., & Au-Yeung, F. (2024) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.07.011 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gannon, M. C., & Nuttall, F. Q.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- ORCID
- Gannon, Mary C
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 1987-11-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 759-763
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2035828485
- Cited by
- 78
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- postprandial blood glucose, insulin response, glycemic index, mixed meal, diabetic diet, sex differences, oral antidiabetic drugs, insulin therapy, reproducibility, dose-response relationship
- MeSH terms
- Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diet, Diabetic, Eating, Female, Humans, Insulin, Male, Reference Values, Time Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review