The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Total Contact Casting in Treatment of Diabetic Plantar Ulcers: Controlled Clinical Trial
Abstract
This study compared the treatment of total contact casting (TCC) with traditional dressing treatment (TDT) in the management of diabetic plantar ulcers. Forty patients with diabetes mellitus and a plantar ulcer but with nogross infection, osteomyelitis, or gangrene were randomly assigned to the TCC group (n = 21) or TDT group (n = 19). Age, sex, ratio of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus to non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, duration of diabetes mellitus, vascular status, size and duration of ulcer, and sensation were not significantly different between groups (P > .05). In the experimental group, TCC was applied on the initial visit, and subjects were instructed to limit ambulation to ∼33% of their usual activity. Subjects in the control group were prescribed dressing changes and accommodative footwear and were instructed to avoid bearing weight on the involved extremity. Ulcers were considered healed if they showed complete skin closure with no drainage. Ulcers were considered not healed if they showed no decrease in size by 6 wk or if infection developed that required hospitalization. In the TCC group, 19 of 21 ulcers healed in 42 ± 29 days; in the TDT group, 6 of 19 ulcers healed in 65 ± 29 days. Significantly more ulcers healed (χ2 = 12.4, P < .05) and fewer infections developed (χ2 = 4.1, P < .05) in the TCC group. We conclude TCC is a successful method of treating diabetic plantar ulcers but requires careful application, close follow-up, and patient compliance with scheduled appointments to minimize complications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wound Microbiology and Associated Approaches to Wound Management
Bowler, P. G., Duerden, B. I., & Armstrong, D. G. (2001) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.14.2.244-269.2001 · Cited by 1,634
Prompers, L., Huijberts, M., Apelqvist, J., Jude, E., Piaggesi, A., Bakker, K., Edmonds, M., Holstein, P., Jirkovska, A., Mauricio, D., et al. (2007) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-006-0491-1 · Cited by 1,023
EFFECT OF ACHILLES TENDON LENGTHENING ON NEUROPATHIC PLANTAR ULCERS☆: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL
MUELLER, M. J., SINACORE, D. R., HASTINGS, M. K., STRUBE, M. J., & JOHNSON, J. E. (2003) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume · doi:10.2106/00004623-200308000-00003 · Cited by 353
Self-citationLazzarini, P. A., Armstrong, D. G., Crews, R. T., Gooday, C., Jarl, G., Kirketerp‐Moller, K., Viswanathan, V., & Bus, S. A. (2024) · Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews · doi:10.1002/dmrr.3650 · Cited by 57
The FDA and designing clinical trials for chronic cutaneous ulcers
Maderal, A. D., Vivas, A. C., Eaglstein, W. H., & Kirsner, R. S. (2012) · Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2012.09.014 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Mueller, M. J., Diamond, J. E., Sinacore, D. R., Delitto, A., Blair, V. P., Drury, D. A., & Rose, S. J.
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 1989-06-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 384-388
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W1983550958
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.