Cited by 1,023Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and ManagementSkin Diseases and DiabetesPeripheral Artery Disease Management

High prevalence of ischaemia, infection and serious comorbidity in patients with diabetic foot disease in Europe: baseline results from the Eurodiale study.

Open access
Prompers, L., Huijberts, M., Apelqvist, J., Jude, E., Piaggesi, A., Bakker, K., Edmonds, M., Holstein, P. +11 more·2007·Diabetologia

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis Large clinical studies describing the typical clinical presentation of diabetic foot ulcers are limited and most studies were performed in single centres with the possibility of selection of specific subgroups. The aim of this study was to investigate the characteristics of diabetic patients with a foot ulcer in 14 European hospitals in ten countries.Methods The study population included 1,229 consecutive patients presenting with a new foot ulcer between 1 September 2003 and 1 October 2004. Standardised data on patient characteristics, as well as foot and ulcer characteristics, were obtained. Foot disease was categorised into four stages according to the presence or absence of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and infection: A: PAD -, infection -; B: PAD -, infection +; C: PAD +, infection -; D: PAD +, infection +.Results PAD was diagnosed in 49% of the subjects, infection in 58%. The majority of ulcers (52%) were located on the non-plantar surface of the foot. With regard to severity, 24% had stage A, 27% had stage B, 18% had stage C and 31% had stage D foot disease. Patients in the latter group had a distinct profile: they were older, had more non-plantar ulcers, greater tissue loss and more serious comorbidity.Conclusions/interpretation According to our results in this European cohort, the severity of diabetic foot ulcers at presentation is greater than previously reported, as one-third had both PAD and infection. Non-plantar foot ulcers were more common than plantar ulcers, especially in patients with severe disease, and serious comorbidity increased significantly with increasing severity of foot disease. Further research is needed to obtain insight into the clinical outcome of these patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00125-006-0491-1

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Peripheral artery disease affects approximately half of people with diabetic foot ulcers.

    “Because peripheral artery disease affects approximately half of people with diabetic foot ulcers, 5 clinicians should consider noninvasive testing with the ankle-brachial index or toebrachial index and/or referral to vascular specialists in people with diabetic foot ulcers.35”

    From Diabetic Foot Ulcers (2023) · cites this paper as [5]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Prompers, L., Huijberts, M., Apelqvist, J., Jude, E., Piaggesi, A., Bakker, K., Edmonds, M., Holstein, P., Jirkovska, A., Mauricio, D., Ragnarson Tennvall, G., Reike, H., Spraul, M., Uccioli, L., Urbancic, V., Van Acker, K., van Baal, J., van Merode, F., & Schaper, N.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
  • Malmö University (SE)
  • Tameside Hospital (GB)
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana (IT)
  • International Diabetes Federation (BE)
  • King's College Hospital (GB)
  • Bispebjerg Hospital (DK)
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
  • Klinikum Rheine (DE)
  • Policlinico Tor Vergata (IT)
Corresponding author
Prompers, L.
Venue
Diabetologia
Published
2006-11-09
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
18-25
ISSN
  • 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0428
OpenAlex
W1991974656
Cited by
1,023
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 58 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 83 · 2023: 90 · 2022: 89 · 2021: 98 · 2020: 97 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 29
FWCI
10.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cineca Institutional Research Information System (Tor Vergata University) (submittedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Commission
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Diseases and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Peripheral Artery Disease Management
Keywords
diabetic foot ulcer, peripheral arterial disease, foot infection, comorbidities, tissue loss, diabetic foot
MeSH terms
Aged, Europe, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Foot Diseases, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Cohort Studies, Comorbidity, Prevalence, Peripheral Vascular Diseases, Diabetic Foot

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review