The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Identifying Diabetic Patients at High Risk for Lower-Extremity Amputation in a Primary Health Care Setting: A prospective evaluation of simple screening criteria
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate prospectively a risk categorization scheme for lower-extremity problems that incorporates the Semmes-Weinstein 5.07 monofilament and a simple exam to stratify patients who were followed in a primary-care setting into risk groups for plantar ulceration and lower-extremity amputation. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients with diabetes in a well-defined American-Indian population were stratified into four risk categories based on sensation status to the 5.07 monofilament, the presence of foot deformity, and a history of lower-extremity events (amputation or ulceration): category 0, sensate; category 1, insensate; category 2, insensate with deformity; and category 3, history of lower extremity events. Patients were followed prospectively for lower extremity events and changes in sensation status. RESULTS: We gave screening exams to 358 (88%) of 406 individuals with diabetes in the community. The distribution of patients for risk categories 0, 1, 2, and 3 was 74.3, 8.4, 4.5, and 13%, respectively. Over a 32-mo follow-up period, 41 patients developed ulcerations, and incidence rates correlated positively with increasing risk category (P < 0.00001). All 14 amputations occurred in risk groups 2 and 3. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the risk categorization described here may have a role in identifying patients at risk for lower extremity events who are followed in a primary-care setting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ismail-Beigi, F., Craven, T., Banerji, M. A., Basile, J., Calles, J., Cohen, R. M., Cuddihy, R., Cushman, W. C., Genuth, S., Grimm, R. H., et al. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60576-4 · Cited by 1,428
Olaleye, D., Perkins, B. A., & Bril, V. (2001) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/s0168-8227(01)00278-9 · Cited by 158
Prevalence and risk factors for neuropathy in a Canadian First Nation community
Bruce, S. G., & Young, T. K. (2008) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc08-0278 · Cited by 90
Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Evaluation and Management
Maderal, A. D., Vivas, A. C., Zwick, T. G., & Kirsner, R. S. (2012) · Hospital Practice · doi:10.3810/hp.2012.08.994 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Rith-Najarian, S. J., Stolusky, T., & Gohdes, D. M.
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 1992-10-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1386-1389
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2018061190
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.