The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Multicenter Study of the Prevalence of Diabetes Mellitus and Impaired Glucose Tolerance in the Urban Brazilian Population Aged 30–69 yr
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of diabetes and IGT in the urban adult Brazilian population. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We used a two-stage, multicenter, cross-sectional survey in a random sample of 21,847 individuals aged 30–69 yr from nine large cities. Subjects were first screened by FCG. All positive screenees (FCG ≥ 5.6 mM/L) and every sixth consecutive negative screenee were administered a 75 g OGTT and classified as diabetic, IGT, or normal (nondiabetic) according to WHO recommendations. OGTT findings from the negative screenees were extrapolated to all negative screenees after adjustments for potential biases. RESULTS: The overall rates were 7.6 and 7.8% for diabetes and IGT, respectively. Men (7.5%) and women (7.6%) had similar rates of diabetes. Similar rates resulted with whites (7.8%) and nonwhites (7.3%). Diabetes prevalence increased from 2.7% in the 30–39-yr age-group to 17.4% in the 60–69-yr age-group. Diabetes was more prevalent among less educated people, but this difference disappeared after adjusting for age. Family history of diabetes was associated with a twofold increase in diabetes prevalence (12.5 vs. 5.8%); the same increase occurred with obesity (11.6 vs. 5.2%). Undiagnosed diabetes accounted for 46% of the total prevalence. Among previously diagnosed cases, 22.3% were not under treatment, 7.9% were on insulin, 40.7% were on oral agents, and 29.1% were on dietary treatment only. Self-reported diabetes prevalence was 0.1, 3.2, and 11.6% in the age groups < 30, 30–69, and > 70 yr, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of diabetes in Brazil is comparable with that of more developed countries, where it is considered a major health problem.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030
Shaw, J. E., Sicree, R. A., & Zimmet, P. Z. (2010) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2009.10.007 · Cited by 7,216
Prevalência de diabetes autorreferido no Brasil: Resultados da Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde 2013
Iser, B. P. M., Stopa, S. R., Chueiri, P. S., Szwarcwald, C. L., Malta, D. C., Monteiro, H. O. D. C., Duncan, B. B., & Schmidt, M. I. (2015) · Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde · doi:10.5123/s1679-49742015000200013 · Cited by 90
Caetano, M. S. S., Silva, R. D. C., & Kater, C. E. (2007) · Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia · doi:10.1590/s0004-27302007000700015 · Cited by 36
Gomes, M. B., Rodacki, M., Pavin, E. J., Cobas, R. A., Felicio, J. S., Zajdenverg, L., & Negrato, C. A. (2017) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2017.09.013 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Malerbi, D. A., Franco, L. J., & The Brazilian Cooperative Group on the Study of Diabetes Prevalence
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 1992-11-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1509-1516
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2080454816
- Cited by
- 587
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multicenter Study of the Prevalence of Diabetes Mellitus and Impaired Glucose Tolerance in the Urban Brazilian Population Aged 30–69 yr. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diacare.15.11.1509
- The paper
- Malerbi, D. A., Franco, L. J., & The Brazilian Cooperative Group on the Study of Diabetes Prevalence. (1992). Multicenter Study of the Prevalence of Diabetes Mellitus and Impaired Glucose Tolerance in the Urban Brazilian Population Aged 30–69 yr. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.15.11.1509
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.