Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 90

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalência de diabetes autorreferido no Brasil: resultados da Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde 2013

Iser, Betine Pinto Moehlecke, Stopa, Sheila Rizzato, Chueiri, Patrícia Sampaio, Szwarcwald, Célia Landmann, Malta, Deborah Carvalho, Monteiro, Helena Oliveira da Cruz, Duncan, Bruce Bartholow, Schmidt, Maria Inês·2015·Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde

Abstract

Objetivo: estimar a prevalência de diabetes autorreferido no Brasil e descrevê-la segundo características sociodemográficas.Métodos: estudo descritivo da prevalência de diagnóstico médico de diabetes em adultos (≥18 anos) sobre dados da Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde (PNS), inquérito domiciliar realizado no Brasil em 2013.Resultados: foram entrevistados 60.202 moradores; a prevalência da doença reportada foi de 6,2% (IC 95% 5,9-6,6), maior nas mulheres (7,0%; IC 95% 6,5-7,5) do que nos homens (5,4%; IC 95% 4,8-5,9), e entre os moradores da área urbana (6,5%; IC 95% 6,1-6,9) do que da área rural (4,6%; IC 95% 4,0-5,2); estimou-se um total de aproximadamente 9 milhões de pessoas com diabetes no país, cerca de 3,5 milhões delas com 65 anos ou mais de idade.Conclusão: os resultados da PNS foram consistentes com outras pesquisas realizadas e mostram um contingente populacional elevado de pessoas com o diagnóstico da doença no país, especialmente nas áreas urbanas.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5123/s1679-49742015000200013

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 2
CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Szwarcwald CL, Malta DC, Pereira CA, Vieira MLFP, Conde WL, Souza Júnior PRB, et al. National Health Survey in Brazil: design and methodology of application. Cienc Saude Coletiva. 2014 Feb;19(2):333-42.
  2. Freitas LRS, Garcia LP. Evolução da prevalência do diabetes e deste associado à hipertensão arterial no Brasil: análise da Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios, 1998, 2003 e 2008. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2012 mar;21(1):7-19.
  3. Moreira JPL, Moraes JR, Luiz RR. Use of medical consultations and the occurrence of systemic arterial hypertension in urban and rural areas of Brazil, according to PNAD data 2008. Cienc Saude Colet. 2011 Sep;16(9):3781-93.

Cited by

See all 90

Metadata

Authors
Iser, B. P. M., Stopa, S. R., Chueiri, P. S., Szwarcwald, C. L., Malta, D. C., Monteiro, H. O. D. C., Duncan, B. B., & Schmidt, M. I.
Venue
Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
Published
2015-06
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
305-314
ISSN
1679-4974
Cited by
90
References
20
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalência de diabetes autorreferido no Brasil: resultados da Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde 2013. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5123/s1679-49742015000200013
The paper
Iser, B. P. M., Stopa, S. R., Chueiri, P. S., Szwarcwald, C. L., Malta, D. C., Monteiro, H. O. D. C., Duncan, B. B., & Schmidt, M. I. (2015). Prevalência de diabetes autorreferido no Brasil: resultados da Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde 2013. Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde. https://doi.org/10.5123/s1679-49742015000200013

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.