Glycemic Control and Complications in Type II Diabetes: Design of a feasibility trial
Abstract
Objective To determine, after 1 yr of follow-up in type II diabetes patients, whether a statistically and clinically significant difference can be achieved in HbA1c between a standard therapy group and an intensively treated group, while maintaining HbA1c levels in both groups within ranges acceptable in regular community practice. Secondary objectives include assessment of patient adherence to protocol, side effects, and accuracy of data collection. Research design and methods This is a prospective, randomized, controlled VA CS conducted with 151 patients at five VAMCs. Patients are males, age 40-69 yr, treated at entry with a maximum dose of sulfonylurea or with insulin, exhibiting an HbA1c level > 3 SDs above the normal mean (5.05 + 3 x 0.50 = > 6.55%). Standard control is achieved with insulin and intensive control with a step-up regimen including insulin alone or insulin/glipizide combinations. Education and management of cardiovascular risk factors are handled similarly in both groups. Primary macrovascular end points are nonfatal myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, stroke, amputation, and cardiovascular death. Primary microvascular end points are appearance and progression of retinopathy, documented by centrally read seven-field-stereo fundus photographs. Other measured indicators include resting and ambulatory ECGs, ventricular function (MUGA scan), serum lipid and apolipoprotein levels, plasma fibrinogen, nonsymptomatic peripheral vasculopathy, neuroauto…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An HbA1c target of ≤6.5% probably decreased the incidence of moderately increased albuminuria and kidney failure.
“Six studies compared a target HbA1c of # 6.5% to higher HbA1c targets (standard glycemic control) and found that an HbA1c target of # 6.5% probably decreased the incidence of moderately increased albuminuria, and kidney failure (Supplementary Table S12 239,240,242 -244,252 )”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [239]
In clinical trials, targeting lower HbA1c levels has reduced the rates of chronic diabetes complications in patients with T1D or T2D.
“Moreover, in clinical trials, targeting lower HbA1c levels has reduced the rates of chronic diabetes complications in patients with T1D 190,232 -238 or T2D. 239 -246”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [239]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
KDIGO 2020 Clinical practice guideline for diabetes management in chronic kidney disease
de Boer, I. H., Caramori, M. L., Chan, J. C. N., Heerspink, H. J. L., Hurst, C., Khunti, K., Liew, A., Michos, E. D., Navaneethan, S. D., Olowu, W. A., et al. (2020) · Kidney International · doi:10.1016/j.kint.2020.06.019 · Cited by 1,399 · see citing works
KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease
Rossing, P., Caramori, M. L., Chan, J. C. N., Heerspink, H. J. L., Hurst, C., Khunti, K., Liew, A., Michos, E. D., Navaneethan, S. D., Olowu, W. A., et al. (2022) · Kidney International · doi:10.1016/j.kint.2022.06.008 · Cited by 1,373 · see citing works
Hemmingsen, B., Lund, S. S., Gluud, C., Vaag, A., Almdal, T., Hemmingsen, C., & Wetterslev, J. (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d6898 · Cited by 386 · see citing works
Symptoms and Well-Being in Relation to Glycemic Control in Type II Diabetes
Van der Does, F. E. E., De Neeling, J. N. D., Snoek, F. J., Kostense, P. J., Grootenhuis, P. A., Bouter, L. M., & Heine, R. J. (1996) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.19.3.204 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Renal damage in patients with type 2 diabetes: a strong predictor of mortality
Bo, S., Ciccone, G., Rosato, R., Gancia, R., Grassi, G., Merletti, F., & Pagano, G. F. (2005) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01394.x · Cited by 42 · see citing works
- Authors
- Abraira, C., Emanuele, N., Colwell, J., Henderson, W., Comstock, J., Levin, S., Nuttall, F., Sawin, C., & VA CS Group (CSDM)
- Affiliations
- United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
- ORCID
- Henderson, William
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 1992-11-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1560-1571
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W1973867380
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 1.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- type 2 diabetes, glycemic control, intensive insulin therapy, HbA1c, macrovascular complications, microvascular complications, diabetic retinopathy, cardiovascular risk factors, sulfonylureas, glipizide, microalbuminuria, peripheral vascular disease, fibrinogen, serum lipids, veterans
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetic Angiopathies, Electrocardiography, Feasibility Studies, Follow-Up Studies, Glipizide, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Insulin, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Risk Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review