Cited by 262Diabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and Management

Symptoms and Well-Being in Relation to Glycemic Control in Type II Diabetes

Open access
Van der Does, Ferdinand E E, De Neeling, J Nico D, Snoek, Frank J, Kostense, Pieter J, Grootenhuis, Peter A, Bouter, Lex M, Heine, Robert J·1996·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the cross-sectional relation between glycemic control and physical symptoms, emotional well-being, and general well-being in patients with type II diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The study population consisted of 188 patients with type II diabetes between 40 and 75 years of age. Patients were treated with blood glucose-lowering agents or had either a fasting venous plasma glucose level ≥7.8 mmol/l or an HbA1c level > 6.1%. Multiple regression analyses were performed. Dependent variables were scores on the Type II Diabetes Symptom Checklist, the Profile of Mood States, the Affect Balance Scale, and questions regarding general well-being. The primary determinant under study was HbA1c. In addition, age, sex, neuroticism (indicating a general tendency to complain), insulin use, and comorbidity were included as determinants in all analyses. Other potential determinants taken into consideration were hypoglycemic complaints, marital status, diabetes duration, cardiovascular history, blood pressure, BMI, waist-to-hip ratio, perceived burden of treatment, and smoking. None of these potential determinants had to be included to correct confounding of the relation between HbA1c and well-being scores. RESULTS: Higher HbA1c levels were significantly associated with higher symptom scores (total score, hyperglycemic score, and neuropathic score), with worse mood (total score, displeasure score, depression, tension, fatigue), and with worse general well-being. The relative risks varied between 1.02 and 1.36 for each percentage difference in HbA1c. The relation between HbA1c and some mood states was modified by neuroticism: in the less neurotic patient (i.e., one who is less inclined to complain), the relation was more evident. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that better glycemic control in type II diabetes is associated with fewer physical symptoms, better mood, and better well-being, in a nonhypoglycemic HbA1c range.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diacare.19.3.204

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [6]6. Miles P, Haigh R, Viller T, Kerr D: Insulin treatment in the very old: good idea or bad mistake (Poster)? In Proc of the 54 Annual Meeting of the American Diabetes Association, New Orleans, 1994. Alexandria, VA, American Diabetes Association.
  2. [7]7. Keen H: Diabetes diagnosis. In International Textbook of Diabetes Mellitus. Alberti KGMM, DeFronzo RA, Keen H, Zimmet P, Eds. New York, Wiley, 1992
  3. [8]8. Arky RA: Clinical correlates of metabolic derangements of diabetes mellitus. In Clinical Diabetes Mellitus. Kozak I, George P, Eds. Philadelphia, Saunders, 1982

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van der Does, F. E. E., De Neeling, J. N. D., Snoek, F. J., Kostense, P. J., Grootenhuis, P. A., Bouter, L. M., & Heine, R. J.
Affiliations
  • Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine (EMGO Institute), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
1996-03-01
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
204-210
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2164470316
Cited by
262
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Novo Nordisk
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, glycemic control, HbA1c, diabetes symptoms, mood, well-being, neuroticism, depression, fatigue, hyperglycemia, diabetic neuropathy, insulin use, comorbidities
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Aged, Attitude to Health, Blood Glucose, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Fatigue, Female, Health Status, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Male, Middle Aged, Neurotic Disorders, Regression Analysis, Sex Factors, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review