The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Prevalence and Identification of Risk Factors for NIDDM in Urban Africans in Cape Town, South Africa
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of NIDDM and associated risk factors in urban Africans in Cape Town, South Africa. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: With a three-stage, proportional, stratified, random cluster method, we sampled 1000 Africans, > 30 yr of age, living in African residential areas in Cape Town. We assessed glucose tolerance with a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test, according to World Health Organization criteria, and obtained anthropometric and demographic data. RESULTS: The response rate was 79%. The prevalence of NIDDM was 8.0% (confidence interval 5.8–10.3%), age-adjusted to world population figures and that of impaired glucose tolerance, 7.0% (confidence interval 4.9–9.1%). Multivariate analysis indicated that increased age (odds ratio 4.18), upper-segment fat distribution (odds ratio 2.94), proportion of life spent in an urban area (odds ratio 2.32), and obesity (odds ratio 2.31) were significant independent risk factors for NIDDM. In contrast, sex, family history, alcohol intake, and physical activity were not independent risk factors. Only increased age (odds ratio 4.06) was a significant risk factor for impaired glucose tolerance. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of NIDDM in urban Africans in Cape Town, South Africa, is moderately high, and considerably higher than previous reports from Africa. The association of NIDDM with urbanization has important implications in view of the large-scale urbanization occurring in southern Africa.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Harris, M. I., Hadden, W. C., Knowler, W. C., & Bennett, P. H. (1987) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/diab.36.4.523 · Cited by 1,096
DIABETES INCIDENCE IN PIMA INDIANS: CONTRIBUTIONS OF OBESITY AND PARENTAL DIABETES1
KNOWLER, W. C., PETTITT, D. J., SAVAGE, P. J., & BENNETT, P. H. (1981) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113079 · Cited by 561
Cited by
Wild, S., Roglic, G., Green, A., Sicree, R., & King, H. (2004) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.27.5.1047 · Cited by 15,297
Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030
Shaw, J. E., Sicree, R. A., & Zimmet, P. Z. (2010) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2009.10.007 · Cited by 7,216
Diabetes Buddies: Peer Support Through a Mobile Phone Buddy System
Rotheram-Borus, M. J., Tomlinson, M., Gwegwe, M., Comulada, W. S., Kaufman, N., & Keim, M. (2012) · The Diabetes Educator · doi:10.1177/0145721712444617 · Cited by 108
“8% to 8%.(2,3) In 2005, diabetes was the sixth leading cause of death in South Africa, whereas HIV was the tenth.”
BackgroundNthangeni, G., Steyn, N. P., Alberts, M., Steyn, K., Levitt, N. S., Laubscher, R., Bourne, L., Dick, J., & Temple, N. (2002) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1079/phn2002256 · Cited by 77
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Levitt, N. S., Katzenellenbogen, J. M., Bradshaw, D., Hoffman, M. N., & Bonnici, F.
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 1993-04-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 601-607
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W1976556131
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Prevalence and Identification of Risk Factors for NIDDM in Urban Africans in Cape Town, South Africa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diacare.16.4.601
- The paper
- Levitt, N. S., Katzenellenbogen, J. M., Bradshaw, D., Hoffman, M. N., & Bonnici, F. (1993). The Prevalence and Identification of Risk Factors for NIDDM in Urban Africans in Cape Town, South Africa. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.16.4.601
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.