Cited by 108Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and Research

Diabetes Buddies: Peer Support Through a Mobile Phone Buddy System

Open access
Rotheram-Borus, Mary Jane, Tomlinson, Mark, Gwegwe, Margaret, Comulada, W. Scott, Kaufman, Neal, Keim, Marion·2012·The Diabetes Educator

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to test the feasibility and acceptability of a mobile phone–based peer support intervention among women in resource-poor settings to self-manage their diabetes. Secondary goals were to evaluate the intervention’s effectiveness to motivate diabetes-related health choices. Methods Women with diabetes (n = 22) in Cape Town, South Africa, participated in a 12-week program focused on providing and applying knowledge of health routines to manage diabetes. Women were linked with a buddy via a mobile phone for support and were questioned daily about a health behavior via text message. Women were assessed at recruitment and then 3 and 6 months later by a trained interviewer using a mobile phone for data collection. The women were evaluated on technology uptake, reduction of body mass index, blood glucose levels, and increases in positive coping and general health-seeking behaviors. Results Women exchanged 16 739 text messages to buddies and received 3144 texts from the project. Women responded to 29% of texted questions (n = 1321/14 582). Women attended at least 9 of 12 possible intervention sessions; a third attended all 12 sessions (n = 8/22). Between baseline and 3 months, women increased their sleep and reported a higher level of positive action and social support coping, yet blood glucose increased by 3.3 points. From 3 to 6 months, spiritual hope decreased and diastolic blood pressure increased. One year later, the 22 women continue to attend meetings. Conclusions Mobile phones are an easy and reliable way to provide peer support and disseminate health messages. Both positive and negative changes were observed in this pilot study.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0145721712444617

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In 8 included studies, mHealth interventions connected a patient to a provider, directly facilitating patient access to professional care.

    “In 8 studies, mHealth interventions connected a patient to a provider, thus directly facilitating patient access to (professional) care [20, 37, 46, 50, 51, 53–55].”
  • Participating patients or providers usually required only a few days of training on how to use the mobile technology and the consultation procedures.

    “Participating patients or providers usually required only a few days of training on how to use the mobile technology (such as the mobile phone and its application software) and the consultation procedures [41, 43, 46–48, 50, 55].”
  • For patients, the most important predisposing characteristic associated with the perception that an mHealth intervention was more useful than an alternative was patients' cultural and social acceptance of the mobile technology, involving familiarity with the technology in the community and absence of negative myths.

    “For patients, the most important predisposing characteristic associated with the perception that a mHealth intervention was more useful than an alternative was the patients’ cultural and social acceptance of the mobile technology, which involved familiarity with the technology in the community and absence of negative myths [38, 40, 41, 46, 53, 55].”
  • mHealth interventions have to be specifically designed to be easy to use for particular groups of patients, such as older age groups, or people with low educational levels or poor socio-economic backgrounds.

    “In addition, studies reported that mHealth interventions have to be specifically designed to be easy to use for particular groups of patients, such as older age groups [55], or people with low educational levels [50, 55] or poor socio-economic backgrounds [50].”
  • If patients faced access barriers such as long travel times, waiting times, and high travel costs, mHealth interventions were perceived to be useful.

    “If patients faced access barriers such as long travel times, waiting times, and high travel costs, mHealth interventions were perceived to be useful [20, 42, 45, 46, 48–50, 52, 53, 55].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rotheram-Borus, M. J., Tomlinson, M., Gwegwe, M., Comulada, W. S., Kaufman, N., & Keim, M.
Affiliations
  • Center for Community Health, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (Dr Rotheram-Borus, Dr Comulada)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
The Diabetes Educator
Published
2012-04-30
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
357-365
ISSN
  • 0145-7217 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-6063
OpenAlex
W2146644753
Cited by
108
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 1
FWCI
19.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (P30MH058107)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
diabetes self-management, peer support, mobile phone intervention, text messaging, women with diabetes, resource-limited settings, feasibility and acceptability, glycemic control, body mass index, sleep, coping, health-seeking behavior, diastolic blood pressure, Cape Town
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Feasibility Studies, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Motivation, Pilot Projects, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Care, Social Support, South Africa, Health Behavior, Young Adult, Text Messaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review