The DOI matches its Crossref record.
High Prevalence of Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Diabetic Patients
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in diabetic patients and to investigate the influence of several epidemiological and clinical factors on HCV infection. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 176 consecutive diabetic patients were compared with 6,172 blood donors, matched by recognized risk factors to acquire HCV infection. Serologic testing for anti-HCV was done using a second-generation commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and an immunoblot assay was performed in anti-HCV positive samples to confirm HCV specificity. Diabetic patients were divided in two groups according to their HCV antibody status and analyzed for the following variables: age, sex, type of diabetes, duration of disease, mode of therapy, late diabetic complications, previous blood transfusions, intravenous drug addiction, hospital admissions, major surgical procedures, and liver function tests (LFTs). RESULTS: A higher prevalence of HCV infection was observed in diabetic patients in comparison with blood donors (11.5 vs. 2.5%; P < 0.001; odds ratio 4.39; 95% CI 2.61–7.24). We did not detect any particular epidemiological factor for HCV infection in anti-HCV positive diabetic patients. In these patients, abnormal LFTs were observed in 72.3%, compared with only 24.7% of anti-HCV negative diabetic patients (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A high prevalence of HCV infection was detected in diabetic patients, and most of anti-HCV positive patients presented with abnormal LFTs. Therefore, testing for HCV infection of diabetic patients with an abnormal LFT is mandatory. The lack of any particular epidemiological factor for HCV infection in our diabetic population suggests that HCV may have a direct role in the development of diabetes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mehta, S. H., Brancati, F. L., Sulkowski, M. S., Strathdee, S. A., Szklo, M., & Thomas, D. L. (2000) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-133-8-200010170-00009 · Cited by 676
Hepatitis C infection and risk of diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
White, D. L., Ratziu, V., & El-Serag, H. B. (2008) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2008.08.006 · Cited by 451
New insulin delivery recommendations
Frid, A. H., Kreugel, G., Grassi, G., Halimi, S., Hicks, D., Hirsch, L. J., Smith, M. J., Wellhoener, R., Bode, B. W., Hirsch, I. B., et al. (2016) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.06.010 · Cited by 286
Zignego, A. L., Ferri, C., Pileri, S. A., Caini, P., & Bianchi, F. B. (2007) · Digestive and Liver Disease · doi:10.1016/j.dld.2006.06.008 · Cited by 262
Wang, C.-S., Wang, S.-T., Yao, W.-J., Chang, T.-T., & Chou, P. (2007) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwm061 · Cited by 166
Metadata
- Authors
- Simó, R., Hernández, C., Genescà, J., Jardí, R., & Mesa, J.
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 1996-09-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 998-1000
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2006613082
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High Prevalence of Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Diabetic Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diacare.19.9.998
- The paper
- Simó, R., Hernández, C., Genescà, J., Jardí, R., & Mesa, J. (1996). High Prevalence of Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Diabetic Patients. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.19.9.998
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.