The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quality of Life and Associated Characteristics in a Large National Sample of Adults With Diabetes
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the quality of life and the demographic, medical-history, and self-management characteristics associated with it. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A diabetes self-management survey was sent to 2,800 adults with diabetes throughout the U.S. who were part of a marketing company national sample. The response rate was 73%. The final sample of 2,056 persons was heterogeneous: the average age was 59 years (range, 18–92 years); 53% had high school education or less; 86% had type II diabetes; 62% were female; and 31% reported being on an intensive management plan, such as the one used in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Quality-of-life items included the social, physical, and mental health dimensions of the Short Form (SF-20) of the General Health Survey. RESULTS: Overall, respondents reported a moderate to low quality of life, relative to previous studies. Factors related to lower quality of life included: less education, lower income, older age, being female, type of health insurance (no medical insurance or Medicare/Medicaid recipients reported lower quality of life than those with either a health maintenance organization or private insurance), number of diabetes complications, number of comorbid illnesses, and lower levels of physical activity. Multiple regression analyses revealed that the level of self-reported exercise was the only significant self-management behavior to predict the quality of life, after controlling for demographic and medical variables. CONCLUSIONS: If the findings regarding physical activity are replicated, it may be that moderate-intensity physical activity programs could be initiated with diabetic individuals at risk of low quality of life. Quality of life is an important and understudied topic in diabetes that appears to be related to demographic, medical-history, and self-management factors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Causes and consequences of comorbidity
Gijsen, R., Hoeymans, N., Schellevis, F. G., Ruwaard, D., Satariano, W. A., & van den Bos, G. A. M. (2001) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00363-2 · Cited by 962
Multimorbidity and quality of life in primary care: a systematic review
Fortin, M., Lapointe, L., Hudon, C., Vanasse, A., Ntetu, A. L., & Maltais, D. (2004) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/1477-7525-2-51 · Cited by 963
The Impact of Comorbid Chronic Conditions on Diabetes Care
Piette, J. D., & Kerr, E. A. (2006) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.29.03.06.dc05-2078 · Cited by 731
Jing, X., Chen, J., Dong, Y., Han, D., Zhao, H., Wang, X., Gao, F., Li, C., Cui, Z., Liu, Y., et al. (2018) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/s12955-018-1021-9 · Cited by 336
Cartwright, M., Hirani, S. P., Rixon, L., Beynon, M., Doll, H., Bower, P., Bardsley, M., Steventon, A., Knapp, M., Henderson, C., et al. (2013) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.f653 · Cited by 240
Metadata
- Authors
- Glasgow, R. E., Ruggiero, L., Eakin, E. G., Dryfoos, J., & Chobanian, L.
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 1997-04-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 562-567
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2003593905
- Cited by
- 471
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quality of Life and Associated Characteristics in a Large National Sample of Adults With Diabetes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diacare.20.4.562
- The paper
- Glasgow, R. E., Ruggiero, L., Eakin, E. G., Dryfoos, J., & Chobanian, L. (1997). Quality of Life and Associated Characteristics in a Large National Sample of Adults With Diabetes. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.20.4.562
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.