The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Insulin and Cognitive Function in an Elderly Population: The Rotterdam Study
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between insulin and cognitive function in the population-based Rotterdam Study. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Serum insulin was measured 2 h after an oral glucose load, while global cognitive function was assessed by the Mini Mental State Examination in 5,510 subjects, aged 55 years and over. RESULTS: An increase in postload insulin only in women was associated with a decrease in cognitive function (age-adjusted regression coefficient −0.10 per 50 mU/l insulin; 95% CI −0.16 to −0.04). The association between insulin resistance, assessed by the ratio of postload insulin over glucose, and cognitive function was not statistically significant. Further adjustment for the individual risk factors of serum glucose, BMI, HDL, systolic blood pressure, smoking, or use of estrogen did not change the results. The association was present in women with and without cardiovascular disease and present after excluding subjects with diabetes. Women with dementia, the extreme of cognitive dysfunction, had increased age-adjusted insulin levels (76.3 ± 4.9 vs. 66.8 ± 1.0 mU/l [means ± SE], P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that increased serum insulin may be associated with decreased cognitive function and dementia in women. These findings are more compatible with a direct effect of insulin on the brain than with an effect through an increase in cardiovascular risk factors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Insulin-degrading Enzyme Regulates Extracellular Levels of Amyloid β-Protein by Degradation
Qiu, W. Q., Walsh, D. M., Ye, Z., Vekrellis, K., Zhang, J., Podlisny, M. B., Rosner, M. R., Safavi, A., Hersh, L. B., & Selkoe, D. J. (1998) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.273.49.32730 · Cited by 812
Cognition and synaptic plasticity in diabetes mellitus
Gispen, W. H., & Biessels, G.-J. (2000) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(00)01656-8 · Cited by 772
Hyperinsulinemia and risk of Alzheimer disease
Luchsinger, J. A., Tang, M.-X., Shea, S., & Mayeux, R. (2004) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000140292.04932.87 · Cited by 683
Ho, L., Qin, W., Pompl, P. N., Xiang, Z., Wang, J., Zhao, Z., Peng, Y., Cambareri, G., Rocher, A., Mobbs, C. V., et al. (2004) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.03-0978fje · Cited by 630
Type 2 diabetes mellitus, cognitive impairment and dementia
Stewart, R., & Liolitsa, D. (1999) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1464-5491.1999.00027.x · Cited by 562
Metadata
- Authors
- Stolk, R. P., Breteler, M. M. B., Ott, A., Pols, H. A. P., Lamberts, S. W. J., Grobbee, D. E., & Hofman, A.
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 1997-05-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 792-795
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2166766346
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Insulin and Cognitive Function in an Elderly Population: The Rotterdam Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diacare.20.5.792
- The paper
- Stolk, R. P., Breteler, M. M. B., Ott, A., Pols, H. A. P., Lamberts, S. W. J., Grobbee, D. E., & Hofman, A. (1997). Insulin and Cognitive Function in an Elderly Population: The Rotterdam Study. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.20.5.792
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.