The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Efficacy and Safely of a Topical Gel Formulation of Recombinant Human Platelet-Derived Growth Factor-BB (Becaplermin) in Patients With Chronic Neuropathic Diabetic Ulcers: A phase III randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of topically applied recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB (rhPDGF-BB) (becaplermin) with placebo gel in patients with chronic diabetic neuropathic ulcers of the lower extremities. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This multicenter double-blind placebo-controlled phase 111 trial included 382 patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes and chronic ulcers of at least 8 weeks' duration. After sharp debridement of the ulcer, patients were randomized to receive becaplermin gel 30 μg/g, becaplermin gel 100 μg/g, or placebo gel, in conjunction with a standardized regimen of good wound care until complete wound closure was achieved or for a maximum of 20 weeks. Moist saline-soaked gauze dressings were changed twice daily with study medication applied by patients or caregivers at the evening dressing change. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs) and by clinical laboratory evaluations. RESULTS: Compared with placebo gel, becaplermin gel 100 μg/g significantly increased the incidence of complete wound closure by 43% (50 vs. 35%, P = 0.007) and decreased the time to achieve complete wound closure by 32% (86 vs. 127 days; estimated 35th percentile, P = 0.013). AEs reported during treatment or during a 3-month follow-up period were similar in nature and incidence across all treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Becaplermin gel 100 μg/g, in conjunction with good wound care, significantly increased the incidence of complete wound closure and significantly reduced the time to complete closure of chronic diabetic neuropathic ulcers. The safety profile of becaplermin gel was similar to that of placebo gel.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lipsky, B. A., Berendt, A. R., Cornia, P. B., Pile, J. C., Peters, E. J. G., Armstrong, D. G., Deery, H. G., Embil, J. M., Joseph, W. S., Karchmer, A. W., et al. (2012) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cis346 · Cited by 1,766
Jeffcoate, W. J., & Harding, K. G. (2003) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13169-8 · Cited by 1,050
Therapeutic strategies for enhancing angiogenesis in wound healing
Veith, A. P., Henderson, K., Spencer, A., Sligar, A. D., & Baker, A. B. (2019) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2018.09.010 · Cited by 1,021
Hingorani, A., LaMuraglia, G. M., Henke, P., Meissner, M. H., Loretz, L., Zinszer, K. M., Driver, V. R., Frykberg, R., Carman, T. L., Marston, W., et al. (2016) · Journal of Vascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2015.10.003 · Cited by 641
Modulating the stem cell niche for tissue regeneration
Lane, S. W., Williams, D. A., & Watt, F. M. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2978 · Cited by 615
Metadata
- Authors
- Wieman, T. J., Smiell, J. M., & Su, Y.
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 1998-05-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 822-827
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W1988691104
- Cited by
- 682
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficacy and Safely of a Topical Gel Formulation of Recombinant Human Platelet-Derived Growth Factor-BB (Becaplermin) in Patients With Chronic Neuropathic Diabetic Ulcers: A phase III randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diacare.21.5.822
- The paper
- Wieman, T. J., Smiell, J. M., & Su, Y. (1998). Efficacy and Safely of a Topical Gel Formulation of Recombinant Human Platelet-Derived Growth Factor-BB (Becaplermin) in Patients With Chronic Neuropathic Diabetic Ulcers: A phase III randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.21.5.822
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.